Well you know read here and there how low BF% results in less stealing of free Test or bioavailable T by estrogen, cortisol, shbg,etc.etc.
What is the ideal bf% or range so when is truly maximizing natural production?
I see 1-5% is essential fat and then there is that 6-13% range for athletes and 14-17% for fitness. The latter numbers seems high as in much fat.
Based on images of similar frame males I am about 12-13%. I think my low was 11% earlier last year. Is there a measurable T-difference between 1% BF?
I was in the Dr. the other day and notice that Novo Nordisk 5lbs of simulated fat and wonder if trimming down 5lbs would make a difference in natural T-levels. I went back to eating bread(Dave's Killer Bread) and notice the abs are not as deeply defined as they used to be.
What is the ideal bf% or range so when is truly maximizing natural production?
I see 1-5% is essential fat and then there is that 6-13% range for athletes and 14-17% for fitness. The latter numbers seems high as in much fat.
Based on images of similar frame males I am about 12-13%. I think my low was 11% earlier last year. Is there a measurable T-difference between 1% BF?
I was in the Dr. the other day and notice that Novo Nordisk 5lbs of simulated fat and wonder if trimming down 5lbs would make a difference in natural T-levels. I went back to eating bread(Dave's Killer Bread) and notice the abs are not as deeply defined as they used to be.