What's Better For Bulking Cycle?
- 02-23-2004, 10:40 PM
- 02-23-2004, 11:42 PM
How old are you? Whats your training history? Your cycle history? What are your overall goals? There is plenty of info around on all of the hormones listed SEARCH and find it.
- 02-24-2004, 10:56 AM
I'm 26 been training for six years. Have done 2 cycles of metyl 1-test and 4-ad. Also many cycles of 1-ad and VPX garbage. My overall goal is to gain more mass I am 270lbs right now. I have searched for hours about the differences between the two but didn't find anything. Know that we know a little more about me could anybody tell me the differences between the two and which one would be better for gaining mass
02-24-2004, 11:36 AM
If you are 270, I would consider a cutting cycle
02-24-2004, 11:38 AM
02-24-2004, 11:40 AM
02-24-2004, 12:09 PM
NO, I'm 6'3 and sitting at around 14% bodyfat. Once I hit 300 I will consider a cutting cycle. Anyone have a reason why the diol would be better than the dione or vise versa. Or even a reference to another infomative thread about the subject would be great. thanks.
02-24-2004, 12:53 PM
The general consensus it that the dione version is more effective. However I have used the diol version with success. I don't see the need in adding 1,4 to M1T & 4-AD unless you are looking for the increase in appetite.
02-24-2004, 01:25 PM
02-24-2004, 03:59 PM
Thanks guys I appreciate the help. The increase in appetite would be more than welcomed with the M1T. that stuff kills my appetite.
Similar Forum Threads
- By Brolic in forum AnabolicsReplies: 6Last Post: 07-10-2008, 08:03 PM
- By Indiana Jones in forum SupplementsReplies: 6Last Post: 12-17-2007, 10:43 AM
- By pecs=sexs in forum AnabolicsReplies: 2Last Post: 01-30-2006, 05:32 PM
- By hardlyworkin in forum AnabolicsReplies: 2Last Post: 10-28-2004, 11:58 PM
- By jminis in forum AnabolicsReplies: 6Last Post: 03-25-2003, 09:45 AM