Thoughts about Splenda

  1. Registered User
    Pitbull954's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,674
    Rep Power
    967
    Level
    27
    Lv. Percent
    33.02%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Thoughts about Splenda


    Does anyone know if this product is bad for you? I don't use alot of it per week at most 1/4 cup. The stuff taste just as good as sugar!

  2. Registered User
    Pitbull954's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,674
    Rep Power
    967
    Level
    27
    Lv. Percent
    33.02%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    I just ran across this. I'm gonna research alot more of this product! http://www.mercola.com/2000/dec/3/sucralose_dangers.htm
  3. Registered User
    not_big_enuf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,102
    Rep Power
    671
    Level
    25
    Lv. Percent
    88.99%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    They've uncovered some dirt on it, but come on, everything will effect someone negatively. Sugar is basically a nice way to increase your calories with zero nutritional value and help your blood sugar shoot it's load. Splenda, on the other hand, though it has a trace of calories, does not spike blood sugar. I'm sure some day it'll cause cancer, like everything else in this world and people will freak out about it, just like aspartame. I think quite a few have been drinking multiple diet cokes for DECADES and they're not falling over dead.

    Quote Originally Posted by anabolanimal
    I have always been so curious about this stuff also...although it is expensive I always have some handy...it's good for just about anything just like real sugar...kool-aid, coffee, you name it...I have always wondered about the health consequences of it too...i know it is better than artificial sweeteners but am unsure as to how much better it is for you as compared to sugar...
    •   
       

  4. Registered User
    Pitbull954's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,674
    Rep Power
    967
    Level
    27
    Lv. Percent
    33.02%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by not_big_enuf
    They've uncovered some dirt on it, but come on, everything will effect someone negatively. Sugar is basically a nice way to increase your calories with zero nutritional value and help your blood sugar shoot it's load. Splenda, on the other hand, though it has a trace of calories, does not spike blood sugar. I'm sure some day it'll cause cancer, like everything else in this world and people will freak out about it, just like aspartame. I think quite a few have been drinking multiple diet cokes for DECADES and they're not falling over dead.
    Thats what I say I have been eating this for along time now and it has not affected me what so ever!

    I'm curious what Bobo has to say about it?
  5. Registered User
    Pitbull954's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,674
    Rep Power
    967
    Level
    27
    Lv. Percent
    33.02%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    My searching skills are off today lol I just ran across this on AM....... Splenda is EVERYWHERE The last post on some good info in it.
  6. Registered User
    wrkn4bigrmusles's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  206 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    35
    Posts
    708
    Rep Power
    463
    Level
    21
    Lv. Percent
    15.46%

    heres some knowledge for ya....

    The Hidden Chemicals In Splenda®

    By Dr. Janet Starr Hull


    People may think Johnson & Johnson’s Splenda®, made from sucralose, has “come to the rescue” as the newest chemical sugar replacement “made from real sugar.” People don’t want to hear that it may be just as dangerous as aspartame, and this “white knight” of sweeteners is no improvement.

    So, what exactly is Splenda? Splenda is the trade name for sucralose. Johnson & Johnson bought the rights in 1998 to sell sucralose in the United States as Splenda. Its basic characteristics are:

    * Its taste is nearly identical to sugar because it’s made from sugar
    * Its “trademark” inability to break down in processing or in storage
    But Splenda is potentially harmful because it contains chlorine, which is a carcinogen. The Splenda marketers insist the chlorine is chemically “bound” so it cannot be “released” in the body during digestion. I question that, and wonder if this artificial chemical can safely pass through the human body. Wait until you discover what chlorine can do to the body. Then, you decide if you want to ingest this chemical.

    Splenda (sucralose) is created in the lab, using a complex process involving dozens of chemicals you and I can barely pronounce - let alone consume. Basically, the chemists force chlorine into an unnatural chemical bond with a sugar molecule, resulting in a sweeter product, but at a price: a huge amount of artificial chemicals must be added to keep sucralose from digesting in our bodies. These toxic substances prevent (hopefully) the dangerous chlorine molecules from detaching from the sugar molecule inside the digestive system, which would be a carcinogenic hazard.

    To illustrate the alarming “chemical soup” required to create sucralose, I have listed here the actual process for producing this sweetener. I highlighted the chemicals in bold type for emphasis.

    According to the Splenda International Patent A23L001-236 and PEP Review #90-1-4 (July 1991), sucralose is synthesized by this five-step process:
    1. sucrose is tritylated with trityl chloride in the presence of dimethylformamide and 4-methylmorpholine and the tritylated sucrose is then acetylated with acetic anhydride,

    2. the resulting TRISPA (6,1',6'-tri-O-trityl-penta-O-acetylsucrose) is chlorinated with hydrogen chloride in the presence of toluene,

    3. the resulting 4-PAS (sucrose 2,3,4,3',4'-pentaacetate) is heated in the presence of methyl isobutyl ketone and acetic acid,

    4. the resulting 6-PAS (sucrose 2,3,6,3',4'-pentaacetate) is chlorinated with thionyl chloride in the presence of toluene and benzyltriethylammonium chloride, and

    5. the resulting TOSPA (sucralose pentaacetate) is treated with methanol (wood alcohol, a poison) in the presence of sodium methoxide to produce sucralose.

    The Splenda marketers stress that sucralose is “made from sugar but is derived from this sugar through a process that selectively substitutes three atoms of chlorine for three hydrogen-oxygen groups on the sucrose molecule.” While this is true, it is a deceptively simple description, implying that sucralose is just a benign sugar with a touch of chlorine, and thereby, safe for consumption. According to research on the hydrolysis of sugars, just the process of inserting chlorine into the sugar molecule (hydrolysis means breaking it into smaller molecules) ultimately allows these chemicals to penetrate the intestinal wall.

    So sucralose becomes a “low-calorie” sugar with a complicated process that results in Splenda’s chemical formula: 1,6-dichloro-1, 6-dideoxy-BETA-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranoside.

    This is Splenda. They say it is a perfectly safe sugar molecule.

    Sucralose is patented as a manmade “chlorinated sucrose sweetener” and it is registered as “chlorinated sucrose.” Chlorinated sucrose is not found anywhere in nature, like real sugar (sucrose) that is extracted from sugar cane and sugar beets. Chlorinated sucrose exists because of man.

    The FDA states in their Final Report on Splenda that sucralose is “produced at an approximate purity of ninety-eight percent.” The other two percent does not have to be reported to the FDA, nor listed as added ingredients. So what’s in the other two percent? The chemicals used to synthesize sucralose in the five-step process:

    1. Acetone
    2. Acetic acid
    3. Acetyl alcohol
    4. Acetic anhydride
    5. Ammonium chloride
    6. Benzene
    7. Chlorinated sulfates
    8. Ethyl alcohol
    9. Isobutyl ketones
    10. Formaldehyde
    11. Hydrogen chloride
    12. Lithium chloride
    13. Methanol
    14. Sodium methoxide
    15. Sulfuryl chloride
    16. Trityl chloride
    17. Toluene
    18. Thionyl chloride

    Although manufacturing guidelines specify limits on these veiled substances, there are no assurances these limits have been met since they do not have to be reported. In addition, the FDA does not presently require an Environmental Impact Statement for sucralose, so it’s open season for the rules, at present.

    Now you can see why I do not recommend sucralose for pregnancy or for children, especially after reading this list.

    It’s time to admit that there is no free ticket to eating all the sugar-free products you desire without paying the high price of harming your body in the long run. The “technology of foods” (artificial sweeteners and manmade foods) has gone too far, and will not secure eternal health, beauty, slimness, or youth. Laboratory chemicals are not the answer.
  7. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.82%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    everything in moderation. I'm sure if you use it on everything in large amounts you possibly could get negative health results but what do you think would happen if you injested large amounts of regular sugar on a consistant basis?
  8. New Member
    turkish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    32
    Posts
    282
    Rep Power
    259
    Level
    14
    Lv. Percent
    41.52%

    Quote Originally Posted by Pitbull954
    I just ran across this. I'm gonna research alot more of this product! http://www.mercola.com/2000/dec/3/sucralose_dangers.htm
    I wouldn't trust that guy.
  9. Registered User
    Pitbull954's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,674
    Rep Power
    967
    Level
    27
    Lv. Percent
    33.02%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by turkish
    I wouldn't trust that guy.

    Yeah its like everything, 1 day air is gonna cause HIV ya know, like a few others said as long as you don't take in too much you'll be fine!!!
  10. New Member
    turkish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Age
    32
    Posts
    282
    Rep Power
    259
    Level
    14
    Lv. Percent
    41.52%

    Quote Originally Posted by Pitbull954
    Yeah its like everything, 1 day air is gonna cause HIV ya know, like a few others said as long as you don't take in too much you'll be fine!!!
    True, + he sells stevia.
  11. Registered User
    Iron Warrior's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  265 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    5,328
    Rep Power
    13070
    Level
    51
    Lv. Percent
    28.89%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    I've been using Splenda for like 4 years and I'm not dead. BTW, Mercola is dead wrong on this and aspartame, he's just a salesman and will create hype to his advantage.
  12. Registered User
    rocketscientist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    46
    Posts
    227
    Rep Power
    220
    Level
    12
    Lv. Percent
    73.18%

    From what I read there are really very little facts in these articles. Most are just speculation (didn't read the splenda vs. aspartame one because I didn't want to sign up for that site). And there is also a pretty big initiative by the sugar industry with law suits etc. to damage splenda. So I wouldn't be surprised if that some of the motivation came from that direction.

    And as someone already said - sugar being supposedly 'healthy' is somewhat questionable as well... I dare to say if we cut sugar from our diets (in the sense of adding sugar to foods), the average american would be a lot healthier (and skinnier).
  13. Board Supporter
    Nitrox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,303
    Rep Power
    804
    Level
    27
    Lv. Percent
    12.03%
    Achievements Posting Pro
  14. New Member
    savagebeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8
    Rep Power
    109
    Level
    2
    Lv. Percent
    72.17%

    i love splenda!!!!!
  15. Board Supporter
    scott72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    42
    Posts
    807
    Rep Power
    538
    Level
    22
    Lv. Percent
    15.28%

    Quote Originally Posted by savagebeast
    i love splenda!!!!!
    Same here. I tried Stevia and almost puked..It tastes like chemicals..Splenda all the way for me..
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. has any1 thought about this? i think its somewhat funny
    By East1600Plus in forum General Chat
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-04-2007, 01:48 AM
  2. Intresting thought about ecdysterone
    By BryanM in forum Supplements
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-20-2005, 01:56 AM
  3. Second thoughts about M1T
    By MoonCricket in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 02-05-2005, 10:40 PM
  4. My thoughts about a 4AD/4OHT cycle
    By Syr in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 12-22-2004, 12:50 PM
  5. Thoughts about mixing your own injectables
    By Matthew D in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-28-2002, 03:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in