I believe you should conduct yourself the same way on the internet as you do in real life. I'm mean just because nobody can see you doesn't mean your morals change.
On a serious note, what she did was pretty maniacal. It was pre-meditated emotional destruction of a teenage girl. Don't give that crap, that you didn't know it would effect her to such a large degree. You planned to emotionally damage the girl, and the girl was emotionally damaged to such a large degree that she took her own life. You should rot in a jail cell for the rest of your life.
I believe you should conduct yourself the same way on the internet as you do in real life. I'm mean just because nobody can see you doesn't mean your morals change.
I would agree crader and it's a shame that a lot of people use the internet as an outlet for inappropriate behavior that they wouldn't get away with in the real world.
I believe you should conduct yourself the same way on the internet as you do in real life. I'm mean just because nobody can see you doesn't mean your morals change.
moooo moooooror mooooor-aaaalss?
What are these mooor-aaalls you speak of, Hew-man?
What should happen and what will happen are two totally different things. A precedent may be set with her conviction of some sort but unless they can invent a law that pertains to the exact thing she did, I don't think she will get much time and a lot of it will be community service.
Yea, I think the only thing she is being charged with right now is Terms of Service violation... don't really see how they can do that in court, but I hope they get her with something.
Because an emotionally unstable girl killed herself?
So then, lets say that this was in fact a real boy that dumped her, she kills her self, should he be tried for something?
Give me a break.
Yes, violating the ToS, sure, its a stretch, but that would be as far as it should go.
I think we would say that the dealings of two individuals of the same age, most likely dealing with spontaneous emotions, is different than purposeful and deliberate malice. I agree with you, insofar as the penalty to assign is a difficult thing; that being said, I think your analogy may not fit the scenario! That is merely my opinion, though.
I think we would say that the dealings of two individuals of the same age, most likely dealing with spontaneous emotions, is different than purposeful and deliberate malice. I agree with you, insofar as the penalty to assign is a difficult thing; that being said, I think your analogy may not fit the scenario! That is merely my opinion, though.
Ok, hypothetically speaking, a 16yo girl and a 20+yo 'adult' male. Yes, it happens...
He is a loser that likes to go out with young girls, he strings her along, promises the world, f*cks her, then he dumps said girl, malicious or not, she kills her self.
Crime?
Don't get me wrong, I think the woman is a god damned lunatic and should really get a life, but if 'e-fighting' was enough to make people kill themselves, than THEY have deeper issues than what is really on the surface.
So it would be ok for me to torment your kid? Until he/she killed themself? And you'd have no problem with it??? Yea right.
I would kill her kids if she had any, if not, I'd kill something she cares about...then kill her, but that's me.
Should there be a law against bullying? no....the current laws for stalking are adequate IMO, people are going to bullied, threatened and placed in bad situations when they grow up.
If a child grows up in a sterile environment without bullying they have no immunity to it later on, just like if a kid grew up in sterile environment without germs and they have no immunity against them.......
Gotta break some eggs to make an omelet..........jk
Ok, hypothetically speaking, a 16yo girl and a 20+yo 'adult' male. Yes, it happens...
He is a loser that likes to go out with young girls, he strings her along, promises the world, f*cks her, then he dumps said girl, malicious or not, she kills her self.
Crime?
Don't get me wrong, I think the woman is a god damned lunatic and should really get a life, but if 'e-fighting' was enough to make people kill themselves, than THEY have deeper issues than what is really on the surface.
In that case I would not say it is a crime; however, I think there exists a difference between spontaneous emotion (in that scenario you posited), and 'malice intent'. I feel the issue here is that there was a deliberate and purposeful chain of events being perpetuated by an adult onto a child, for the specific intent of doing harm. In my humble opinion, I feel this particular scenario separates itself along those parameters from other suicide cases.
Yea, I'm actually surprised that I'm on the side of prosecuting this piece of $hit woman. The kid probably should have been more mentally stable. But she wasn't. I was tormented as a kid, and I didn't kill myself, but it was "age appropriate" tormenting if that makes sense.
Anyway, maybe this biatch will get the big karmic phucking that she deserves. I sure hope she does.
In that case I would not say it is a crime; however, I think there exists a difference between spontaneous emotion (in that scenario you posited), and 'malice intent'. I feel the issue here is that there was a deliberate and purposeful chain of events being perpetuated by an adult onto a child, for the specific intent of doing harm. In my humble opinion, I feel this particular scenario separates itself along those parameters from other suicide cases.
Ever been stalked by a psycho girlfriend? I just change emails/filter them, block on IM, and screen phone calls.
You are not safe from prosecution, Even on the internet!! 
....jk
