Anabolics for performance or size

  1. Registered User
    JohnRock's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Age
    33
    Posts
    463
    Answers
    0

    Anabolics for performance or size


    I've been doing a lot of reading here at the boards and it seems there's somewhat of a consensus that people under a certain size (200 lbs or so) shouldn't even consider steroids. Is this idea only in relation to people who are trying to be as big as possible? What about guys like me who want to look good, but that's not our only goal. I'm 30 years old, in great condition with a pretty solid background of lifting and exercise, but size isn't THE most important thing to me. I hover just slightly under 200 lbs., but I can also run a mile in about five minutes, do mixed martial arts, etc. I believe I'm at or very near my performance peak and I have no aspirations of being huge. Slightly more muscular, sure, but not body builder big. What are your thoughts on people doing a cycle with athletic performance being as important or more important than size taking a steroid/PH?

  2. Registered User
    nosnmiveins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Age
    27
    Posts
    6,833
    Answers
    0


    everyone has different goals, and by NO means is AAS only for bodybuilding and size.

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Size-on Max performance + Canada
    By dlau in forum Nutraplanet
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-27-2010, 02:35 PM
  2. ADD and Anabolics
    By krazy in forum Male Anti-Aging Medicine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-23-2009, 07:06 PM
  3. ADD and Anabolics
    By krazy in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-25-2008, 06:01 PM
  4. Do you try to add size or maintain size?
    By Jim Mills in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-07-2008, 12:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in