Too funny! Our military thinks of everything!!

[kwyckemynd00]

http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,11937748%5E13762,00.html

US military wanted 'sex bomb'
By Milanda Rout
January 14, 2005
A "SEX bomb" that would make enemy soldiers irresistible to each other was considered by the US military.

Declassified documents reveal the Pentagon toyed with the idea of an aphrodisiac chemical weapon in 1994.

The gas would have made enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. The weapon's developers said homosexual behaviour among troops would deal a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale.

The plans, unearthed from a US air force laboratory in Ohio, were published in New Scientist magazine.

 

[jarhead]

This is too good, I don't know where to start....

 

[jarhead]

Weapons of ASS destruction?

 

[jminis]

Weapons of ASS destruction?

LOL
I think that's going too far though. It's one thing to defeat your enemy it's another to humiliate them. If were not humble in our defeat were no better then them.

 

[ironviking]

LOL
I think that's going too far though. It's one thing to defeat your enemy it's another to humiliate them. If were not humble in our defeat were no better then them.

Humbel in defeat I can agree with but what is worse getting shot to death, hit with mustard gas which makes your skin blister, chlorine gas which fries your lungs, sarin which makes you flop around like a fish out of water before you die, biological weapons (Anthrax or worse), or having to explain to Mom why your foxhole buddy tried to pound you in ass.

I have to admit after I typed it all out Im not sure, it would be damn humiliating to get overrun while your platoon is in an orgy.
Atleast there is some glory in being killed while fighting for your country.

 

[kwyckemynd00]

Weapons of ASS destruction?

:rofl:

 

[size]

Here is more information on the topic:
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true

In all seriousness, I believe such approaches are excellent. Sometimes it is necessary to search "outside the box".

 

[kwyckemynd00]

In all seriousness, I believe such approaches are excellent. Sometimes it is necessary to search "outside the box".

I agree. But, it's still damn humerous, IMHO. :lol:

Thanks for the post.

 

[bigpetefox]

Here is more information on the topic:
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524823.800&print=true

In all seriousness, I believe such approaches are excellent. Sometimes it is necessary to search "outside the box".

Well, if this works we might see the enemy tryin' to get "in the box"...

 

[kwyckemynd00]

Well, if this works we might see the enemy tryin' to get "in the box"...

Ahh..no....fighting ....the...horrible....visual....that...just .....gave...me....