I just read an article over at T Mag there saying the M1T isnt that good!!there brand of Mag 10 is better,but i see all the raves on this site,so does anyone really know if mag 10 is better??its under the colum called cyborg.
I was the biggest Biotest fan going until I waisted my money on 6 bottles of Myostat. Besides waisting money, it was probably the best thing I ever did because it opened me up to a whole new world of non-propoganda advice like AM. Some of their training articles are good but everything else is mostly bull****.
A four week supply of m-1-t is 80.00 or less. A four week supply of mag-10 is 280. What are they going to say m-1-t is better? I tried to post this on their message board and guess what happened? My post didn't make it and my name and password didn't work after my post was submitted. Cy al so stated something to the effect that m-1-t was less effective than mag- 10 and gave a reference. Someone on t-mags message board pointed out that the study actually showed that m-1-t was four times more anabolic than testosterone and that people were getting good results from m-1-t. Cy back peddled and said m-1-t was four times more anabolic than test when injected, m-1-t probably wasn't legal, and that it could cause liver problems but as long as people know that he didn't have a problem with people taking it. I personally have tried mag-10 and IMO it was a total waste on money. It is 70.00 a week and gave me absolutely no results.