Supreme Court Bans Death Penalty for Child Rape

Page 1 of 2 12 Last
  1. Senior Member
    slow-mun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,149
    Rep Power
    1175
    Level
    33
    Lv. Percent
    80.41%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Supreme Court Bans Death Penalty for Child Rape


    Thoughts on this one.........

    Court bans death penalty for child rape

    By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer 21 minutes ago

    The Supreme Court declared Wednesday that executions are too severe a punishment for raping children, despite the "years of long anguish" for victims, in a ruling that restricts the death penalty to murder and crimes against the state.

    The court's 5-4 decision struck down a Louisiana law that allows capital punishment for people convicted of raping children under 12. It spares the only people in the U.S. under sentence of death for that crime two Louisiana men convicted of raping girls 5 and 8.

    The ruling also invalidates laws on the books in five other states that allowed executions for child rape that does not result in the death of the victim.

    However devastating the crime to children, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in his majority opinion, "the death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child." His four liberal colleagues joined him, while the four more conservative justices dissented.

    There has not been an execution in the United States for a crime that did not also involve the death of the victim in 44 years, a factor that weighed in Kennedy's decision.

    Rape and other crimes "may be as devastating in their harm, as here, but 'in terms of moral depravity and of the injury to the person and to the public,' they cannot be compared to murder in their 'severity and irrevocability,'" Kennedy said, quoting from earlier decisions.

    The victim in the case decided Wednesday was an 8-year-old girl raped by her stepfather at their home in Harvey, La., outside New Orleans.

    Angry Louisianans who backed the law said the court was out of touch.

    "The opinion reads more like an out-of-control legislative debate than a constitutional analysis," said Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican. "One thing is clear: The five members of the court who issued the opinion do not share the same 'standards of decency' as the people of Louisiana."

    With the court already on record this term reaffirming the constitutionality of capital punishment in a case dealing with lethal injection, Kennedy dwelt at length on the need to limit the death penalty to the most heinous killings.

    The decision allows death sentences to continue to be imposed for crimes such as treason, espionage and terrorism, which Kennedy labeled as crimes against the state.

    The Supreme Court banned executions for rape in 1977 in a case in which the victim was an adult woman.

    Forty-four states prohibit the death penalty for any kind of rape, and five states besides Louisiana have allowed it for child rapists Georgia, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas.

    The court struggled over how to apply standards laid out in decisions barring executions for the mentally retarded and people younger than 18 when they committed murder. In those cases, the court cited trends in the states away from capital punishment.

    In this case, proponents of the Louisiana law said the trend was toward the death penalty, a point mentioned by Justice Samuel Alito in his dissent.

    "The harm that is caused to the victims and to society at large by the worst child rapists is grave," Alito wrote. "It is the judgment of the Louisiana lawmakers and those in an increasing number of other states that these harms justify the death penalty."

    But Kennedy said the absence of any recent executions for rape and the small number of states that allow it demonstrate "there is a national consensus against capital punishment for the crime of child rape."

    Kennedy acknowledged that the decision had to come to terms with "the years of long anguish that must be endured by the victim of child rape."

    Still, he concluded that in cases of crimes against individuals, "the death penalty should not be expanded to instances where the victim's life was not taken."

    He also cited arguments made by social workers and others that children and their families might not cooperate with authorities if a death sentence could result against the rapist. In many cases, including the one before the court, the victim and rapist are related.

    The author of the Louisiana law, former Republican state Rep. Pete Schneider, said even opponents of the death penalty told him they would kill anyone who raped their children. "When are you going to have the courage to stand up for what's right for all of the people but especially the children under 12 that have been brutally raped by monsters?" Schneider demanded, directing his comments to the justices in Wednesday's majority.

    The last executions for crimes other than murder took place in 1964, according to a database maintained by the Death Penalty Information Center.

    Ronald Wolfe, 34, died in Missouri's gas chamber on May 8, 1964, for rape. James Coburn was electrocuted in Alabama on Sept. 4 of that year for robbery.

    The case before the court involved Patrick Kennedy, 43, who was sentenced to death for the rape of his 8-year-old stepdaughter in Louisiana.

    Kennedy was convicted in 2003. The girl initially told police she was sorting Girl Scout cookies in the garage when two boys assaulted her.

    Police arrested Kennedy a couple of weeks after the March 1998 rape, but more than 20 months passed before the girl identified him as her attacker.

    His defense attorney at the time argued that blood testing was inconclusive and that the victim was pressed to change her story.

    The Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the sentence, saying that "short of first-degree murder, we can think of no other non-homicide crime more deserving" of the death penalty. State Chief Justice Pascal Calogero noted in dissent that the U.S. high court already had made clear that capital punishment could not be imposed without the death of the victim, except possibly for espionage or treason.

    The girl's mother was reached by The Associated Press following the court's decision Wednesday. "We don't talk about that," she said and hung up.

    A second Louisiana defendant, Richard Davis, was given the death penalty in December for repeatedly raping a 5-year-old girl in Caddo Parish.

    Local prosecutor Lea Hall told jurors: "Execute this man. Justice has a sword and this sword needs to swing today." Both men will get new sentences.

    The case is Kennedy v. Louisiana, 07-343.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Janet McConnaughey contributed to this report from New Orleans.

  2. Senior Member
    futurepilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,217
    Rep Power
    1288
    Level
    35
    Lv. Percent
    54.44%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    We need to legalize dueling.
  3. Elite Member
    SilentBob187's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  175 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    30
    Posts
    7,851
    Rep Power
    11115
    Level
    57
    Lv. Percent
    25.69%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by futurepilot View Post
    We need to legalize dueling.
    x2.

    I am disappointed in the supreme court on this one.
    "I am legally blind and if I can Squat,deadlift and over all get myself to the gym then anyone can get their a$$ in gear and get strong!!" - malleus25
    WHITE WHALE!
    •   
       

  4. Senior Member
    b unit's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  242 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,646
    Rep Power
    1424
    Level
    37
    Lv. Percent
    67.62%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    The decision allows death sentences to continue to be imposed for crimes such as treason, espionage and terrorism, which Kennedy labeled as crimes against the state.
    children are the future and are just as important as "the state"

    it's a deplorable decision!
  5. NutraPlanet Fanatic
    dsade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    44
    Posts
    21,468
    Rep Power
    774675
    Level
    86
    Lv. Percent
    26.79%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    I would support life in prison, and death in cases of mutilation of children...but for just rape, I actually think they made the right call.
    Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
    BPS - Where Body meets Performance
    Flawless Skin Couture - We give you the tools to make you Flawless
  6. Senior Member
    futurepilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,217
    Rep Power
    1288
    Level
    35
    Lv. Percent
    54.44%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by dsade View Post
    just rape.
    If any of your family members, or close friends ever get raped/molested, remember you said that it was "just" rape.
  7. Senior Member
    b unit's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  242 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,646
    Rep Power
    1424
    Level
    37
    Lv. Percent
    67.62%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    a child who's been violated suffers a life sentence so why should the offender, their innocence is mutilated and spirit destroyed.

    save tax $$$ and send them were they belong, six feet under
  8. Senior Member
    mindgame's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  207 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,211
    Rep Power
    691
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    80.49%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    i say let the prison inmates have them. Child molesters have it worse in prison.
  9. Senior Member
    Fastone's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  220 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,312
    Rep Power
    838
    Level
    27
    Lv. Percent
    31.42%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mindgame View Post
    i say let the prison inmates have them. Child molesters have it worse in prison.


    Death is too easy, they should be made to suffer like hell on earth.

    :bruce3:
  10. NutraPlanet Fanatic
    dsade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    44
    Posts
    21,468
    Rep Power
    774675
    Level
    86
    Lv. Percent
    26.79%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by futurepilot View Post
    If any of your family members, or close friends ever get raped/molested, remember you said that it was "just" rape.
    As a matter of fact, they have...so don't presume to know what I think.

    Just the same as someone who falls victim to robbery would love to "kill the mother****er" who ripped him off, there has to be some temperance and ****ing rational thought that guides out judicial system - we are not savages.

    When a life is not taken, then there had better be some ****ing serious other damage done to even consider a death penalty.
    Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
    BPS - Where Body meets Performance
    Flawless Skin Couture - We give you the tools to make you Flawless
  11. bigironkiller's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  260 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    949
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    24
    Lv. Percent
    76.96%

    rape of a child should constitute the death penalty. but they would have to make provision to intervene when the facts involve say a 18yr old and a minor, that would need a special clause. but for an aged adult of over 21 raping a minor, they shouldnt have the luxuary of having a "relatively" easy life in prison.
  12. NutraPlanet Fanatic
    dsade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    44
    Posts
    21,468
    Rep Power
    774675
    Level
    86
    Lv. Percent
    26.79%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by bigironkiller View Post
    rape of a child should constitute the death penalty. but they would have to make provision to intervene when the facts involve say a 18yr old and a minor, that would need a special clause. but for an aged adult of over 21 raping a minor, they shouldnt have the luxuary of having a "relatively" easy life in prison.
    Can you explain how you came to this conclusion? What criteria constitutes "should"?

    Hell, bullying damages kids for life sometimes...death penalty for bullying!!


    Side Note: I can't say that something horrific like this happening again to a loved one would not push me to take my own revenge, but we are discussing standards of a civil society, and these concepts have to be defended and placed in perspective. I'm sure 350 years ago it made perfect "sense" to execute witches.
    Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
    BPS - Where Body meets Performance
    Flawless Skin Couture - We give you the tools to make you Flawless
  13. Senior Member
    futurepilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,217
    Rep Power
    1288
    Level
    35
    Lv. Percent
    54.44%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by dsade View Post
    don't presume to know what I think.

    Just the same as someone who falls victim to robbery

    we are not savages.

    No presumption neeeded, you clearly stated the it was "just rape".

    Robbery is nowhere near as morally repugnant as rape.

    Depends on your definition of civilized, along with who you would consider savage.

    That child will NEVER lead a completely normal life. People that would rape a child no longer deserve a place in my world.
  14. Senior Member
    b unit's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  242 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,646
    Rep Power
    1424
    Level
    37
    Lv. Percent
    67.62%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    if someone raped my 8 year old daughter or son, i'd make sure that f*cker paid and paid dearly.

    the judicial system is flawed with it comes to victims rights.
  15. NutraPlanet Fanatic
    dsade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    44
    Posts
    21,468
    Rep Power
    774675
    Level
    86
    Lv. Percent
    26.79%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by futurepilot View Post
    No presumption neeeded, you clearly stated the it was "just rape".

    Robbery is nowhere near as morally repugnant as rape.

    Depends on your definition of civilized, along with who you would consider savage.

    That child will NEVER lead a completely normal life. People that would rape a child no longer deserve a place in my world.
    Actually, if you read my post I used the phrase "just rape" to differentiate it from, say, rape/torture or rape/mutliation, etc. - extenuating circumstances that, in my view, WOULD warrant a death penalty.

    It was not used to downplay or trivialize rape.
    Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
    BPS - Where Body meets Performance
    Flawless Skin Couture - We give you the tools to make you Flawless
  16. bigironkiller's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  260 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    949
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    24
    Lv. Percent
    76.96%

    Quote Originally Posted by dsade View Post
    Can you explain how you came to this conclusion? What criteria constitutes "should"?

    Hell, bullying damages kids for life sometimes...death penalty for bullying!!


    Side Note: I can't say that something horrific like this happening again to a loved one would not push me to take my own revenge, but we are discussing standards of a civil society, and these concepts have to be defended and placed in perspective. I'm sure 350 years ago it made perfect "sense" to execute witches.
    DSADE, i dont know how could be more clear.
    1. statutory rape scenario: 18yr old with a 16yr old: no death penalty
    2. obvious case of an over 21 adult raping a young child, 10yrs or less: death penalty
    3. any obvious malicious rape of a child by an adult: death npenalty

    scenario 1: needs to be made fully clear that a teen sexual relations deemed statutory, but not malicious need not be a death penalty. im sure you know and society would know what needs be in place to kill a child rapist. and if you think a child rapist doesnt deserve the death penalty, i cant see how you come to that conclusion.....
  17. Senior Member
    slow-mun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,149
    Rep Power
    1175
    Level
    33
    Lv. Percent
    80.41%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    I posted this article because I actually live in Louisiana and I was wondering what others thought about it looking on the outside. I'd probably say that the majority of our state believes that the death penalty should be an option as a sentence for this type of crime under certain circumstances. The thing that everyone needs to realize is that not every child rapist receives this type of judgment for their crime. I can understand that some people oppose the death penalty for crimes that did not involve murder or flat out oppose it altogether, but this is one of those instances where you have to stop and ask yourself "how horrid was the crime involving child rape that it resulted in a death sentence?" I'm more pro-death than pro-life in this argument, but I could probably live with a child rapist getting life in prison, but only if they were guaranteed to be living in the general population and in not some sort of protected custody.
  18. Senior Member
    b unit's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  242 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,646
    Rep Power
    1424
    Level
    37
    Lv. Percent
    67.62%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by slow-mun View Post
    I'm more pro-death than pro-life in this argument, but I could probably live with a child rapist getting life in prison, but only if they were guaranteed to be living in the general population and in not some sort of protected custody.
    that's what really bugs me about protective custody for child rapists, why should they be protected in prision?
  19. Advanced Member
    MuscleBound1337's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    928
    Rep Power
    574
    Level
    23
    Lv. Percent
    85.44%

    Quote Originally Posted by bigironkiller View Post
    DSADE, i dont know how could be more clear.
    1. statutory rape scenario: 18yr old with a 16yr old: no death penalty
    2. obvious case of an over 21 adult raping a young child, 10yrs or less: death penalty
    3. any obvious malicious rape of a child by an adult: death npenalty

    scenario 1: needs to be made fully clear that a teen sexual relations deemed statutory, but not malicious need not be a death penalty. im sure you know and society would know what needs be in place to kill a child rapist. and if you think a child rapist doesnt deserve the death penalty, i cant see how you come to that conclusion.....
    I think most states have guilines for what can be considered statutory rape. I live in PA and I'm pretty sure as long as your not 3 or more years older it's legal. And a 16 year old in PA CAN consent to sex. So it doesn't matter how old the other person is.
  20. Bananas
    TripDog's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  201 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    10,084
    Rep Power
    5552
    Level
    62
    Lv. Percent
    41.71%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Quote Originally Posted by SilentBob187 View Post
    x2.

    I am disappointed in the supreme court on this one.
    Ditto, raping kids is just seriously fukced up!!
    The LORD is my rock, my fortress, and my savior; my God is my rock, in whom I find protection. He is my shield, the power that saves me, and my place of safety.-Psalm 18:2
  21. Diamond Member
    Trauma1's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  220 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Age
    35
    Posts
    15,424
    Rep Power
    57341
    Level
    72
    Lv. Percent
    77.59%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Unfortunately i have to deal with situations like this in my job at times. Cops, Firemen, and medical personal often bear witness to the horrible aftermath of these types of crimes. I can say through my own personal experiences with situations like this over the years, it has certainly changed my own views on the right punishment to fit the crime.

    My stance is this. I don't care if it was an elderly person, middle age adult, teenager, or your child. The horror that these people endured will forever scar their memories and very existance.

    I fully support life in prison with the possibility of the death penalty being implemented if seen fit. I've always supported capital punishment, and i always will.

    Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
    Legendary

  22. Senior Member
    Nightwanderer's Avatar
    Stats
    5'6"   lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,307
    Rep Power
    735
    Level
    28
    Lv. Percent
    24.52%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    It's not my place to say wether people who have not affected my life in any way should live or die. I may consider supporting allowing the option of letting the victim or victim's guardian/immediate kin making the decision between life in a cage or cowardly death. Either would be unbearable to me.
  23. Senior Member
    b unit's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  242 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,646
    Rep Power
    1424
    Level
    37
    Lv. Percent
    67.62%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Trauma1 View Post

    I fully support life in prison with the possibility of the death penalty being implemented if seen fit. I've always supported capital punishment, and i always will.
    i long for the day the death penality gets brought back in my country.

    friggin low life scum keep killing and killing innocent people even after they out on parole after doing their first stretch in jail for murder.

    why should my hard earned $$$ paid in tax go to feeding and housing these S.O.B's when a simple injection would fix the situation.
  24. Binging on Pure ****ing Rage
    Mulletsoldier's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,226
    Rep Power
    27065
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    41.12%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    I disagree with the decision, if only due to 'crime's against the State' being deemed 'death penalty worthy' in lieu of child rape. The decision was predicated upon moral depravity, it seems, and such a malicious act is surely more morally reprehensible than a crime against a civil aggregate.

    If we consider the judicial system as a mechanism of social regulation, such that acts perceived to be disturbing to that particular community's* normative sense-of-self must be punished, then consider the following: an act of malicious violence toward a child is far more degradative, and contradictory to, the normative sense of a community than a single act of dissent - the dissent is merely more potentially damaging to the ossified superstructure of the collective, rather than the collective itself.

    If such an act is deemed punishable by death, so to should child rape.

    *community used in respects to any collection of individuals bonded by common moral, linguistic, normative, cultural, or geographic similarities.
  25. Bananas
    TripDog's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  201 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    10,084
    Rep Power
    5552
    Level
    62
    Lv. Percent
    41.71%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Quote Originally Posted by b unit View Post
    i long for the day the death penality gets brought back in my country.

    friggin low life scum keep killing and killing innocent people even after they out on parole after doing their first stretch in jail for murder.

    why should my hard earned $$$ paid in tax go to feeding and housing these S.O.B's when a simple injection would fix the situation.
    I vote for the firing squad personally..
    The LORD is my rock, my fortress, and my savior; my God is my rock, in whom I find protection. He is my shield, the power that saves me, and my place of safety.-Psalm 18:2
  26. Senior Member
    Nightwanderer's Avatar
    Stats
    5'6"   lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,307
    Rep Power
    735
    Level
    28
    Lv. Percent
    24.52%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by b unit View Post
    why should my hard earned $$$ paid in tax go to feeding and housing these S.O.B's when a simple injection would fix the situation.
    What I don't understand is why prisoners are allowed to live on death row for long after a death sentence. I believe there should be a timely limit, for the sake of all involved, and for the economy. Perhaps the federal gov't could appoint a person whose sole job is to familiarize himself with the cases
    and decide wether or not pardons/life sentences would be granted instead of letting people linger on for years draining our tax dollars, vainly hoping their state's governor is even familiar with the case, much less be willing to grant leniency at the last second.
  27. Senior Member
    slow-mun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,149
    Rep Power
    1175
    Level
    33
    Lv. Percent
    80.41%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Nightwanderer View Post
    What I don't understand is why prisoners are allowed to live on death row for long after a death sentence. I believe there should be a timely limit, for the sake of all involved, and for the economy. Perhaps the federal gov't could appoint a person whose sole job is to familiarize himself with the cases
    and decide wether or not pardons/life sentences would be granted instead of letting people linger on for years draining our tax dollars, vainly hoping their state's governor is even familiar with the case, much less be willing to grant leniency at the last second.
    They are allowed every chance of appeal and that takes an enormous amount of time.
  28. Registered User
    TheCrownedOne's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,362
    Rep Power
    804
    Level
    30
    Lv. Percent
    15.61%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by b unit View Post
    a child who's been violated suffers a life sentence so why should the offender, their innocence is mutilated and spirit destroyed.

    save tax $$$ and send them were they belong, six feet under
    Damn right. Kill 'em. They robbed the victim of their right to life; so too should their right be forfeited.
  29. NutraPlanet Fanatic
    dsade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    44
    Posts
    21,468
    Rep Power
    774675
    Level
    86
    Lv. Percent
    26.79%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCrownedOne View Post
    Damn right. Kill 'em. They robbed the victim of their right to life; so too should their right be forfeited.
    Jesus Loves You.
    Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
    BPS - Where Body meets Performance
    Flawless Skin Couture - We give you the tools to make you Flawless
  30. Advanced Member
    jcp2's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  255 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Age
    38
    Posts
    862
    Rep Power
    577
    Level
    23
    Lv. Percent
    16.06%

    I would have no problem with the death penalty in these cases, but i do see why the court ruled the way they did. People should be more concerned about the states like Vermont, that have such disgusting liberal judges. I would rather see articles about that.
  31. Registered User
    TheCrownedOne's Avatar
    Stats
    6'3"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,362
    Rep Power
    804
    Level
    30
    Lv. Percent
    15.61%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by dsade View Post
    Jesus Loves You.
    Right. I forgot God never advocated the death of his enemies
  32. Binging on Pure ****ing Rage
    Mulletsoldier's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,226
    Rep Power
    27065
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    41.12%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCrownedOne View Post
    Right. I forgot God never advocated the death of his enemies
    No, I see what you're getting at: when it suits a brotha, go all Old Testament g-o-d on someone's ass!

    When it comes to forgiveness, go all soft New Testament holy-trinity on some ****!

    I love the flexibility of christianity!

    Haha, I kid, I kid.
  33. Senior Member
    Red Dog's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,165
    Rep Power
    39388
    Level
    27
    Lv. Percent
    59.66%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    I don't know what exactly constitutes rape or if it is a case-by-case decision, but I would imagine "raping" a young MALE child (as long with some females) would frequently involve sodomy -- something that is almost incontestably malicious and brutal. You could even go as far as to say that it's a form of torture or deliberate/extenuating physical abuse -- which I certainly feel warrants the option to pursue the death penalty given the nature of such rapes.
  34. NutraPlanet Fanatic
    dsade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    44
    Posts
    21,468
    Rep Power
    774675
    Level
    86
    Lv. Percent
    26.79%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCrownedOne View Post
    Right. I forgot God never advocated the death of his enemies
    Funny, though...much like Slavery, there is zero age guidelines in the bible and MANY instances of child rape - many times on orders from god. In addition, women are already treated almost subumanely where permission is not required at all. Rape means you have to marry or pay a fine.

    Then again, you mask your contradiction (forgiveness and mercy) under the banner of understanding gods mind and proclaim them his enemes?
    Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
    BPS - Where Body meets Performance
    Flawless Skin Couture - We give you the tools to make you Flawless
  35. Senior Member
    futurepilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,217
    Rep Power
    1288
    Level
    35
    Lv. Percent
    54.44%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    The people of sumaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their god, they will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open.

    Hosea 13:16
  36. NutraPlanet Fanatic
    dsade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    44
    Posts
    21,468
    Rep Power
    774675
    Level
    86
    Lv. Percent
    26.79%
    Achievements Activity VeteranActivity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by futurepilot View Post
    The people of sumaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their god, they will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open.

    Hosea 13:16
    Those sinful, rebellious fetuses got what they deserved.
    Evolutionary Muse - Inspire to Evolve
    BPS - Where Body meets Performance
    Flawless Skin Couture - We give you the tools to make you Flawless
  37. Senior Member
    bigpapa's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  220 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,955
    Rep Power
    1572
    Level
    38
    Lv. Percent
    75.46%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    it costs more money to keep someone in prison and death row than to kill them. for what like $.50 u can put a bullet in someones head but it costs like somwhere like $25,000 a year to keep someone in prison? people who rape children deserve to die...and i think the parents should have the option to do it themselves without any repurcussion...my 2 cents...cause i know when i have children and if that happens...that SOB is dead even before the cops get to them
  38. Senior Member
    b unit's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  242 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,646
    Rep Power
    1424
    Level
    37
    Lv. Percent
    67.62%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    charles bronson had the right idea in the death wise movies

    zero tolerance

  39. Banned
    FcuktheFDA's Avatar
    Stats
    5'6"  218 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    127
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    9
    Lv. Percent
    98.84%

    I'm against the death penalty, but not in this case. I think child molestors and rapists are absolute scum. They should be put to death.

    I remember seeing debates about this on MSNBC the other night. I do agree with the boundaries that some states have set, such as New York. If the girl is 16 years of age, then the man can be no more than 4 years older than her. Something like that. But there is a big difference between a girl being 16 and a girl being 12 or under.

    I'm disappointed in the Supreme Court as well.
  40. Senior Member
    b unit's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  242 lbs.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,646
    Rep Power
    1424
    Level
    37
    Lv. Percent
    67.62%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    i think that anyone who rapes a child should have a red hot poker rammed up their rectum so they can feel the pain that they are infecting on innocent kids!

    then they can have their dicks cut off, the eyes gouged out, ear drums perferated and their tongues cut off, then they can feel no evil, see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil.

    sorted
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 132
    Last Post: 08-16-2010, 03:47 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-28-2010, 11:47 AM
  3. Afgan Christian Faces Death Penalty:
    By motiv8er in forum News and Articles
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 03-28-2006, 11:42 PM
  4. Supreme Court Bars commandments from courthouses.
    By Funny Monkey in forum Politics
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 08-19-2005, 10:20 AM
  5. Bushes new supreme court justice
    By UNDERTAKER in forum Politics
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 08-05-2005, 06:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in