Best macronutrient split for LEAN MASS/ BODYBUILDING
- 07-10-2007, 05:59 PM
Best macronutrient split for LEAN MASS/ BODYBUILDING
in your opinion, which is the best split? i added the middle two just so that there'd be more of a selection, but it's really a choice between 40/40/20 and 33/33/33 IMO. From what I've heard from others, the latter is supposedly ideal for bodybuilding and encouraging lean mass, but I haven't heard anything of this theory myself. I'm not interested in bulking persay. Simply acquiring totally lean, pure mass gains. What do you think?
- 07-11-2007, 07:34 AM
Well it really depends...lean mass diet and bodybuilding diets are not the same.
Also, different people put this ratios in different orders, so what exactly did you mean?
- 07-11-2007, 08:44 AM
But as a bodybuilder, if you weren't interested in heavy mass bulking at the moment and wanted to lean out gradually, while maintaining muscle mass and STILL gaining lean mass, which macronutrient split would be ideal for accomplishing that?
33/33/33 seems interesting. cept where's the other 1 %? haha
07-11-2007, 09:04 AM
07-11-2007, 09:06 AM
I meant both.
But thanks for the clarification.
I personally use 50P/35C/15F and see decent gains while keeping lean.
07-11-2007, 09:07 AM
i always assume a protein/ carb/ fat split. i guess different people have different interpretations of that, but for the purposes of this discussion that was the order I was inferring.
but this opens up some good discussion, since by that logic there are countless different splits you can have.
07-11-2007, 09:34 AM
07-11-2007, 07:55 PM
I see people say 40/40/20 which I am usually at about that.
But then I see people say that 500 grams of protein is WAY too much. Well if you need 5000 cals a day how you going to do the 40/40/20?
Sleep Supplement 3Z BCAA: Red Raspberry and Lemon flavors
HGH/sleep enhancer: HGHpro
Test Booster: TestoPRO and STOKED!
Preworkout: MANIAC Fruit Punch and Pink Lemonade
07-13-2007, 01:26 PM
I bulk w/ a 40/40/20 to kinda stay lean, only adding maybe a 1/2" to my waist and .5 or 1% BF over about 6-8 weeks.
For an all out bulk (winter time when i never take my shirt off) I follow about a 30/50/20 split
Serious Nutrition Solutions Representative
07-22-2007, 01:47 AM
I pray for the day where 33/34/33 becomes the way to go.
07-22-2007, 12:04 PM
07-22-2007, 02:13 PM
For cutting I like 50% protein, 30% carbs, 20% fat
Bulking/Recomp I like 40% protein, 40% carbs, 20% fat
07-22-2007, 07:22 PM
I don't really like using percentages. I'll quasi quote something from alan aragon's book. He suggests assigning fairly constant numbers for protein and fat (atleast 1 gram of protein per pound of target body weight and .4-.5 grams of fat per pound of tar. bdy. weight). Then however many calories you are trying to consume after that, you fill with carbs. So basically, what you are trying to do body composition wise determines how many carbs you eat; this makes the most sense to me.
08-15-2007, 11:25 AM
One should never go below 40% carbohydrates to lose bodyfat. A certain amount of carbohydrate is needed in the diet to effectively burn fat as fuel. Carbohydrates are the "primer" for igniting the fat burning process.
I like 40/30/30 (C,P,F) split. If your cutting carbs you will need fat in your diet to keep your calories up and prevent muscle wasting.
09-01-2007, 05:57 PM
In my opinion, there's no evidence that one should not get below 40% carbohydrates. The choice of your macronutrient ratio depends on your body's ability to handle carbohydrates. Some people react extremely well to low carb diets, ( Think about the anabolic diet, worked great for a lot of people) and some other people just cannot stand those diets.
I honestly think that there is no such "perfect" ratio that would fit everyone. It's up to one to experiment and find the ratio that fits with his/her body.
I use a 33/33/33 ratio for workout days and I lower the carbohydrates on non-trainning days.
09-12-2007, 03:44 PM
i think splits should be goal-oriented. if you're bulking, you're most likely going to opt for a split that loads up on carbs and healthy fats, while maintaining a high protein intake. if you're eating simply to maintain and accrue lean mass, 40/40/20 is probably your best bet. likewise, 50/35/15 or something along those lines is ideal for cutting.
09-12-2007, 04:14 PM
09-27-2007, 05:35 PM
I tend to go a little lower carb... So MINE looks more like 50/30/20... or maybe 50/35/15.....
I know i know... i'm crazy... i just HATE those DAMN love handles and have worked WAY to hard to get rid of them! LOL I won't put on QUITE as much gains quite as quickly.. but it seems to put on about 4lbs a month of LEAN SOLID mass if i am dedicated to it...
ALSO... if i am on a ProHormone cyce or something... i will up the carbs a little more... BUt thats about the only time..
10-05-2007, 11:32 AM
I would have to say that there is no magic ratio for putting on lean mass, as every individuals metabolism and hormones are different and react differently to what they eat. however, there are certain ratios that promote fat loss, lean gains, etc. It is up to each individual to attempt to find what is right for them by tracking their body's reaction to the foods that are being eaten, ie energy levels, fat gains, lbm gains. For instance, you will find no definitive solution for yourself through this thread. You will have to try out 40/40/20 macros, 45/35/20 macros, etc. The only way you will find out is by listening to what the body tells you.
with that being said I gain real well with an approx. 45P/35C/20F
10-05-2007, 02:32 PM
In my opinion, low CHO diets are for people who want to alter body composition with minimal effort.
10-05-2007, 03:04 PM
my diet today consists of alternating between a high carb, low carb split. in conjunction with a three day DC program, higher carbs on training days, low carbs (max = 1 g per lb) on off days w cardio. so far i've found this type of diet split to be effective. i'm leaning out and making gains simultaneously. to be practical, i think it's a waste of energy to count calories and follow EXACT macro splits. to have a macro split, you need to know your ideal caloric range and go from there, but it's better just to go by feel with every meal and go by what you see in the mirror from day to day I think. as an example, if you're looking to do a lean bulk per se, don't go overboard with the carbs at each meal. i'd say eat anywhere between 20 and 60, always keep the protein high, or alternate between low carb/ high fat meals and high carb meals.
case in point, progress is very feasible without the added stress of dieting to a T and counting every calorie
11-08-2007, 08:33 PM
In theory, protein is the macro that is least likely to be stored as fat, followed by carbohydrate. Fat is the macro that is most likely to be stored as fat. Conversion requires energy and the body does not like to waste it. Consequently a lean mass macro combination will be high in protein, moderate in carbs, and low in fat.
The downside is that protein is an inefficient energy source. Strength and total muscle gains are usually better with a more balanced ratio.
As always, this argument is only valid for comparable calorie intakes.
11-13-2007, 01:20 PM
11-13-2007, 03:00 PM
11-13-2007, 05:02 PM
for the longest time, my problem was that i was having way too much of every macro. not necessarily bad for bulking purposes, but otherwise not for looking good lol. my protein count was 1.5 times my total body weight, fat included, and my carbs were upwards of 400 g per day. fats i didn't even count. needless to say, since i re-calculated and lowered everything, i've very much liked the results.
12-13-2007, 06:29 PM
For all the fat haters please post sources...
My diet consists of 35P/5C/60F
12-14-2007, 12:02 AM
12-14-2007, 08:55 AM
12-14-2007, 09:10 AM
12-16-2007, 10:51 AM
question about calories, im at about 2450 calories per day, and still can't lose stubborn weight around lower love handle area, should i go lower? im doing 40/30/30 but the thing is i see lots of guys on here bulking on 4k calories and cutting around 2600, and if i did that i would never lose weight, but then again looking at those figures i get scared to cut my calories and don't want to lose muscle mass.
199 - 203 lbs
12-16-2007, 11:17 AM
12-16-2007, 12:45 PM
one more question regarding cardio, as mentioned before i want to avoid losing muscle mass, so i've been doing slow paced cardio 2 times a week, which supposedly best for losing fat and not muscle mass. is a pace of 3.5 on a treadmill from 35-45min sound about right?
12-16-2007, 03:32 PM
HIIT (high intensity interval training) actually raises your BMR for the next 24 hours, so the net benefit is higher than the slower cardio. This is why I usually suggest 2 sessions of 20 min HIIT + 1-2 longer slower sessions (assuming no health problems prevent the HIIT) weekly.
I wouldn't worry about losing muscle as long as you don't do fasted cardio.
12-16-2007, 04:08 PM
12-16-2007, 07:16 PM
01-06-2008, 10:22 AM
04-05-2011, 02:10 PM
And by the same token, if you require 4500-5000 cals a day and want to do a 40/40/20 split, how in the hell are you going to stay lean taking in 450-500g of carbs a day, no f'ing way.
I should note that I'm assuming people usually put a 40/40/20 split in the form of protein/carbs/fat when talking about adding lean muscle. Thus the question, how are you going to stay lean on 450-500g of carbs a day, lol.
04-05-2011, 03:00 PM
well, like someone else said earlier in the thread, you assign a minimum for protein, a minimum for healthy fats and where the calories come from after that isn't really important. The idea that a certain % macro distribution is important is silly.
I'm not sure why you think you couldn't stay lean at 400g carbs though, I know plenty of people that do. if you are one of the 6-8 meals a day people, thats 50-65g per meai, which isn't much and easily comes from low GI sources.
This space for rent
Phenadrol Log http://anabolicminds.com/forum/suppl...-hell-did.html - AMAZING fat loss results so far
04-05-2011, 03:05 PM
yah, I eat 7, but I really don't think I could stay lean on over 400g of carbs, no matter where they are coming from.
you know what, now that I think about it, why isn't 40/30/30 an option on this poll?
edit: I actually took my carbs up to 35-40 percent for two days and I blew up like a mofo, my gut looked like I was pregnant. Maybe just an adjustment period for a larger daily carb intake? Or I just really don't agree with carbs, lol.
04-06-2011, 10:30 AM
Is this Fat / Protein / Carb?
Or what? Cause I chose 40/40/20 with that premise
Androhard + Andromass Log
Similar Forum Threads
- By Dynasty90 in forum SupplementsReplies: 0Last Post: 01-24-2012, 01:52 PM
- By freqfly in forum AnabolicsReplies: 3Last Post: 06-09-2007, 03:51 PM
- By Digphelps in forum Weight LossReplies: 1Last Post: 04-09-2007, 09:01 PM
- By smokey the bear in forum AnabolicsReplies: 3Last Post: 10-15-2006, 05:58 PM
- By mickjagger in forum AnabolicsReplies: 3Last Post: 04-29-2004, 08:45 PM