i agree with the aforementioned statement. as i see it, m-1-t is the most potent pro-steroid on the market right now, but at the same time, i have seen much less side effects from every account i have read about it. gyno shouldnt even be an issue, because it doesnt arromatize. the main problems i see here could be taken care of thru simple pre-cautionary methods: take some nolva or clomid while on if u r for some reason extremely afraid of gyno (or if using an arromatizable compound with the m-1-t), throw in a little 4-ad if lethargy gets to u (be sure u have researched it as well), take some precautions with liver protection (which he already stated he was), don't go overboard on dosing (5 mg a day doesnt seem like such a crazy idea), and follow it up with good PCT. i would say he is more at risk for harmful sides if he goes with a trans 1-test/4-ad cycle like u guys recomended. with that u get the same androgenic sides u get with m-1-t (except possibly worse due to lengthened cycles), u get the estrogenic sides from the 4-ad, he still wouldnt know what having gyno or any of the other sides feel like, so he would be at just as much risk of them from this as he would from the m-1-t....
however, i am not gonna side one way or the other, because i believe experience is what he is lacking (as u guys said), and can only be gained one way. i just personally think if he were to do proper research, and know what he is doing, a 2 week cycle with such a low dose (even of such a potent substance) would put him at less risk than a 4 week of different compounds with even higher dosing.
either way u decide to go, just make sure u know absolutely sure what it is u r doing to ur body. dont let them scare u into ignoring side effects, or not reporting them. if u have any questionable things happen, look it up, or ask around on here. reporting side effects helps out everyone, so start a journal and keep it updated.
just my view on things, no offense intended toward anyone