Hillary Clinton: The most dishonest politician running.
- 07-03-2007, 05:47 PM
Hillary Clinton: The most dishonest politician running.
Hillary is absolutely pathetic. She has the nerve to criticize Bush's pardon of Libby while her husband pardoned countless real criminals that were actually convicted for committing real crimes. What a pathetic human being. Typical Democratic Bigotry.
"This commutation sends the clear signal that in this administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice." - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.
USDOJ: Office of the Pardon Attorney - Pardons Granted by President Clinton
- 07-03-2007, 05:49 PM
- 07-03-2007, 05:54 PM
07-03-2007, 06:03 PM
07-03-2007, 06:04 PM
07-03-2007, 06:19 PM
Anyone that votes for Hitlary will deserve it when the US gets attacked by an Iranian Nuclear weapon.
07-03-2007, 08:03 PM
07-03-2007, 08:05 PM
07-03-2007, 08:30 PM
07-03-2007, 08:37 PM
07-03-2007, 08:39 PM
on a side note: this country is fcuked either way. no matter what happens in November. no one can fix this country. we are all in a hand basket to hell.
07-03-2007, 09:06 PM
Sorry to break it to you, but the Far left Obamas have no chance at winning in 08. The Congress has a lower approval rating than Bush, and the US hates liberals. No far left candidate can ever win again. You will never see another Jimmy Carter. And the left is too stupid to nominate a moderate. America may not trust Bush, but to say they don't trust republicans is just stupid. Last election proved no one wants a frenchie wanna-be anti American socialist like Kerry. Any moderate or smart candidate from the Dems would have won by a landslide in 2004. Kerry was just way too far left. Obama is even more radical.
07-05-2007, 09:10 PM
07-05-2007, 09:20 PM
07-05-2007, 09:23 PM
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
07-05-2007, 09:25 PM
07-05-2007, 09:32 PM
She just likes to use key-talking-point words to guide her rabid sheeple.
07-06-2007, 07:10 AM
07-06-2007, 05:24 PM
Also, if you think Bush is wiping his ass with the Constitution, I cant even imagine a horrible enough analogy to the way Abe Lincoln treated it. Lincold must have wiped his ass, his dogs ass, spit upon and then soaked the constitution in nuclear waste.
Go ahead and move to Canada if you want to be surrounded by people that can call Al Quada without being monitored by the Government. I will enjoy the safety that reasonable smart countries like the US and UK provide for their citizens.
07-06-2007, 05:31 PM
Yaser Esam Hamdi
Eventually he was released without charge. If he was even remotely guilty of what they say, there's no way they would have released him. He was held for 3 years without trial and without charge. He was a US citizen. He renounced his citizenship after release and went to Saudi Arabia. The guy may be a piece of ****, but he was innocent.
07-06-2007, 06:15 PM
07-06-2007, 07:14 PM
Have there been instances of the patriot act being a problem in my personal life, of course not, have there been for others yes. In fact I was reading a story not too long ago about a ME immigrant who was thrown in jail. Keep in mind, these have long term effects.
You are so blinded by your political affiliation you do not see what is going on in front of you
07-06-2007, 07:24 PM
And I am a huge fan of Lincoln. The north won the war. If they hadn't, I cant imaging how much more blood would have been shed.
I am not blinded by a political affiliation, my eyes are quite open to reality. My eyes are closed however to paranoid delusional thoughts that my government is out to get innocent people and abuse its power. Trust me if that happens I will be the first one to sign up for a militia to overthrow it. I just don't see locking up terrorist, or a person that goes and hangs out with terrorists, or calls terrorist over seas a problem. Its a necessary step. If you dont want to go to jail, dont hang out with Osama. Its pretty simple. And I am not threatened by some terrorists getting water boarded.
07-06-2007, 07:42 PM
With regard to lincoln, the north won the war, very good. I am impressed thus far. However, you do not seem to realize that he is one of the primary reasons for executive power problems today. Also, he is not the reason for winning the war. You might want to do a bit more research on the topic.
You last paragraph really has nothing to respond to, so I will leave it as it is
07-06-2007, 08:14 PM
For all you know Hamdi could have been in Afghanistan doing volunteer humanitarian work feeding the hungry or some crap. Heck he could have been preaching non-violent and speaking out against the Taliban.
You know how we "identified" Hamdi as Taliban? We asked local warlords. We said to local warlords "we'll pay you X dollars for every Taliban member you give us." So they rounded up everyone they felt like and said "these people are Taliban, give us our money." Simple as that. That's why the Supreme Court is going to hear the cases of all the Gitmo detainees; most aren't even remotely related in any way shape or form to terrorists or the Taliban. It's why Gitmo has a good chance of being closed down soon.
You have waaaaaaaaay too much trust in your government, man. Way too much trust. Do you have any lobbyists on your payroll? If not, you shouldn't trust the government with ANYTHING.
07-06-2007, 08:44 PM
07-07-2007, 06:53 AM
07-07-2007, 08:05 AM
07-07-2007, 02:25 PM
07-07-2007, 03:28 PM
Similar Forum Threads
- By weezycon12 in forum Cycle InfoReplies: 17Last Post: 07-21-2011, 03:19 PM
- By pjorstad in forum Training ForumReplies: 94Last Post: 01-30-2009, 09:22 PM
- By YellowJacket in forum AnabolicsReplies: 9Last Post: 08-19-2004, 03:09 AM
- By ralph4u2c in forum General ChatReplies: 11Last Post: 04-09-2003, 10:03 AM
- By Trevdog in forum AnabolicsReplies: 20Last Post: 01-05-2003, 06:35 AM