Was your lipid panel terrible to begin with?
At 200 mg/wk, I doubt you'd have a significantly altered cholesterol panel. There have been admittedly short studies, but doses up to 600mg/wk weren't producing significantly terrible outcomes on lipid panels in otherwise healthy individuals without additional hormones/supplements confounding the blood-work.
Additionally, there is a leap of faith in assuming that any changes that come from hCG that are reflected in your lipid panel are technically doing anything other than artificial improvements. We've known for quite some time, for example, that while Niacin can improve HDL profiles it doesn't do anything that we have been able to identify in terms of actually improving outcomes.
While I understand the desire to pre-empt any potential problems, the alternative to this is that every pharmacologic addition is more potential cascades of problems.
Again, in my own case as both a professional and someone who has central (secondary) hypgonadism on TRT, I take a very minimalist approach. But, ultimately the decision is made between you and your care provider.