I think it provided a pulse. I have read it before. As far as I recall mk677 should be taken in the morning rather than in the night. Since We get a gh pulse whilst during the deep sleep and by taking it in the morning you get 2 big pulses in 24 hours
Do you have a link?
I found this on another forum.
Quote Originally Posted by conwict View Post
chops, by definition a long elevation (such as mk677 - as opposed to say rHGH @ 9-12 hrs) is a "bleed." But the reason this is undesirable is not just desensitization; the acute efficacy is reduced, too.
I seem to have conflated two issues here, and I am sorry for the confusion.
I understand the difference between desensitization and bleed.
My understanding is that the term GH bleed is used to describe a state where the pituitary does not completely stop secreting GH between pulses and thus, "bleeds" GH; that is, the plasma troughs- in a graph- between GH pulses do not return to near zero.
My point regarding MK-677 and GH bleed is that I have not found any study that mentions this as a consequence of MK-677 administration. As well, the study that Dat cited in his 2008 post on AnabolicMinds includes this figure:
Panel C: Representative 24-h GH profiles in one 70-year-old man, treated for one year with MK-677. 24-h mean GH levels (open circles), 6 months (triangles) and 12 months (closed circles), respectively. Note that the pulsatile pattern of GH secretion at baseline is maintained and enhanced at 6 and 12 months, primarily as a result of increased secretion per peak rather than peak frequency.
The above figure shows that there is no bleed in this subject after 1 year- except possibly during sleep, which is normal.
The study is of particular value because the cohort is large (65 men and women) and healthy. Plus it is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, modified-crossover clinical trial.
So this raises the question in my mind: Is there any study showing GH bleed after long term MK-677 administration?
The second point I was trying to make is that as far as I can discern, the only serious objection Dat has made to the use of MK-677 is that it causes desensitization. He makes this objection in this thread on Growth Hormone Secretagogues posted by him on 8th August 2009:
In his post, Dat states:
"Based on the effectiveness of GHRPs smaller non-peptide molecules were created in an effort to mimic the GH releasing effects of GHRPs with the desire to develop a compound with high oral bioavailability. As a result MK-0677 was eventually created as a non-peptide compound with sustained GH release and higher oral bioavailability. Unfortunately desensitization was found to occur fairly rapidly (my emphasis)."
This was posted nine months after he posted on AnabolicMinds his discussion of the "Effects of an Oral Ghrelin Mimetic (MK-677) on Body Composition and Clinical Outcomes in Healthy Older Adults" study
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2757071/
in which he observed:
"It took six months to build up but in the end GH & IGF-1 were elevated and remained so for the remainder of the year of continued use..." "There was no demonstrated desensitization in this study."
And so I'm wondering if there was any new information to change his thinking on MK-677 desensitization? (which I understand is a seprate issue from bleed)