There are only 2 genders prove me wrong

DemonDevster

Member
Awards
0
How do people even consider the thought that there are even more than 2 genders (excluding hermaphrodite which are legit mistakes in the gentic code). Seriously though do these people loose contact with even the most basic levels of biology. Is it jist me does the concept of people claiming they are neither male or female seem beyond moronic and the fact people try to support these people. This just has me questioning how badly damaged have we become as a society that this level of pire retardation is allowed to flourish and is encouraged as normal behavour. They have started allowing kids to have hormone blockers so they can pick there own genders as well that is completely f***ed do you agree with this leftiest obomination practice.

What are your opions on this subject and if you are against the fact that there is only 2 genders (exempt hermaphrodites) what actual biological science do you have to back this up?
 
hairygrandpa

hairygrandpa

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
I see it this way too. WHY the hell should the majority change their language (pronouns) and bathrooms, to please a minority who decided to have a different gender than that whats showing in their pants? This will lead us to total chaos, because along comes a dude who claims to be a bird, now we have to install bathrooms in trees too?
 
hairygrandpa

hairygrandpa

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established


I'm a bird. I demand bathrooms in trees!
 

DemonDevster

Member
Awards
0
I feel like vader when i say leftiest scum must be eradicated (only the real extremeists aka the cancer cells)
 
hairygrandpa

hairygrandpa

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
I feel like vader when i say leftiest scum must be eradicated (only the real extremeists aka the cancer cells)

The whole "gender mess" was put in place by social media, where minorities could interact and gain momentum, why label them "left"?
I mean left means "being socialist" (where I come from) -and being "gender-fluid" does not go obviously the same direction. To me such movement cant be conservative either. I call for a new party, like the "twisted unicorn assembly", just to make it more clear.
 

DemonDevster

Member
Awards
0
This is american left alot are like angry toddlers when they dont get there way so like imagine a toddler style tantrum on a full blown adult with way to much estrogen
 
BennyMagoo79

BennyMagoo79

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Best Answer
Having met more than one person who has many characteristics of the opposite sex, I can understsnd how some seek to change their gender.

It doesnt bother me in the slightest.
 
BennyMagoo79

BennyMagoo79

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Best Answer
The whole "gender mess" was put in place by social media, where minorities could interact and gain momentum, why label them "left"?
I mean left means "being socialist" (where I come from) -and being "gender-fluid" does not go obviously the same direction. To me such movement cant be conservative either. I call for a new party, like the "twisted unicorn assembly", just to make it more clear.
If you are standing far to the right, then everyone else appears to "left".
 
BennyMagoo79

BennyMagoo79

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Best Answer
This is american left alot are like angry toddlers when they dont get there way so like imagine a toddler style tantrum on a full blown adult with way to much estrogen
The weirdest thing about this comment is you have just stated that an entire group of people need to be eradicated.

Who is having toddler style tantrums?
 
hairygrandpa

hairygrandpa

Legend
Awards
5
  • Best Answer
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
Having met more than one person who has many characteristics of the opposite sex, I can understsnd how some seek to change their gender.

It doesnt bother me in the slightest.
That does not bother me the slightest either.
OP is talking about the others, who claim to have NO particular gender, demanding even own pronouns and bathrooms for identifying as neither male or female. They go as far as to call it an "assault" if you don't use the correct pronoun, like one has telepathic powers to know it beforehand.
 
BennyMagoo79

BennyMagoo79

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
  • Best Answer
That does not bother me the slightest either.
OP is talking about the others, who claim to have NO particular gender, demanding even own pronouns and bathrooms for identifying as neither male or female. They go as far as to call it an "assault" if you don't use the correct pronoun, like one has telepathic powers to know it beforehand.
Oh, I failed to comprehend the OP.

Yeah, there is no condition that exists beyond male, female, both, or none. Its a binary concept.
 
EasyEJL

EasyEJL

Never enough
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
I think what really bothers me on this is the inherent internalized lack of tolerance in those who claim to be non-binary.

What I mean is


  • Men and women are equal
  • Heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality are accepted
  • Clothing has become virtually unisex and accepted (other than dresses/skirts for men)
  • Jewelery like earrings are acceptable for men

So what does "the sex you want to identify as" really mean? If you want to pretend gender isn't about genetics what difference at all does gender make unless you internally are intolerant to one of the above? You're a man who likes to have sex with other men and dress in silky shirts and wear floral perfume and dangly earrings? great, you're still a man. You're a woman who likes to wear old spice, suits and drive a Harley? Great you're still a woman.

I still personally don't understand how transsexuality (a bit different than what we're talking about here) isn't treated in the same way as other bodily dysmorphias like anorexia, bulimia and bigorexia
 
D3x

D3x

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
I think what really bothers me on this is the inherent internalized lack of tolerance in those who claim to be non-binary.

What I mean is


  • Men and women are equal
  • Heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality are accepted
  • Clothing has become virtually unisex and accepted (other than dresses/skirts for men)
  • Jewelery like earrings are acceptable for men

So what does "the sex you want to identify as" really mean? If you want to pretend gender isn't about genetics what difference at all does gender make unless you internally are intolerant to one of the above? You're a man who likes to have sex with other men and dress in silky shirts and wear floral perfume and dangly earrings? great, you're still a man. You're a woman who likes to wear old spice, suits and drive a Harley? Great you're still a woman.

I still personally don't understand how transsexuality (a bit different than what we're talking about here) isn't treated in the same way as other bodily dysmorphias like anorexia, bulimia and bigorexia
^this
 

DemonDevster

Member
Awards
0
Having met more than one person who has many characteristics of the opposite sex, I can understsnd how some seek to change their gender.

It doesnt bother me in the slightest.
Im not saying anything bad against trannies i mean the people who claim to identify as neither male or female e.g gender fluid. Transexuals are just going from one to another male to female or female to make so still fall under one of 2 gender.
 

DemonDevster

Member
Awards
0
The weirdest thing about this comment is you have just stated that an entire group of people need to be eradicated.

Who is having toddler style tantrums?
Its just their sheer stupidity is dangerous for this world its not mu having a tantrum its just me stating what i believe has to be done in order to redeem these people from this dilutional dream they are living in.
 

DemonDevster

Member
Awards
0
I think the appropriate thing to say is everyday we stray further from god. (im not religious)
 
justhere4comm

justhere4comm

Banned
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
This is american left alot are like angry toddlers when they dont get there way so like imagine a toddler style tantrum on a full blown adult with way to much estrogen
English is not abstract art.

I feel like vader when i say leftiest scum must be eradicated (only the real extremeists aka the cancer cells)
However, you appear to be a child with a magnifying glass searching for something to kill in order to get your undeveloped rocks off.

Its just their sheer stupidity is dangerous for this world its not mu having a tantrum its just me stating what i believe has to be done in order to redeem these people from this dilutional dream they are living in.
How is it 'dangerous'? How would you 'redeem' these people?
Don't bother answering those questions. There's something wrong with you.

I think the appropriate thing to say is everyday we stray further from god. (im not religious)
No. You're an imbecile-provocateur who wants to be justified in his hatred for something.
 
Young Gotti

Young Gotti

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Who am I to judge whatever someone wants to be labeled as?

However, who are they to judge if I don't live by those same rules?

to me the biggest problem is the snowflakes want us all to accept these ideas....personally I don't care how you live or identify as but you have to play by those same rules and not care when I don't accept those ideas into my own life
 
D3x

D3x

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
Who am I to judge whatever someone wants to be labeled as?

However, who are they to judge if I don't live by those same rules?

to me the biggest problem is the snowflakes want us all to accept these ideas....personally I don't care how you live or identify as but you have to play by those same rules and not care when I don't accept those ideas into my own life
Also this^ pretty much how I feel.. except for my thoughts on labels.. because I like classification and rules to define things.. order from chaos.. but that's just me cuz I have black and white thinking..
 
HIT4ME

HIT4ME

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
I think what really bothers me on this is the inherent internalized lack of tolerance in those who claim to be non-binary.

What I mean is


  • Men and women are equal
  • Heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality are accepted
  • Clothing has become virtually unisex and accepted (other than dresses/skirts for men)
  • Jewelery like earrings are acceptable for men

So what does "the sex you want to identify as" really mean? If you want to pretend gender isn't about genetics what difference at all does gender make unless you internally are intolerant to one of the above? You're a man who likes to have sex with other men and dress in silky shirts and wear floral perfume and dangly earrings? great, you're still a man. You're a woman who likes to wear old spice, suits and drive a Harley? Great you're still a woman.

I still personally don't understand how transsexuality (a bit different than what we're talking about here) isn't treated in the same way as other bodily dysmorphias like anorexia, bulimia and bigorexia
This is right in line with what I have noticed about a lot of the "accepting" elite who are better than anyone who might try to stick with tradition. A lot of their claims against bias are based in bias.

For instance, Roseanne calls a woman an ape and it is racist. But people on the "non-racist" side have called Trump the offspring of an orangutan and that was OK. Why? Because Trump is white. The differentiation of the two comments being right or wrong is ONLY based on the color of the subject's skin. Isn't the idea that skin color doesn't matter? If that is the standard than how is it OK to say something about a white person and not a black person? The color of your skin should be no different than the color of your hairs or eyes, and nobody ever says, "Oh you can't say that - his eyes are blue!!"

Not to turn this into a race comment - but I think you are applying similar logic that I agree with - it is ironic someone would choose to identify as something, and then expect to be treated differently, and then be upset they are being treated differently in another area.

And yes - people were born that way, or created, or whatever, but they can't accept it might be a "disease".

Biological success is the ability to produce viable off spring. Gender is obviously a huge factor in this. Any issues with this means you are non-functioning. If you have a low sperm count, lack eggs, are gay, transgender, etc. - you have functional issues. A lot of people will take offense with this, and I understand that, but it's no different than having cancer, or depression or whatever other number of diseases. You have an impaired function. And...lots of people do, not just one subgroup. Plenty of straight people have impaired biological functions and can't reproduce either. So live your life.

Who am I to judge whatever someone wants to be labeled as?

However, who are they to judge if I don't live by those same rules?

to me the biggest problem is the snowflakes want us all to accept these ideas....personally I don't care how you live or identify as but you have to play by those same rules and not care when I don't accept those ideas into my own life
This is so true. I think it gets back to personal responsibility. People want to make choices but not live with the outcomes of their decisions. I want to be "different" and I want to identify as that when it is to my psychological benefit, but I don't want anything negative to come with it. It has to be all sunshine and roses, no weeds.

And it's not just one group - it's most people nowadays. We try to use our issues as swords instead of shields.
 

DemonDevster

Member
Awards
0
English is not abstract art.



However, you appear to be a child with a magnifying glass searching for something to kill in order to get your undeveloped rocks off.



How is it 'dangerous'? How would you 'redeem' these people?
Don't bother answering those questions. There's something wrong with you.



No. You're an imbecile-provocateur who wants to be justified in his hatred for something.
Interesting theory, but you are wrong
 

DemonDevster

Member
Awards
0
Who am I to judge whatever someone wants to be labeled as?

However, who are they to judge if I don't live by those same rules?

to me the biggest problem is the snowflakes want us all to accept these ideas....personally I don't care how you live or identify as but you have to play by those same rules and not care when I don't accept those ideas into my own life
They are forcing it some states you can get arrested for saying someones pronouns wrong aka cali
 
justhere4comm

justhere4comm

Banned
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
Interesting theory, but you are wrong
I get it. Man / Woman. Grunt. Do you feel better?

To address the main title of your thread scientifically, which is what got my hackles up. Scientifically, you have no leg to stand on. There are 63 genders, [scientifically] speaking. Life goes on, and people will live as they wish. You've been scientifically proven wrong. (Pounds chest, eats banana...)


original.gif

Banana bad. Can we move on with our lives now?




63 Genders
fuckofflittleman.png
 
dillface02241

dillface02241

Member
Awards
1
  • First Up Vote
it's the damn media and millennials that allows and propagates this bull****. And ****, i have to move back to California where now they don't allow straws...wtf? Country is going downhill fast
 

DemonDevster

Member
Awards
0
Your personality likes to enlist others in your simplistic hatred of 'something'. It makes you feel big. I'm right.
Scientifically there are 63 genders, and as such you have been proven wrong.
Cold hard facts cant be changed they are set no matter what you say i mean this is basic biology. And am i insulting you quit beong sore and try and prove me wrong
 
Woody

Woody

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Cold hard facts cant be changed they are set no matter what you say i mean this is basic biology. And am i insulting you quit beong sore and try and prove me wrong
You can be born with a penis and vagina. Biologically speaking, of course.
 
justhere4comm

justhere4comm

Banned
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
it's the damn media and millennials that allows and propagates this bull****. And ****, i have to move back to California where now they don't allow straws...wtf? Country is going downhill fast
Seriously... damned straw haters.
 
Young Gotti

Young Gotti

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
I get it. Man / Woman. Grunt. Do you feel better?

To address the main title of your thread scientifically, which is what got my hackles up. Scientifically, you have no leg to stand on. There are 63 genders, [scientifically] speaking. Life goes on, and people will live as they wish. You've been scientifically proven wrong. (Pounds chest, eats banana...)


View attachment 168448

Banana bad. Can we move on with our lives now?




63 Genders
View attachment 168447
that chart is far from "scientific"...I never saw that before and started looking up some of those labels....wow that's hilarious stuff, it's all based on interpretation based on "culture" well someone can look at a culture one and way and another looks at it another way......who put that mess together?
 
HIT4ME

HIT4ME

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
You can be born with a penis and vagina. Biologically speaking, of course.
I feel like SFreed and hairygrandpa should have soooo many memes for this topic.
 
Whey

Whey

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
Obviously excluding those with both genitals

I still only see 2 genders lol ;)


But hey! Its 2018!!!
 
Whey

Whey

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
is there a new genital and new reproductive system?
 
HIT4ME

HIT4ME

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
I did mention excluding intersex
I don't even necessarily disagree, but I do see humor in the statement/inquiry: "Do you guys agree that if you exclude X number of genders, there are only 2 genders?"

Kind of like, "If you exclude the senses of taste, smell, touch and sound - there is only one sensory input?"
 
D3x

D3x

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
I feel like I should be able to sexually identify as an supra-masculine alpha male and receive hrt to be able to hormonally achieve how I see myself on the inside
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
Cold hard facts cant be changed they are set no matter what you say i mean this is basic biology. And am i insulting you quit beong sore and try and prove me wrong
Please don't claim something is basic biology when you get basic biology wrong in the first ****ing post. There are two sexes; there are many genders. Biological sex (i.e. male and female) is not the same as gender.

Now comrade, прекратить действовать как тролль!
 
Whey

Whey

Active member
Awards
1
  • Established
Please don't claim something is basic biology when you get basic biology wrong in the first ****ing post. There are two sexes; there are many genders. Biological sex (i.e. male and female) is not the same as gender.

Now comrade, прекратить действовать как тролль!
gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
noun: gender; plural noun: genders
1.
the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).


Oh S***...
 
Cgkone

Cgkone

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
This is right in line with what I have noticed about a lot of the "accepting" elite who are better than anyone who might try to stick with tradition. A lot of their claims against bias are based in bias.

For instance, Roseanne calls a woman an ape and it is racist. But people on the "non-racist" side have called Trump the offspring of an orangutan and that was OK. Why? Because Trump is white. The differentiation of the two comments being right or wrong is ONLY based on the color of the subject's skin. Isn't the idea that skin color doesn't matter? If that is the standard than how is it OK to say something about a white person and not a black person? The color of your skin should be no different than the color of your hairs or eyes, and nobody ever says, "Oh you can't say that - his eyes are blue!!"

Not to turn this into a race comment - but I think you are applying similar logic that I agree with - it is ironic someone would choose to identify as something, and then expect to be treated differently, and then be upset they are being treated differently in another area.

And yes - people were born that way, or created, or whatever, but they can't accept it might be a "disease".

Biological success is the ability to produce viable off spring. Gender is obviously a huge factor in this. Any issues with this means you are non-functioning. If you have a low sperm count, lack eggs, are gay, transgender, etc. - you have functional issues. A lot of people will take offense with this, and I understand that, but it's no different than having cancer, or depression or whatever other number of diseases. You have an impaired function. And...lots of people do, not just one subgroup. Plenty of straight people have impaired biological functions and can't reproduce either. So live your life.



This is so true. I think it gets back to personal responsibility. People want to make choices but not live with the outcomes of their decisions. I want to be "different" and I want to identify as that when it is to my psychological benefit, but I don't want anything negative to come with it. It has to be all sunshine and roses, no weeds.

And it's not just one group - it's most people nowadays. We try to use our issues as swords instead of shields.
WORD
 
Aleksandar37

Aleksandar37

Well-known member
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
gen·der
ˈjendər/
noun
noun: gender; plural noun: genders
1.
the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones).


Oh S***...
Yes, assigning somebody the designation male or female based on social/cultural criteria NOT biological. That is why genders can be more than two. Biologically there is male and female and the correct term is sex. Over the years, due to misuse, gender and sex have been used interchangeably, but that isn't correct.
 
Cgkone

Cgkone

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
They are forcing it some states you can get arrested for saying someones pronouns wrong aka cali
I'm no hippie, but I live in Cali bro, nobody is getting arrested for pronoun abuse.
I'm not calling people anything special.
 
Cgkone

Cgkone

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
I get it. Man / Woman. Grunt. Do you feel better?

To address the main title of your thread scientifically, which is what got my hackles up. Scientifically, you have no leg to stand on. There are 63 genders, [scientifically] speaking. Life goes on, and people will live as they wish. You've been scientifically proven wrong. (Pounds chest, eats banana...)


View attachment 168448

Banana bad. Can we move on with our lives now?




63 Genders
View attachment 168447
Common bro. You take a sample from somebody the chromosomes are male or female ,right?
 

Similar threads


Top