Dinosaurs were created 6000 years ago? answers in genesis

Status
Not open for further replies.
jomi822

jomi822

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
I will try my damndest not to make one comment on this thread. the article speaks for itself in my mind.....it throws all science out the window.

by Ken Ham

An aura of mystery surrounds the dinosaurs. Where did they come from? Did they evolve? Did they really live millions of years ago? What happened to them? Are there any living today? Has any human being ever seen a live dinosaur?

Children and adults alike are absolutely fascinated by these mysterious monsters. Numerous books and movies have been produced to satisfy a seemingly insatiable hunger for information on these puzzling creatures. The truth of the matter, however, is that there are no real mysteries at all, once you have key information that is not generally known and is withheld from the public.

Come with me as we take a walk through history and uncover some amazing facts that will answer many of your questions about these ‘terrible lizards.’
Did Dinosaurs Really Exist?

Dinosaurs certainly did roam the Earth in the ancient past! Fossils of dinosaurs have been found all over the world, and their bones are displayed in museums for all to see. Scientists have been able to reconstruct many of their skeletons, so we know much about how they may have looked.
When Were Dinosaurs Found?

The story of their discovery began back in the 1820s, when Gideon Mantell, an English doctor, found some unusual teeth and bones in a quarry. Dr Mantell realized there was something very different about these animal remains, and believed that he had found an entirely new group of reptiles. By 1841, about nine types of these different reptiles had been uncovered, including two called Megalosaurus and Iguanodon.

At this time, a famous British scientist (and creationist), Dr Richard Owen, coined the name ‘Dinosauria,’ meaning ‘terrible lizard,’ for this is what the huge bones made him think of.
What Makes Dinosaurs Different?

Other than the huge size of some dinosaurs, the major feature that really distinguishes dinosaurs from other reptiles (such as crocodiles) is the position of their limbs. Dinosaurs had posture that was fully erect, similar to that in mammals. Most other reptiles have limbs in a sprawling position. For instance, compare the way a crocodile ‘walks’ with that of, say, a cow. Dinosaurs would have moved like a cow, with the limbs supporting the body from beneath. Crocodiles ‘waddle,’ as their limbs project sideways from their body.
How Big Were Dinosaurs?

Some were as small as chickens, and others were even smaller. Of course, some dinosaurs were very large, weighing in at an estimated 80 tons and standing 40 feet high! The average size of a dinosaur, however, was probably about that of a small horse.
When Did Dinosaurs Live?

The story we have all heard from movies, television, newspapers, and most magazines and textbooks is that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. According to evolutionists, the dinosaurs ‘ruled the Earth’ for 140 million years, dying out about 65 million years ago. However, scientists do not dig up anything labeled with those ages. They only uncover dead dinosaurs (i.e., their bones), and their bones do not have labels attached telling how old they are. The idea of millions of years of evolution is just the evolutionists’ story about the past. No scientist was there to see the dinosaurs live through this supposed dinosaur age. In fact, there is no proof whatsoever that the world and its fossil layers are millions of years old. No scientist observed dinosaurs die. Scientists only find the bones in the here and now, and because many of them are evolutionists, they try to fit the story of the dinosaurs into their view.

Other scientists, called creation scientists, have a different idea about when dinosaurs lived. They believe they can solve any of the supposed dinosaur mysteries and show how the evidence fits wonderfully with their ideas about the past, beliefs that come from the Bible.

The Bible, God’s very special book (or collection of books, really), claims that each writer was supernaturally inspired to write exactly what the Creator of all things wanted him to write down for us so that we can know where we (and dinosaurs) came from, why we are here, and what our future will be. The first book in the Bible—Genesis—teaches us many things about how the universe and life came into existence. Genesis tells us that God created everything—the Earth, stars, sun, moon, plants, animals, and the first two people.

Although the Bible does not tell us exactly how long ago it was that God made the world and its creatures, we can make a good estimate of the date of creation by reading through the Bible and noting some interesting passages:

1.

God made everything in six days. He did this, by the way, to set a pattern for mankind, which has become our seven day week (as described in Exodus 20:11). God worked for six days and rested for one, as a model for us. Furthermore, Bible scholars will tell you that the Hebrew word for day used in Genesis 1, can only mean an ordinary day in this context.
2.

We are told God created the first man and woman—Adam and Eve—on Day Six. Many facts about when their children and their children’s children were born are given in Genesis. These genealogies are recorded throughout the Old Testament, up until the time of Christ. They certainly were not chronologies lasting millions of years.

As you add up all of the dates, and accepting that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, came to Earth almost 2000 years ago, we come to the conclusion that the creation of the Earth and animals (including the dinosaurs) occurred only thousands of years ago (perhaps only 6000!), not millions of years. Thus, if the Bible is right (and it is!), dinosaurs must have lived within the past thousands of years.
Where Did Dinosaurs Come From?

Evolutionists claim that dinosaurs evolved over millions of years. They imagine that one kind of animal slowly changed over long periods of time to become a different kind of animal. For instance, they believe that amphibians changed into reptiles (including dinosaurs) by this gradual process. This would mean, of course, that there would have been millions of creatures during that time that would be ‘in between,’ as amphibians evolved into reptiles. Evidence of these ‘transitional forms,’ as they are called, should be abundant. However, many fossil experts admit that not one unquestionable transitional form between any group of creatures and another has been found anywhere. If dinosaurs evolved from amphibians, there should be, for example, fossil evidence of animals that are part dinosaur and part something else. However, there is no proof of this anywhere. In fact, if you go into any museum you will see fossils of dinosaurs that are 100% dinosaur, not something in between. There are no 25%, 50%, 75%, or even 99% dinosaurs—they are all 100% dinosaur!

The Bible tells us that God created all of the land animals on the sixth day of creation. As dinosaurs were land animals, they must have been made on this day, alongside Adam and Eve, who were also created on Day Six (Genesis 1:24-31). If God designed and created dinosaurs, they would have been fully functional, designed to do what they were created for, and would have been 100% dinosaur. This fits exactly with the evidence from the fossil record.

Evolutionists declare that no man ever lived alongside dinosaurs. The Bible, however, makes it plain that dinosaurs and people must have lived together. Actually, as we will soon see, there is a lot of evidence for this.
What Did Dinosaurs Eat?

The Bible teaches (in Genesis 1:29-30) that the original animals (and the first humans) were commanded to be vegetarian. There were no meat eaters in the original creation. Furthermore, there was no death. It was an unblemished world, with Adam and Eve and animals (including dinosaurs) living in perfect harmony, eating only plants.

Sadly, it did not stay this way for very long. Adam rebelled against his Creator, bringing sin into the world (Genesis 3:1-7; Romans 5:12). Because of this rebellion, Adam, and thus all of his descendants (you and me), gave up the right to live with a Holy (sinless) and just God. God therefore judged sin with death.

The Bible plainly teaches from Genesis to Revelation that there was no death of animals or humans before Adam sinned. (Consider just a few of the many passages, such as: Romans 5:12; Genesis 2:17; Genesis 1:29-30; Romans 8:20-22; Acts 3:21; Hebrews 9:22; I Corinthians 15; Revelation 21:1-4; Revelation 22:3.) This means there could not have been any animal fossils (and no dinosaur bones) before sin.

After Adam’s sin, animals and people started to die. It was now a different world, one of death and strife. A world that was once beautiful now suffered under the curse placed upon it by the Creator (Genesis 3:14-19). But a promise was given (Genesis 3:15) that God would provide a way for the penalty of sin to be paid so there would be a way for man to come back to God.
Why Do We Find Dinosaur Fossils?

In Genesis 6, we read that all flesh (man and animals) had ‘corrupted his way upon the Earth’ (Genesis 6:12). Perhaps people and animals were killing each other; maybe dinosaurs had started killing other animals and humans. In any case, the Bible describes the world as ‘wicked.’

Because of this wickedness, God warned a godly man named Noah that He was going to destroy the world with a Flood (Genesis 6:13). God therefore commanded him to build a great ship (the Ark) so that all the kinds of land animals (which must have included dinosaurs) and Noah’s family could survive on board while the Flood destroyed the entire Earth (Genesis 6:14-20).

Some people think that dinosaurs were too big, or there were too many of them, to go on this Ark. However, there were not very many different kinds of dinosaurs. There are certainly hundreds of dinosaur names, but many of these were given to just a bit of bone or skeletons of the same dinosaur found in other countries. It is also reasonable to assume that different sizes, varieties, and sexes of the same kind of dinosaur have ended up with different names. For example, look at the many different varieties and sizes of dogs, but they are all the same kind-the dog kind! In reality, there may have been fewer than 50 kinds of dinosaurs.

God sent two of every (seven of some) land animal into the Ark (Genesis 7:2-3; 7:8-9)—there were no exceptions. Therefore, dinosaurs must have been on the Ark. Even though there was ample room in the huge ship for large animals, perhaps God sent young adults into the Ark that still had plenty of room for them to grow.

Well, what happened to all the land animals that did not go on the Ark? Very simply, they drowned. Many would have been covered with tons of mud as the rampaging water covered the land (Genesis 7:11-12,19). Because of this quick burial, many of the animals would have been preserved as fossils. If this happened, you would expect to find evidence of billions of dead things buried in rock layers (formed from this mud) all over the Earth. This is exactly what you do find.

By the way, the Flood of Noah’s day probably occurred just over 4,500 years ago. Creationists believe that this event formed many of the fossil layers around the Earth. (Additional fossil layers were formed by other floods as the Earth settled down after the great Flood.) Thus, the dinosaur fossils which were formed as a result of this Flood were probably formed about 4,500 years ago, not millions of years ago.
Have Dinosaurs Lived in Recent Times?

If the different kinds of dinosaurs survived the Flood, then they must have come off the Ark and lived in the post-Flood world.

In the Bible, in Job 40:15-24, God describes to Job (who lived after the Flood) a great beast with which Job was familiar. This great animal, called ‘behemoth,’ is described as ‘the chief of the ways of God,’ perhaps the biggest land animal God had created. Impressively, he moved his tail like a cedar tree! Although some Bible commentaries say this may have been an elephant or hippopotamus, the description actually fits that of a dinosaur like Brachiosaurus. Elephants and hippos certainly do not have tails like cedar trees!

Actually, very few animals are singled out in the Bible for such a detailed description. Contrary to what many may think, what we know now as dinosaurs get more mention in the Scriptures than most animals! So dinosaurs—all the different kinds—must have lived alongside of people after the Flood.
Are Dinosaurs Mentioned in Ancient Literature?

Interestingly, the word ‘dragon’ is used a number of times in the Old Testament. In most instances, the word dinosaur could substitute for dragon and it would fit very nicely. Creation scientists believe that dinosaurs were called dragons before the word dinosaur was invented in the 1800s. We would not expect to find the word dinosaur in Bibles like the Authorized Version (1611), as it was translated well before the word dinosaur was ever used.

Also, there are many very old history books in various libraries around the world that have detailed records of dragons and their encounters with people. Surprisingly (or not so surprisingly for creationists), many of these descriptions of dragons fit with how modern scientists would describe dinosaurs, even Tyrannosaurus. Unfortunately, this evidence is not considered valid by evolutionists. Why? Only because their belief is that man and dinosaurs did not live at the same time!

However, the more we research the historical literature, the more we realize there is overwhelming evidence that dragons were real beasts, much like our modern reconstructions of dinosaurs, and that their existence has been recorded by many different people, even just hundreds of years ago.
What Happened to Dinosaurs?

Evolutionists use their imagination in a big way in answering this question. Because of their belief that dinosaurs ‘ruled’ the world for millions of years, and then disappeared millions of years before man allegedly evolved, they have had to come up with all sorts of guesses to explain this ‘mysterious’ disappearance.

When reading evolutionist literature, you will be astonished at the range of ideas concerning their supposed extinction. The following is just a small list of theories:

Dinosaurs starved to death; they died from overeating; they were poisoned; they became blind from cataracts and could not reproduce; mammals ate their eggs. Other causes include-volcanic dust, poisonous gases, comets, sunspots, meteorites, mass suicide, constipation, parasites, shrinking brain (and greater stupidity), slipped discs, changes in the composition of air, etc.

It is obvious that evolutionists don’t know what happened and are grasping at straws. In a recent evolutionary book on dinosaurs, ‘A New Look At the Dinosaurs,’ the author made the statement:

‘Now comes the important question. What caused all these extinctions at one particular point in time, approximately 65 million years ago? Dozens of reasons have been suggested, some serious and sensible, others quite crazy, and yet others merely as a joke. Every year people come up with new theories on this thorny problem. The trouble is that if we are to find just one reason to account for them all, it would have to explain the death, all at the same time, of animals living on land and of animals living in the sea; but, in both cases, of only some of those animals, for many of the land dwellers and many of the sea-dwellers went on living quite happily into the following period. Alas, no such one explanation exists’ (Alan Charig, p. 150).

But, one such explanation does exist. If you remove the evolutionary framework, get rid of the millions of years, and then take the Bible seriously, you will find an explanation that fits the facts and makes perfect sense:

At the time of the Flood, many of the sea creatures died, but some survived. In addition, all of the land creatures outside the Ark died, but the representatives of all the kinds that survived on the Ark lived in the new world after the Flood. Those land animals (including dinosaurs) found the new world to be much different than the one before the Flood. Due to (1) competition for food that was no longer in abundance, (2) other catastrophes, (3) man killing for food (and perhaps for fun), and (4) the destruction of habitats, etc., many species of animals eventually died out. The group of animals we now call dinosaurs just happened to die out too. In fact, quite a number of animals ....
 
Last edited:
Jayhawkk

Jayhawkk

Legend
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
I believe in God but this article does very little of throwing science out the window. It actually does very poorly at explaining anythng,
 
jomi822

jomi822

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
(2) other catastrophes, (3) man killing for food (and perhaps for fun), and (4) the destruction of habitats, etc., many species of animals eventually died out. The group of animals we now call dinosaurs just happened to die out too. In fact, quite a number of animals become extinct each year. Extinction seems to be the rule in Earth history (not the formation of new types of animals as you would expect from evolution).
Will We Ever See a Live Dinosaur?

The answer is probably not … but, then again? There are some scientists who believe a few dinosaurs may have survived in remote jungles. We are still discovering new species of animals and plants today in areas that have been too difficult to explore until now. Even natives in some countries describe beasts that fit with what might be a dinosaur.

Creationists, of course, would not be surprised if someone found a living dinosaur. However, evolutionists would then have to explain why they made dogmatic statements that man and dinosaur never lived at the same time. I suspect they would say something to the effect that this dinosaur somehow survived because it was trapped in a remote area that has not changed for millions of years. You see, no matter what is found, or how embarrassing it is to evolutionists’ ideas, they will always be able to concoct an ‘answer’ because evolution is a belief. It is not science—it is not fact!
What Lessons Can We Learn From the Dinosaur?

When we see the bones of dinosaurs, we can be reminded that death was not a part of the original creation. Death is actually an intruder, entering when the first man disobeyed God. The Bible tells us that because we are all descendants of Adam, we too have sinned: ‘Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned’ (Romans 5:12); ‘For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God’ (Romans 3:23). We need to recognize that the wickedness in the world is because of sin, because man rebelled against God.

We can also be reminded that God, who made all things, including the dinosaurs, is also a judge of His creation. He judged Adam’s rebellion by cursing the world with death. Adam was warned about what would happen if he disobeyed God’s instruction not to eat the fruit of one particular tree. ‘But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die’ (Genesis 2:17).

Dinosaurs can also remind us that God judged the rebellion in Noah’s day by destroying the wicked world with water, resulting in the death of millions of creatures. The Bible teaches us that He will again judge the world, but next time by fire: ‘But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the Earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up’ (2 Peter 3:10).

We can also be reminded that after this judgment by fire, God will make a new heaven and Earth: ‘Nevertheless we, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new Earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness’ (2 Peter 3:13). And what will it be like in this new Earth? ‘And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away’ (Revelation 21:4).

But we are also warned that many will not be allowed into this new Earth but will suffer for eternity: ‘But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death’ (Revelation 21:8).

Humans, who are all sinful from conception (Psalm 51:5), cannot live with a Holy God, but are condemned to separation from God. But, God provided a wonderful means of deliverance from sin. The Bible teaches that God offered the perfect sacrifice needed to pay the penalty for man’s sin. God’s own Son, the one who in fact created the world (Colossians 1:16), came to Earth as a man, as a descendant of Adam, to suffer the death penalty for sin. ‘But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive’ (I Corinthians 15:20-22).

The Lord Jesus Christ died on a cross, but on the third day, rose again, conquering death, so that anyone who believes in Him and accepts Him into his or her life, is able to come back to God and live for eternity with the Creator. ‘For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life’ (John 3:16); ‘If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness’ (I John 1:9).

For those who do not accept by faith what Christ has done for them and do not recognize their sinful nature and need for redemption, the Bible warns that such people will live forever, but will be separated from God in a place of torment that the Bible calls Hell. But for those who commit their lives to the Lord—what a wonderful message! What a wonderful Savior! What a wonderful salvation in Christ the Creator!

If you, the reader of this web page, want to know more about how you can spend eternity with the God of creation, please click here.
 
Chemist2234

Chemist2234

Member
Awards
0
Science out the Window??? you must be kidding.... all the article does is called evolutionists dumb... and makes no relevant remarks to current scientific methods used to investigate fossils.
 
Chemist2234

Chemist2234

Member
Awards
0
Personally, I'm getting kind of sick of these threads on AM. Its the same argument every time. The same things get said, and nothing comes of it. As far as I'm concerned i think you should take your modern day crusade someplace else and keep AM a place where we can talk and learn about sports nutrition and technique. I'm out.
 
BUCKNUTS

BUCKNUTS

Board Supporter
Awards
1
  • Established
Personally, I'm getting kind of sick of these threads on AM. Its the same argument every time. The same things get said, and nothing comes of it. As far as I'm concerned i think you should take your modern day crusade someplace else and keep AM a place where we can talk and learn about sports nutrition and technique. I'm out.
:clap2: Very well said we just did this a week ago and this thread will only produce the same endless argument.
 
Jayhawkk

Jayhawkk

Legend
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
These threads are by far a small % of the total threads and it is in general chat which allows people to bring other things here without cluttering up the training/nutrition/supplement areas. Just as easy as you replied you could of ignored the thread or the thread starter.

That article is pretty much trash as far as I am concerned but it's just an opinion just like ours.
 

Nullifidian

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
Science out the Window??? you must be kidding.... all the article does is called evolutionists dumb... and makes no relevant remarks to current scientific methods used to investigate fossils.

The term "throwing X out the window" means compeltely disregarding "X". So "throwing science out the window" means compeltely disregarding science; i.e. ignoring science completely.
 
Jayhawkk

Jayhawkk

Legend
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
Hmm, I misread that as well then. I took the phrase as meaning it threw it out the window because it was useless info.
 
B5150

B5150

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Because of this wickedness, God warned a godly man named Noah that He was going to destroy the world with a Flood (Genesis 6:13). God therefore commanded him to build a great ship (the Ark) so that all the kinds of land animals (which must have included dinosaurs) and Noah’s family could survive on board while the Flood destroyed the entire Earth (Genesis 6:14-20).

Some people think that dinosaurs were too big, or there were too many of them, to go on this Ark. However, there were not very many different kinds of dinosaurs. There are certainly hundreds of dinosaur names, but many of these were given to just a bit of bone or skeletons of the same dinosaur found in other countries. It is also reasonable to assume that different sizes, varieties, and sexes of the same kind of dinosaur have ended up with different names. For example, look at the many different varieties and sizes of dogs, but they are all the same kind-the dog kind! In reality, there may have been fewer than 50 kinds of dinosaurs.

God sent two of every (seven of some) land animal into the Ark (Genesis 7:2-3; 7:8-9)—there were no exceptions. Therefore, dinosaurs must have been on the Ark. Even though there was ample room in the huge ship for large animals, perhaps God sent young adults into the Ark that still had plenty of room for them to grow.

Well, what happened to all the land animals that did not go on the Ark? Very simply, they drowned. Many would have been covered with tons of mud as the rampaging water covered the land (Genesis 7:11-12,19). Because of this quick burial, many of the animals would have been preserved as fossils. If this happened, you would expect to find evidence of billions of dead things buried in rock layers (formed from this mud) all over the Earth. This is exactly what you do find.

By the way, the Flood of Noah’s day probably occurred just over 4,500 years ago. Creationists believe that this event formed many of the fossil layers around the Earth. (Additional fossil layers were formed by other floods as the Earth settled down after the great Flood.) Thus, the dinosaur fossils which were formed as a result of this Flood were probably formed about 4,500 years ago, not millions of years ago.
Have Dinosaurs Lived in Recent Times?

If the different kinds of dinosaurs survived the Flood, then they must have come off the Ark and lived in the post-Flood world.
They have a documentary being released on this very soon. ;)

http://www.evanalmighty.com/
 

Nullifidian

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
Hmm, I misread that as well then. I took the phrase as meaning it threw it out the window because it was useless info.
No no, throwing it out the window means to CONSIDER something to be useless and thus disregarding it entirely. It's typically used as a phrase to give a negative connotation to the person doing the throwing, not the throwee.
 
B5150

B5150

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
OK then, so what about "don't throw the baby out with the bath water"? ;)
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
They only uncover dead dinosaurs (i.e., their bones), and their bones do not have labels attached telling how old they are.
Carbon dating? *edit: okay, bad example, as carbon cannot be used for this far back in history. But, the point still stands.


The Bible, God’s very special book
*cringe*

Dog-eared as propaganda already.


we can make a good estimate of the date of creation by reading through the Bible
According to the author, scientists weren't around to actually see dinosaurs. But, somehow they were were around to see the Bible written as truth. Strange hypocrisy.


As you add up all of the dates, and accepting that Jesus Christ, the Son of God
*cringe*

More propaganda.

---------------

Okay, I had to stop there. After reading on (and puking in my mouth a few times along the way), I've decided that this is not a fitting argument for people of a sound mind. *edited for tact




:wtf:
 
B5150

B5150

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Okay, I had to stop there. After reading on (and puking in my mouth a few times along the way), I've decided that this is PERFECT for ignorant, mentally-challenged people, who might be easily swayed by other ignorant, mentally-challenged people.




:wtf:
Please dude?!?! This is the sort of stuff that is antagonistic and condescending to people with different views. Why is it so damn difficult for you people to disagree without insulting. WHY?

You make intelligent statements that have some sound reason and logic to them and then you demonstrate your own damn ignorance. Disagree RESPECTFULLY!
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Please dude?!?! This is the sort of stuff that is antagonistic and condescending to people with different views. Why is it some damn difficult for you people to disagree without insulting. WHY?

You make intelligent statements that have some sound reason and logic to them and then you demonstrate your own damn ignorance. Disagree RESPECTFULLY!
In no way shape or form did I talk down to anyone. This article is bullsh*t, whether you believe in God or not. So, don't take my remarks as anti-christian, rather anti-stupidity.

I've seen MUCH better arguments wrt events and/or history in relation to what the Bible says. This article has no sound basis.

So, sorry for being a bit crass in my remarks. But, seriously, even Christians shouldn't fall for this perverted twist of historical data.
 
B5150

B5150

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
In no way shape or form did I talk down to anyone.
You are kidding, right?
This is PERFECT for ignorant, mentally-challenged people, who might be easily swayed by other ignorant, mentally-challenged people.
This article is bullsh*t, whether you believe in God or not. So, don't take my remarks as anti-christian, rather anti-stupidity.

I've seen MUCH better arguments wrt events and/or history in relation to what the Bible says. This article has no sound basis.

So, sorry for being a bit crass in my remarks. But, seriously, even Christians shouldn't fall for this perverted twist of historical data.
A bit crass? Stupid, ignorant, mentally challenged? Express yourself without being crass then. My 5yo is more mature and intelligent than to use the word stupid. Please.
 

Nullifidian

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
You are kidding, right?A bit crass? Stupid, ignorant, mentally challenged? Express yourself without being crass then. My 5yo is more mature and intelligent than to use the word stupid. Please.
But this article IS stupid, B5150. It violates every law of science. It ignores extremely basic concepts and then tries to hide its own stupidity by attempting to shield itself with the bible.

Stop defending crazies like this who CLAIM to be Christian when really all they are doing is debasing that religion.

They are taking advantage of people's religious convictions in order to gain popular support for their lunacy. Don't support it. This isn't about religion. This is about stupidity. These people are stupid. Plain and simple.


I can find people who still attempt to claim the earth is flat because it says so in the bible. Those people are STUPID. There is simply no reason to tiptoe around that. There is no reason to give those people any intellectual respect because they are intellectually vapid.
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Stupidity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I find nothing wrong w/ using the word "stupid". It has meaning, just as any other word in the dictionary. Going w/ my statement that this article has no sound basis, I would find a person stupid (probably in-line w/ groupthink) if they really believed the information presented.

Ignorance, I can overlook.

Anywhoo... this is getting too dramatic. Sorry to anyone I offended. But, you have to admit, the article was pretty lame.
 
B5150

B5150

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
But this article IS stupid, B5150. It violates every law of science. It ignores extremely basic concepts and then tries to hide its own stupidity by attempting to shield itself with the bible.

Stop defending crazies like this who CLAIM to be Christian when really all they are doing is debasing that religion.

They are taking advantage of people's religious convictions in order to gain popular support for their lunacy. Don't support it. This isn't about religion. This is about stupidity. These people are stupid. Plain and simple.
I don't disagree with your sentiment. But, volatile words solicit volatile responses. I know you guys completely understand what I am talking about.

So with that, I'm gonna go because I know how this ends. Just be nice to each other. Its your community too :)
 
jomi822

jomi822

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
b fid your remarks and position as a moderator make it very difficult for people to continue to talk freely and comfortably in threads of this nature.

its obvious the discussion on this topic can be offensive. just let it fly. ive chosen to stay out of it because my views are clear and i can be offensive. why dont we both just stay out of it and watch.
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Nothing left to watch. Ain't nobody got the bawls to come in this here thread and say sumpin.

Jest.

This article falls under the "because the Bible says so" category. Again, I've seen good arguments. This isn't one of them.
 
jomi822

jomi822

Banned
Awards
1
  • Established
i just dont see how a person can choose faith over science, especially when they are conflicting. science provides proof. faith does not.

it is mindboggling. i feel that some people just are not comfortable without knowing it all. the bible provies all the answers. Science does not. i think it is a matter of comfort.
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
the bible provies all the answers. Science does not. i think it is a matter of comfort.
Some would share the opinion that this is a primary reason religion was invented. That and control.


 

BMW

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
I can find people who still attempt to claim the earth is flat because it says so in the bible. Those people are STUPID. There is simply no reason to tiptoe around that. There is no reason to give those people any intellectual respect because they are intellectually vapid.
the bible never states the earth is flat actually it states otherwise
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
the bible never states the earth is flat actually it states otherwise
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c015.html

----------------------

Some Bible critics have claimed that Revelation 7:1 assumes a flat earth since the verse refers to angels standing at the "four corners" of the earth. Actually, the reference is to the cardinal directions: north, south, east, and west. Similar terminology is often used today when we speak of the sun's rising and setting, even though the earth, not the sun, is doing the moving. Bible writers used the "language of appearance," just as people always have. Without it, the intended message would be awkward at best and probably not understood clearly. [DD]

In the Old Testament, Job 26:7 explains that the earth is suspended in space, the obvious comparison being with the spherical sun and moon. [DD]

A literal translation of Job 26:10 is "He described a circle upon the face of the waters, until the day and night come to an end." A spherical earth is also described in Isaiah 40:21-22 - "the circle of the earth."

Proverbs 8:27 also suggests a round earth by use of the word circle (e.g., New King James Bible and New American Standard Bible). If you are overlooking the ocean, the horizon appears as a circle. This circle on the horizon is described in Job 26:10. The circle on the face of the waters is one of the proofs that the Greeks used for a spherical earth. Yet here it is recorded in Job, ages before the Greeks discovered it. Job 26:10 indicates that where light terminates, darkness begins. This suggests day and night on a spherical globe. [JSM]

The Hebrew record is the oldest, because Job is one of the oldest books in the Bible. Historians generally [wrongly] credit the Greeks with being the first to suggest a spherical earth. In the sixth century B.C., Pythagoras suggested a spherical earth. [JSM]

Eratosthenes of Alexandria (circa 276 to 194 or 192 B.C.) calcuated the circumference of the earth "within 50 miles of the present estimate." [Encyclopedia Brittanica]

The Greeks also drew meridians and parallels. They identified such areas as the poles, equator, and tropics. This spherical earth concept did not prevail; the Romans drew the earth as a flat disk with oceans around it. [JSM]

The round shape of our planet was a conclusion easily drawn by watching ships disappear over the horizon and also by observing eclipse shadows, and we can assume that such information was well known to New Testament writers. Earth's spherical shape was, of course, also understood by Christopher Columbus. [DD]

The implication of a round earth is seen in the book of Luke, where Jesus described his return, Luke 17:31. Jesus said, "In that day," then in verse 34, "In that night." This is an allusion to light on one side of the globe and darkness on the other simultaneously. [JSM]

"When the Bible touches on scientific subjects, it is entirely accurate." [DD]

---------------------------
 

BMW

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c015.html

----------------------

Some Bible critics have claimed that Revelation 7:1 assumes a flat earth since the verse refers to angels standing at the "four corners" of the earth. Actually, the reference is to the cardinal directions: north, south, east, and west. Similar terminology is often used today when we speak of the sun's rising and setting, even though the earth, not the sun, is doing the moving. Bible writers used the "language of appearance," just as people always have. Without it, the intended message would be awkward at best and probably not understood clearly. [DD]

In the Old Testament, Job 26:7 explains that the earth is suspended in space, the obvious comparison being with the spherical sun and moon. [DD]

A literal translation of Job 26:10 is "He described a circle upon the face of the waters, until the day and night come to an end." A spherical earth is also described in Isaiah 40:21-22 - "the circle of the earth."

Proverbs 8:27 also suggests a round earth by use of the word circle (e.g., New King James Bible and New American Standard Bible). If you are overlooking the ocean, the horizon appears as a circle. This circle on the horizon is described in Job 26:10. The circle on the face of the waters is one of the proofs that the Greeks used for a spherical earth. Yet here it is recorded in Job, ages before the Greeks discovered it. Job 26:10 indicates that where light terminates, darkness begins. This suggests day and night on a spherical globe. [JSM]

The Hebrew record is the oldest, because Job is one of the oldest books in the Bible. Historians generally [wrongly] credit the Greeks with being the first to suggest a spherical earth. In the sixth century B.C., Pythagoras suggested a spherical earth. [JSM]

Eratosthenes of Alexandria (circa 276 to 194 or 192 B.C.) calcuated the circumference of the earth "within 50 miles of the present estimate." [Encyclopedia Brittanica]

The Greeks also drew meridians and parallels. They identified such areas as the poles, equator, and tropics. This spherical earth concept did not prevail; the Romans drew the earth as a flat disk with oceans around it. [JSM]

The round shape of our planet was a conclusion easily drawn by watching ships disappear over the horizon and also by observing eclipse shadows, and we can assume that such information was well known to New Testament writers. Earth's spherical shape was, of course, also understood by Christopher Columbus. [DD]

The implication of a round earth is seen in the book of Luke, where Jesus described his return, Luke 17:31. Jesus said, "In that day," then in verse 34, "In that night." This is an allusion to light on one side of the globe and darkness on the other simultaneously. [JSM]

"When the Bible touches on scientific subjects, it is entirely accurate." [DD]

---------------------------
nice :)
 
B5150

B5150

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
b fid your remarks and position as a moderator make it very difficult for people to continue to talk freely and comfortably in threads of this nature.
I find this very interesting. So you are say that you can't disagree with someone or something without calling it or the person stupid? Does speaking freely really require name calling? Is it more comfortable when you call someone derogatory names? I'm not getting you. I am finding it difficult to understand what is so difficult to understand. I am at a loss for words.

I have seen some Christian evangelists and some other Christians produce some incredibly preposterous theories and concepts based on their own reason and logic that even falls outside of Biblical 'truth'. I call it how I see it. But I don't use words like stupid or dumb when doing so.

I am not arguing or debating this thread topic with you guys. I only ask that you be respectful and polite to each other. If I don't do this, who will, and where or when will the line be drawn and at what consequence to the community atmosphere. How low do you want the community as a whole to drop so you can express yourself freely and comfortably. Because it seems like your comfort and freedom has a prerequisite that cost us, the community, our character and integrity. I could not care less what you guys agree or disagree on. Seriously I just don't care what you or anyone else believes.

I'm getting a headache :frustrate
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Does anyone else notice that most of the time, the Christian defense (or offense) comes down to, "... because the Bible says so." ?

I was watching a show (rented from my grandparent's church out of curiosity) which was a rebuttal to the DaVinci Code and things of that nature. Throughout the whole program, everything came down to, "That couldn't have happened. It says right there in the Bible." It was a very disappointing rebuttal, to say the least.

/off-topic


:ntome:
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Yes. But most don't even know what it says :)
Very true. I've not even read 1/2 of it word for word. But, I'm making progress.

I do enjoy many of the stories and meaning behind a lot of it.

But, as far as reality, I hold much doubt.

-------

Side note: I'm really enjoying a *student* version of the Bible. It has accompanying dialog that explains the who/what/when/where, which makes comprehension and integration of it all much more bearable.
 
B5150

B5150

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Well it is a fact that "the church" had omitted or restricted certain gospels from being included in the New Testament. It is speculated that there was an agenda and I am not beyond believing it to be true. I feel that this tampering further discredits the validity of the scriptures and supports some skeptics theories on its flaws and perceived contradictions.
 

BMW

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
the curches have blatantly changed parts of the bible most notably the kings james version
 
dsade

dsade

NutraPlanet Fanatic
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
The term "throwing X out the window" means compeltely disregarding "X". So "throwing science out the window" means compeltely disregarding science; i.e. ignoring science completely.
Ironic, since the media used to spread such ignorance (computers, the internet...even so much as the reactions required to create ink and paper) is made possible by....yep, science.
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Ironic, since the media used to spread such ignorance (computers, the internet...even so much as the reactions required to create ink and paper) is made possible by....yep, science.
Using Science to refute Science.



 

smc252

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
I used to date a preacher's daughter, boy was she fine..
Anyhow, her Dad was convinced carbon dating was bull**** and that science was as well. His excuse was that carbon dating is inaccurate because when there was floods, it would turn up the topsoil and mix stuff on top with stuff on bottom... uhhhh... and this changes carbon how?? He took EVERY word and sentence out of the bible as literal, as well.

No matter how many facts I showed him, he swore the earth was only 10,000yrs old and evolution was bull****. If we aren't here to evolve into something/someone better, what is the purpose of life? To blindly serve a God that doesn't exist?

If God was real, what created him? If he was created, is he still the all-knowing, most infinitely powerful being? If he wasn't created, then how can he exist? ...Ever since I was a child, that was one thing I always asked myself. I asked several priests and religous people, and none gave a decent answer.

I was born and raised a Christian my whole life, and swore nothing would change my faith. I even considered being a preist for aw while. I would never admit it, but I was more afraid of damnation, which in turn kept my faith and kept me from questioning it all.

I've read a lot of religious books, as well studying old texts reguarding religion and spiritually. Even took some courses on religions of the world. But living my life has shown me the truth more then anything; the only good and evil has nothing to do with a God. More or less, it's what we do to eachother that is either good or evil. This applies to everyone, religious and not.

I feel that religion spreads hate in the end, even if the followers are good people. There is zero room for free thought, it's a dictatorship in it's finest. Each religion and sect swears they are "the chosen ones." I don't mean to offend anyone by saying all this, but this is reality.

And by the way, there was never a man named Jesus Christ. His real name was Jmmanuel, pronounced Immanuel. His message was that of spiritual importance, not religious. His teachings were twisted into perversive ways to control people. Some of his original texts were rediscovered in the late 70s, yet hardly anyone knows about them. I find that bizzare as hell. As David Duchovny, aka Fox Mulder, used to say "The truth is out there" :)

-Steve
 

smc252

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
Well it is a fact that "the church" had omitted or restricted certain gospels from being included in the New Testament. It is speculated that there was an agenda and I am not beyond believing it to be true. I feel that this tampering further discredits the validity of the scriptures and supports some skeptics theories on its flaws and perceived contradictions.
Exactly! Someone gets it.

And not to mention, the stories and teachings of the bible were never a written document. It was a verbal tradition, passed down generation to generation. Then it was written down, and translated over and over again. There is no intelligent way to have faith in something of this sort.

The book of Mathews was a twisting of "Jesus's" teachings, and a lot was ommitted or changed. I even once saw a website comparing the two. Where a PHD studied them, line by line, for around 30yrs to try and disprove this theory. He ended up confirming it to be true!
 
Jayhawkk

Jayhawkk

Legend
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
It amazes me how some people hate how hard headed people can be when all the info is right there but yet they use the exact same thing arguing their point. It's great if you believe science and not religion. Whatever floats your boat but remember science has been just as wrong as religion. It usually comes down to interpretation of what's in front of them.

Don't feel threatened because B5150 believes in God and comes into a thread to tell people to be civil to each other. If you want to start a thread where all that is allowed it bashing of the opposite belief than Am isn't the place for you and feel free to leave.

These things are usually never to sway anyone's opinion but used as tools to either get a stir out of the opposite side or to pull more of the same belief on their side. However, the one thing we can control is how we handle ourselves and continue to show respect towards those who we are supposedly trying to talk to. The last thing you do to an audience is call them stupid unless your intent it to shut them off to your argument from the start.

B5150's beliefs aside he was here to make sure everyone was moderated...You know, his job.
 
Jayhawkk

Jayhawkk

Legend
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
There is no intelligent way to have faith in something of this sort.
This is the exact thing B was talking about. I don't care if your believe in God, science or dance around ****ing trees. Treat each other with respect or these threads can just stay dead.
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
I feel the same way wrt the blind faith following of the Bible.

It's like the old pot roast story...


Johnny noticed that his mother always cut off the ends of her pot roast. Every time. And it was delicious.

He asked his mother, "Mom, why do you cut the ends off of your pot roast?"

His mother replied, "Johnny, I do it because that's how my mother did it."

So, Johnny calls his grandmother on the telephone and asks, "Grandma, why do you cut the ends off of your pot roast?"

His grandmother replied, "Johnny, I do it because that's how my mother did it."

So, Johnny hops on his bike and rides to the nursing home and asks his great grandmother, "Great grandma, why did you cut the ends off of your pot roast."

His great grandmother replies, "Johnny, I did it because my pan was too small."



:box:



edit: btw, political and/or religious correctness can kiss my arse.
 
mmowry

mmowry

Board Sponsor
Awards
1
  • Established
edit: btw, political and/or religious correctness can kiss my arse.

IM glad the maturity level has risen since the mods asked the children to keep it civil.:blink:
 
ShakesAllDay

ShakesAllDay

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
IM glad the maturity level has risen since the mods asked the children to keep it civil.:blink:
What do we tell people that ask, "Should I squat?" "I'm gonna run D-bol for 2 moths to get HYOOGE!" ?

But, when it comes to religious beliefs, we have to be all civil and tip-toe.

BTW, being PC has little to do w/ being mature.
 
Jayhawkk

Jayhawkk

Legend
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
edit: btw, political and/or religious correctness can kiss my arse.
There's big difference between PC and being respectful if that remark was towards me.
 
Jayhawkk

Jayhawkk

Legend
Awards
2
  • Legend!
  • Established
Maybe because religion or even a lack of one isusually what people base most if not all of their life around and to make light by calling them stupid or ignorant is insulting a lot more than just whether or not they believe they should run DBOL and MIT while going on a drinking binge.

If you can't tell the difference or know the difference and my enlightenment has fallen on deaf ears then you may serve yourself well by staying out of these threads while the choice is yours.
 
B5150

B5150

Legend
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
In all matters we are to conduct ourselves with respect and civility while we are on this boards. We no more tolerate anyone disrespecting someone for their anabolic choices. Look throughout the board. We indiscriminately apply this across all topics and all members. I would have thought that those who claim to be more logical and reasonable would not need this very simple trait of character and integrity spelled out for them. This is our community and we accept, tolerate and respect all, regardless of their belief, moral or value system. This is not PC or anything other than civility, humility and respect for your fellow member. It is something that is not up for discussion or debate. This is the way this board is run and the community atmosphere that is enforced here at AM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads


Top