old T911 vs new T911

  1. Registered User
    protempsfish's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  187 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    162
    Answers
    0

    Angry old T911 vs new T911


    So what is the difference between the new version (Testosterone Support Complex:Cyclodextrin , Luteolin , Androstan-3-alpha-ol-17-one , Ellagic Acid (Proprietary Standardized Extract), Resveratrol (Proprietary Standardized Extract) , Yohimbine) vs the old one with the SERM. I placed an order elsewhere as NP did not have this in stock (and still doesnt) and I recieved the old version. Is the new one better/stronger faster like Steve Austin? Joking aside this is frustrating because one would assume if you changed the formula it would be to make the product better.

  2. Registered User
    gymdevil25's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  245 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    82
    Answers
    0


    Read this thread and should answer your question...T-911
  3. Registered User
    protempsfish's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  187 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    162
    Answers
    0


    Thanks for the link. By what I read I guess there isnt a huge difference between the two formulas. Still sucks as I bought this assuming it was the new version.
    •   
       

  4. Registered User
    gymdevil25's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  245 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    82
    Answers
    0


    I liked the old version better. I have tried both and found I had a greater reduction in body fat and had more aggression on the old version. Give it shot I don't think you will be disappointed.
  5. Registered User
    protempsfish's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  187 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    162
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by gymdevil25 View Post
    I liked the old version better. I have tried both and found I had a greater reduction in body fat and had more aggression on the old version. Give it shot I don't think you will be disappointed.
    Glad to hear! This is my second bottle. My first time trying this was excellent and I had good results.
  6. Registered User
    pushinweightw's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  224 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    416
    Answers
    0


    Quote Originally Posted by protempsfish View Post
    Glad to hear! This is my second bottle. My first time trying this was excellent and I had good results.
    Some like the OG better than the new one. I have only tried the nre version with great success. You will good to go with either IMO.


  7. Registered User
    Flyboy's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  184lbs lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    442
    Answers
    0


    i definitely preferred the original - the newer formula doesn't seem to do much for me, the old one was brilliant.
  8. Registered User
    luclyluciano's Avatar
    Stats
    6'0"  197 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,495
    Answers
    0


    New one did nothing, even at 7 per day. Placebo IMO.
  9. Registered User
    protempsfish's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  187 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    162
    Answers
    0


    Not sure why companies change things that already work well.
  10. Registered User
    CleetusVanDam's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  250 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    464
    Answers
    0


    loved the old formula been solid 4 on 4 off for a year!! The new ones IMO are just ****ty tasting sweet tarts!
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Plz help t911!!!
    By eli123 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 11:17 PM
  2. T911
    By imenraged in forum Supplements
    Replies: 110
    Last Post: 06-27-2009, 07:07 AM
  3. T911 and GNC?
    By TexasTitan in forum LG Sciences
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-20-2009, 11:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in