Anyone else having trouble with the Diet Tracker?
-
04-14-2008 09:33 AM
Registered User
Anyone else having trouble with the Diet Tracker?
I'm having a lot of problems with the diet tracker working like it is supposed to over the past couple of days. Is anyone else experiencing this? If so, how can it be corrected?
-
04-14-2008 10:57 AM
Registered User
I started having problems today as well. Doesnt matter if I'm using IE or Firefox...still having problems removing/changing items....didnt realize how much i depend on it until it stops working right...
-
04-14-2008 07:23 PM
Registered User
I hope that someone can get it up and running soon, it's a really useful tool.
-
04-16-2008 02:48 PM
Registered User
still no worky!! I'm actually going to have to write this all down on paper.
-
04-22-2008 11:19 AM
Registered User
I tried this out today and gave it a good ten minutes trial
I think there are definite improvments needed.
-
04-22-2008 11:33 AM
Hug it out.
I just saw this thread, will look into the issues and fix them ASAP. Next time if you want us to see something right away send a PM or something, not a thread in the Nutrition forum.
-
04-22-2008 12:00 PM
Hug it out.
Fixed! Please check it out and let me know if you have any more problems.
-
04-22-2008 12:02 PM
Registered User
Thank you! Now I can get my diet back on track...
-
04-22-2008 02:34 PM
Registered User
ok how about a complete rewrite of the search algorithym? :P I typed in Rice I think it was a got a whole load of babyfood suggestions.....lol
I think if I put in ground beef in any order I should at least get all hits with entries that contain "beef & ground" in them
-
04-22-2008 02:36 PM
Hug it out.
We found 127 results that matched "rice".
It only shows 15 results per page, you have to click through the pages to find what you need, or be more specific in your search. Every result it shows has the word rice in it's name.
-
04-22-2008 02:57 PM
Registered User
I understand this maybe a little out of scope but the search sucks or at least the way it searches sucks. The problem is that when I put in "rice" the results that are in results 46 - 60 should be on page one. I mean really I'm not looking for babyfood WITH rice etc but most like rice. I am pretty sure you guys didn't program the search engine used for this so not much we can do about it.
If I enter 'Rice' the first entry returned should not be
Babyfood > jalepeno peppers and rice flavour
but
Rice
Rice > Long Grain > Raw
etc
I did some testing and it appears being much more specific is better.....or just browsing / custom. I guess the problem lies in single keyword searches. The reason this is a problem to me is because the engine makes me conform to it, not the other way round. It should serve me not, that I have to give it everything it needs before it will help me. Anyway....just my 2c
-
04-22-2008 03:01 PM
Hug it out.
I'll see what I can do, but remember, we're not Google.
Will try my best. Relevancy is a matter of personal opinion. What may seem most relevant to you, may not be what seems most relevant to someone else. Granted, no one is probably looking for baby food containing rice when they search for rice, but you get my point.
Originally Posted by
neoborn
I understand this maybe a little out of scope but the search sucks or at least the way it searches sucks. The problem is that when I put in "rice" the results that are in results 46 - 60 should be on page one. I mean really I'm not looking for babyfood WITH rice etc but most like rice. I am pretty sure you guys didn't program the search engine used for this so not much we can do about it.
If I enter 'Rice' the first entry returned should not be
Babyfood > jalepeno peppers and rice flavour
but
Rice
Rice > Long Grain > Raw
etc
anyhoo....just saying
-
04-22-2008 03:10 PM
Registered User
I do. Thanks for the feedback.
-
04-22-2008 04:24 PM
Hug it out.
Try your search for rice again... That should be at least a LITTLE better / relevant. If I can get it any better, I will. But this should help a bit.
-
04-22-2008 10:42 PM
Registered User
Thanks Costanza. I understand that it would have been better to send you guys a pm instead of starting a thread in the nutrition forum and that's exactly what I did. I received no direct response from AM, but was thrilled to see you guys went the extra mile to get it running smoothly again as of today. Thanks, again.
-
04-22-2008 11:12 PM
Registered User
Would it be possible to add in some current bodybuilding favourites like greens powder and various protein powders? I don't mind addding them as custom foods, it's fun and easy... but the system doesn't like it when I try to enter fractional amounts, and that makes it hard to enter some of the vitamin and mineral values and other details. Since this tracker will let me know about my vitamin intake, I'd be happy if it counted my greens.
-
04-23-2008 09:21 AM
Hug it out.
Working on allowing fractional values, will update here when thats done!
-
04-23-2008 09:28 AM
I am faster than 80% of all snakes
Originally Posted by
tmilam
I received no direct response from AM,
Who did you PM?
-
04-23-2008 11:10 AM
Registered User
Originally Posted by
Costanza
Working on allowing fractional values, will update here when thats done!
Thank you! That will make customising much easier.
Also, thank you for inventing the rubber band. Those really come in handy sometimes.
-
04-23-2008 01:11 PM
Hug it out.
You're slightly confused. We didn't invent the rubber band, it was the paper clip.
Similar Forum Threads
-
By WarcraftJJS in forum Weight Loss
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-11-2011, 12:40 PM
-
By GuyverX in forum General Chat
Replies: 0
Last Post: 09-05-2009, 01:18 PM
-
By Patuba in forum Forum Suggestions and News
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-03-2009, 11:20 AM
-
By frizzlerock in forum Weight Loss
Replies: 3
Last Post: 02-10-2009, 08:48 AM
-
By Palo Alto Labs in forum General Chat
Replies: 42
Last Post: 03-18-2008, 01:49 PM