Which is more androgenic rating wise? - AnabolicMinds.com

Which is more androgenic rating wise?

  1. New Member
    earnhardt88's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  160 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    50
    Posts
    11
    Rep Power
    82

    Reputation

    Which is more androgenic rating wise?


    Xtreme Tren or Furazadrol?

    Have had difficulty finding info on the androgenic/anabolic ratings for Furazadrol, anyone know?

  2. New Member
    earnhardt88's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  160 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    50
    Posts
    11
    Rep Power
    82

    Reputation

    found it


    I think i found it on another site, or similar to it.

    apparently goes like this:



    Miotolan(Furazabol)------
    73-94----androgenic
    anabolic --270-330
  3. Senior Member
    russianstar's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  209 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Age
    27
    Posts
    2,322
    Rep Power
    1264

    Reputation

    Xtreme tren without a doubt, the other is very mild.
    •   
       

  4. New Member
    SOLARUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    360
    Rep Power
    261

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by earnhardt88 View Post
    I think i found it on another site, or similar to it.

    apparently goes like this:

    Miotolan(Furazabol)------
    73-94----androgenic
    anabolic --270-330
    that isnt furazadrol, but it's probably close enough.
  5. New Member
    earnhardt88's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  160 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    50
    Posts
    11
    Rep Power
    82

    Reputation

    thanks


    I know Miotolan is furazabol and not furazadrol, but all that i have read, realates furazabol to furazadrol. At first, i thought furazadrol was similar to winstrol, but it apparently was not correct, more to furazabol/miotolan, and what was furaguno.

    Never have no matter where I look at any other boards etc found an andro/anabolic rating on xtreme tren
  6. Senior Member
    Ziquor's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  211 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,583
    Rep Power
    1374

    Reputation

    Xtreme Tren (pre-dienolone) has an androgenic # of 10 and Furazadrol should be about the same as Furazabol only just slightly lower - as the only difference is non-methylation and an added tetrahydropyranol ether.

    However despite X-Tren (dienolone) low androgenic #, it would have much stronger androgenic properties because it has a very strong relative binding affinity (RBA) for the androgen receptor.

    I'd put them pretty close in the real world.
  7. New Member
    SOLARUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    360
    Rep Power
    261

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Ziquor View Post
    Xtreme Tren (pre-dienolone) has an androgenic # of 10 and Furazadrol should be about the same as Furazabol only just slightly lower - as the only difference is non-methylation and an added tetrahydropyranol ether.

    However despite X-Tren (dienolone) low androgenic #, it would have much stronger androgenic properties because it has a very strong relative binding affinity (RBA) for the androgen receptor.

    I'd put them pretty close in the real world.
    um...is there any science in any of that?

    androgenic # of 10??? what?

    please tell me why non-methylation and (especially) an ether addition would lower androgenicity.

    if a steroid has a high RBA to the AR, that will be reflected in the androgenic potency. your attempt to somehow divorce them makes no sense.
  8. Senior Member
    Ziquor's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  211 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,583
    Rep Power
    1374

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by SOLARUS View Post
    um...is there any science in any of that?

    androgenic # of 10??? what?

    please tell me why non-methylation and (especially) an ether addition would lower androgenicity.

    if a steroid has a high RBA to the AR, that will be reflected in the androgenic potency. your attempt to somehow divorce them makes no sense.
    What's the question here? Vida gives it an anabolic to androgenic ratio of 100:10
  9. Senior Member
    Ziquor's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  211 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,583
    Rep Power
    1374

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by SOLARUS View Post
    um...is there any science in any of that?

    androgenic # of 10??? what?

    please tell me why non-methylation and (especially) an ether addition would lower androgenicity.

    if a steroid has a high RBA to the AR, that will be reflected in the androgenic potency. your attempt to somehow divorce them makes no sense.
    As I stated above, non-methyl (furazadrol) should be about the same as the methyl version (furazabol) but possibly lower or higher just slightly (give or take). Methylation completely changes a chemical. For example Boldenone has a anabolic to androgenic ratio of 100:50. The same exact thing, only methylated is Dianabol which has an A:A of about 210:60 and both are act very differently.

    Another example is Masteron (62:25) and Superdrol (400:20). Same chemical only one methyl one not and they have completely different properties and ratios.
  10. Senior Member
    Ziquor's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  211 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,583
    Rep Power
    1374

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by SOLARUS View Post
    um...is there any science in any of that?

    androgenic # of 10??? what?

    please tell me why non-methylation and (especially) an ether addition would lower androgenicity.

    if a steroid has a high RBA to the AR, that will be reflected in the androgenic potency. your attempt to somehow divorce them makes no sense.
    Anabolic to androgenic #'s are based on potency per dose comparison. For injectables the standard is obviously test. For orals methyltest. For example if methyl test had an anbolic # of 150 and compound X had an anabolic # of 300 - this only means you'd have to take twice the dosage of methyltest to get the same anabolism as compound X. A:A ratios are only a comparison of potency vs each other and the relative binding affinity isn't related to the compounds A:A numbers.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. GENOMYX review and rating thread
    By dsade in forum Genomyx
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-06-2010, 08:42 PM
  2. is it wise?
    By fame126 in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-31-2010, 09:40 PM
  3. what about post rating?
    By mytime09 in forum Forum Suggestions and News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-24-2009, 02:53 PM
  4. Not wise. Closed.
    By Swirv in forum Supplements
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-27-2008, 11:19 PM
  5. Question for the wise...
    By Mar430 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-25-2007, 05:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in