Partial Rep Bench Press - what's the problem again?

Page 1 of 2 12 Last
  1. New Member
    BrooklynBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    112
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    24.25%

    Partial Rep Bench Press - what's the problem again?


    Hi Everyone,

    I'm new to this board - hello.

    Been lifting for a few years, not too big not too ripped but I'm comfortable with where I'm at and trying to improve. (6'0", 220).

    I've gotten my best gains in chest strentgh using partial reps on the incline and flat bench. I've never understood why people looked down upon those of us who choose to do partials. I've I'm going halfway with 335, I'm not sure how you think that a full range 225 movement is going to stimulate MORE growth.

    Of course, I'm not talking about 1/16 reps either, but then again I see alot of advocates here and other places using static holds. So choose your poison, I guess.

    Either way, I've gotten nothing but results in terms of strength and size by using partial reps in the bench.

    That's not to say I don't warm up correctly and use a full range of motion on warmups and drops, but for my heaviest set - WITHOUT A SPOTTER - I'm going for partials.

    People talk about half reps not being "impressive". I'm not concerned with impressing anyone. I'm concerned about building muscle. And the two things that build muscle are heavy weights and sufficient protein / calories.

  2. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.84%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Honestly, I think full range of motion has good benefits as well and varying your types of workouts are important. Partial reps, negatives, static holds, etc etc.

    Maybe the partial rep is doing what you want it to do but using full range will allow movement of your other muscles and give full stimulus of the muscles...Someone like Bobo or the other certified and trained guys can give their valuable input but i'm up at 1 am so you get me

    I could be very wrong but I believe that all things equal you're not going to get the complete muscle package with 'just' doing partial reps on the bench. Since there are so many other muscles involved you're sort of cheating them by not using different methods...Or I could be full of ****. We'll know when the normal people wake up and read this :P
  3. Binging on Pure ****ing Rage
    Mulletsoldier's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,226
    Rep Power
    27066
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    41.21%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Mostly, and someone can correct me if I am wrong, that with a partial rep you are only partially contracting the muscle fibres. Especially on the eccentric (and most important for hypertrophy) portion of the lift. Couple that with the increased risk of tendon/ligament injury that you are putting yourself at by doing partial reps, and I don't see a point. If you have gotten good results with only partials, think how much you could get with actual reps.
    •   
       

  4. Board Supporter
    Rage (SoCal)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,928
    Rep Power
    1079
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    35.9%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    I'm sorry but this thread pisses me off. I think the OP is full of bull****. End of the story.
  5. New Member
    BrooklynBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    112
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    24.25%

    Quote Originally Posted by Rage (SoCal)
    I'm sorry but this thread pisses me off. I think the OP is full of bull****. End of the story.
    Thanks for two intelligent posts.

    Like I said, WITHOUT A SPOTTER I'm doing partials, and I've been doing them for 3 years with zero injury on the bench press. I've injured myself many more times doing full range - or what's considered full range - by pulling my shoulder tendons. The only thing I've gotten from partials is stronger on the full range.

    Also, not to be misunderstood: I'm not saying that partials should be done for all exercises, nor for every single workout. I'm saying that I think it's great for it to be thrown into your routine at some point, then testing your strength on the full movement. I guarantee you'll be stronger.

    If you think of the function of the pecs it's to bring your arms out in front of you. They're not beginning to contract, really, until you're just about halfway up from the bench, and are nearly fully recruited at the top. I say nearly because it is impossible to isolate the chest in the bench press. I think for Bench Pressing purposes, the partial rep is very valuable.

    It's also not possible to partially contract fibers. They all fire at once. You can put yourself into mechanical positions that will help stimulate a group a certain way, but the way you recruit more or less fibers depends on how much weight you are lifting, period.

    As for "Rage" LOL .. did a partial rep kick your ass one day or something?!

    Calling me full of **** only proves that you're the typical internet tough guy with zero to contribute. If you hate this topic so much, think about this: you took the time to reply. That's screaming for attention, bro. You should ask your therapist when the medication will kick in, and then hit the reply button.
  6. Elite Member
    bioman's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Age
    42
    Posts
    7,713
    Rep Power
    513545
    Level
    59
    Lv. Percent
    89.74%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityPosting ProPosting Authority

    Keep it civil gents. I don't think differing training styles is any reason to become peeved.

    If partials work for Brooklyn, then so be it. I have read studies indicating that there is no further benefit for the pec muscles by going lower than 90 degrees with your elbows. True? False? I dunno, but I prefer going a little lower to engauge some shoulder muscle as well. It doesn't hurt me..yet.
  7. New Member
    flytrapcan's Avatar
    Stats
    5'9"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    354
    Rep Power
    284
    Level
    15
    Lv. Percent
    54.54%

    Also, not to be misunderstood: I'm not saying that partials should be done for all exercises, nor for every single workout. I'm saying that I think it's great for it to be thrown into your routine at some point, then testing your strength on the full movement. I guarantee you'll be stronger. - BrooklynBB

    I agree.

    The problem most have with partial reps is there are those who do them consistently and don't even recognize they are doing a partial, and then they go and brag about the big weight they use.

    I hate the kids that think they are big men because they are squatting 5 plates, sounds good until you realize they are doing a weak partial. Everyone has that guy who just does not get it; he tries to press the same weight as the monster and does it for 1 or 2 reps at 1/8th the depth.

    I do partials, on occasion, for squats and Deads, for me a partial is a full rep pulled back far enough to allow maybe 2 extra plates on the squat or dead. Great for plateaus, or just plain old boredom.

    I don't profess to have any expertise in kinesiology. I just do what feels right. A lot of the time I do a partial rep at the top of my DB presses for shoulders and chest, actually legs as well - keeps constant tension on the muscle for me.

    The point is not to rely on a partial for the sake of doing extra weight, or to tell your buddy’s' how much you lift, but to execute a different training style for a period of time or a purpose. They are an advanced rep in my opinion and unless you already have the base, just stay away.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it.
    - Pablo Picasso
  8. Registered User
    CDB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    38
    Posts
    4,543
    Rep Power
    2677
    Level
    47
    Lv. Percent
    20.56%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by flytrapcan
    The problem most have with partial reps is there are those who do them consistently and don't even recognize they are doing a partial, and then they go and brag about the big weight they use.
    That pretty much sums it up.
  9. Recovering AXoholic
    thesinner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Age
    29
    Posts
    10,063
    Rep Power
    11893
    Level
    62
    Lv. Percent
    27.18%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    I've had a lot of success in the past few months with doing post-failure partials (x-reps as they call it at BB.com). I mean they brought up a good point when I was reading about them: why stop at your last full rep?


    Another thing is that I think doing your bench press to the full ******* position is gonna do more damage than a partial rep is ever going to do. That's when the most stress is on the shoulder joint.
  10. Registered User
    Beelzebub's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    6,684
    Rep Power
    10791
    Level
    55
    Lv. Percent
    69.82%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    i guess i'm stuck in the old school way of training. if you can't lift the weight correctly, reduce it and quit kidding yourself. JMO.
  11. Professional Member
    mixedup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    3,557
    Rep Power
    170773
    Level
    44
    Lv. Percent
    1.62%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    IF you are getting good results than there is nothing wrong with it like you said your are not interested in impressing anyone. Most people on here feel that you get better results and stimulate more muscle fiber. also We can not know what you mean by a partial rep do you mean 1/2 way 3/4 way down. I think from what I have read that if you get your elbows to at least 90% then you are ok and that can certainlly happen with going down to your chest 75% but without the 90 degree I think what happens is you cheat all the little supporting muscles
  12. New Member
    peterson24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    35
    Posts
    302
    Rep Power
    258
    Level
    14
    Lv. Percent
    55.12%

    Quote Originally Posted by flytrapcan
    I agree.
    I hate the kids that think they are big men because they are squatting 5 plates, sounds good until you realize they are doing a weak partial. Everyone has that guy who just does not get it; he tries to press the same weight as the monster and does it for 1 or 2 reps at 1/8th the depth.

    The point is not to rely on a partial for the sake of doing extra weight, or to tell your buddy’s' how much you lift, but to execute a different training style for a period of time or a purpose. They are an advanced rep in my opinion and unless you already have the base, just stay away.
    Good post. Partials are good for when you are doing floor presses or board presses to get past a sticking point or to try and get your body accustomed to heavier weight. I still prefer full movements though as I believe it helps me keep my flexability. I rather move up slowly in weight with full range and have everything strengthen up at the same time, shoulders, chest, etc. But this is all from my style of training too. Since I play sports, I rely more on a full body/power routine. I'm not interested in isolated movements for one body part as it will never help me in my sport. Anyway, I rarely have problems with my shoulders and If I do, I know its time to take a week off and relax. By the time I get back, I am ready to go again.

    To each their own, just stating my own opinion.
  13. Registered User
    myfathersboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    370
    Rep Power
    293
    Level
    15
    Lv. Percent
    70.59%

    Quote Originally Posted by flytrapcan
    I agree.

    The problem most have with partial reps is there are those who do them consistently and don't even recognize they are doing a partial, and then they go and brag about the big weight they use.

    I hate the kids that think they are big men because they are squatting 5 plates, sounds good until you realize they are doing a weak partial. Everyone has that guy who just does not get it; he tries to press the same weight as the monster and does it for 1 or 2 reps at 1/8th the depth.

    I do partials, on occasion, for squats and Deads, for me a partial is a full rep pulled back far enough to allow maybe 2 extra plates on the squat or dead. Great for plateaus, or just plain old boredom.

    I don't profess to have any expertise in kinesiology. I just do what feels right. A lot of the time I do a partial rep at the top of my DB presses for shoulders and chest, actually legs as well - keeps constant tension on the muscle for me.

    The point is not to rely on a partial for the sake of doing extra weight, or to tell your buddy’s' how much you lift, but to execute a different training style for a period of time or a purpose. They are an advanced rep in my opinion and unless you already have the base, just stay away
  14. Recovering AXoholic
    thesinner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Age
    29
    Posts
    10,063
    Rep Power
    11893
    Level
    62
    Lv. Percent
    27.18%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Quote Originally Posted by Beelzebub
    i guess i'm stuck in the old school way of training. if you can't lift the weight correctly, reduce it and quit kidding yourself. JMO.

    I guess whatever gives you the results you're looking for. As a bodybuilder, you could give a rat's ass if you're turning heads at the gym, it's all about making the gains and getting results. Whether it's partial reps or full reps or some other crazy scheme not yet mentioned, if it works, it works. So milk it for all it's worth.
  15. Binging on Pure ****ing Rage
    Mulletsoldier's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,226
    Rep Power
    27066
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    41.21%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Quote Originally Posted by Beelzebub
    i guess i'm stuck in the old school way of training. if you can't lift the weight correctly, reduce it and quit kidding yourself. JMO.
    Word.
  16. New Member
    BrooklynBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    112
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    24.25%

    Quote Originally Posted by Beelzebub
    i guess i'm stuck in the old school way of training. if you can't lift the weight correctly, reduce it and quit kidding yourself. JMO.
    Old School would translate into heavy pressing exercises and zero isolation. Are you training that way?

    But what does correct mean? Are we talking about powerlifting, powerbuilding or bodybuilding?

    I'm talking about Bodybuilding, and for my purposes I'm only interested in building muscle, not MASS, not a 1 or 3 rep max, but rather hypertrophy of muscle tissue.

    And just because people have been training a certain way for a while and it hasn't evolved (i.e., old school) that doesn't mean it's the best way to train.

    To clarify: Someone asked what I meant by a partial. On bench presses I'm talking where your elbows do not go past your chest level on the bottom portion, so you can consider that a 1/2 rep. I'm not talking about 1/4 reps or static holds.
  17. Advanced Member
    PVSkyHigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    31
    Posts
    559
    Rep Power
    388
    Level
    18
    Lv. Percent
    95.53%

    BrooklynBB, For the last three years, maybe even a little longer, I haven't taken any of my barbell bench presses any further than when my arms reach 90 degrees, and I have gained more size and strength than I ever did before. For me, lowering the weight to where my arms are perpendicular is the most beneficial. I could do full bench presses and never gain any size or strength in my chest. It may be because of my long arms and narrow shoulders, but nonetheless, it works for me. I am with you on not going down all the way!
  18. Registered User
    Beelzebub's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    6,684
    Rep Power
    10791
    Level
    55
    Lv. Percent
    69.82%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    don't fix what ain't broke.

    if it works for ya, why worry about feedback from others? what was the point of this thread anyway?
  19. New Member
    peterson24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    35
    Posts
    302
    Rep Power
    258
    Level
    14
    Lv. Percent
    55.12%

    Quote Originally Posted by BrooklynBB
    I'm talking about Bodybuilding, and for my purposes I'm only interested in building muscle, not MASS, not a 1 or 3 rep max, but rather hypertrophy of muscle tissue.
    Building muscle is the same as building mass. You can build muscle powerlifting or bodybuilding. I am going to assume you mean you rather look nice and ripped rather than strong. Bodybuilding stuff has its place, but IMO, especially if you participate in sports, body building stuff leaves you open to more injuries because you have a better chance of muscle imbalance as opposed to Old School such as powerlifting.

    Quote Originally Posted by BrooklynBB
    And just because people have been training a certain way for a while and it hasn't evolved (i.e., old school) that doesn't mean it's the best way to train.
    If training for athletics, I can't see any other way of training, IMO. I can't recall one sport I have ever participated in which required me to make an isolated movement with one muscle.

    Quote Originally Posted by BrooklynBB
    To clarify: Someone asked what I meant by a partial. On bench presses I'm talking where your elbows do not go past your chest level on the bottom portion, so you can consider that a 1/2 rep. I'm not talking about 1/4 reps or static holds.
    Powerlifters do things like this also, like floor presses, rack presses, etc but I stated this before.
  20. Registered User
    rocketscientist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    46
    Posts
    227
    Rep Power
    220
    Level
    12
    Lv. Percent
    73.35%

    flytrapcan summed it up pretty nicely. The issue here is really that benchpress and squats are so commonly seen as a measure of strength that we have trouble avoiding this perception when we really shouldn't care. And since we're all very compeditive in a way or two, doing partials will be seen as cheating and nobody likes cheaters (unless we're the ones that cheat - then it's called 'clever' ).

    As an example this video in the other thread is funny not because this kid is doing partials, but because he's obviously intending to demonstrate his strength but uses terrible form (and also because he hired a comic relief as his spotter).

    You'll hear the same comments when someone bounces the weight off his chest, lifts his butt off the bench etc. On the other hand hardly anyone cares if someone does partial curls (which are extremely common if you look around).
  21. Registered User
    Beelzebub's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    6,684
    Rep Power
    10791
    Level
    55
    Lv. Percent
    69.82%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by BrooklynBB
    Old School would translate into heavy pressing exercises and zero isolation. Are you training that way?

    But what does correct mean? Are we talking about powerlifting, powerbuilding or bodybuilding?

    I'm talking about Bodybuilding, and for my purposes I'm only interested in building muscle, not MASS, not a 1 or 3 rep max, but rather hypertrophy of muscle tissue.

    And just because people have been training a certain way for a while and it hasn't evolved (i.e., old school) that doesn't mean it's the best way to train.

    To clarify: Someone asked what I meant by a partial. On bench presses I'm talking where your elbows do not go past your chest level on the bottom portion, so you can consider that a 1/2 rep. I'm not talking about 1/4 reps or static holds.
    answering in paragraph order:

    yes

    correct has one meaning, regardless of how you train. and then there's incorrect.

    bodybuilder that wants muscle and not mass......

    never said it was the best way, you're quite defensive. my guess is you've had this conversation before and you came here for approval of half-repping.

    refer to previous post, don't fix what ain't broke.
  22. New Member
    BrooklynBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    112
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    24.25%

    Quote Originally Posted by Beelzebub
    answering in paragraph order:

    yes

    correct has one meaning, regardless of how you train. and then there's incorrect.

    bodybuilder that wants muscle and not mass......

    never said it was the best way, you're quite defensive. my guess is you've had this conversation before and you came here for approval of half-repping.

    refer to previous post, don't fix what ain't broke.
    Ok, so define "Correct". It's interesting that in the world of HIT, WestSide, Doggcrapp, Weider, MAX OT and all of the other training protocols out there you'd be bold enough to state that there is "correct" and then incorrect. If that's the case, please tell me which of the above is incorrect, and which is correct.

    It doesn't make sense to you that I want muscle and not mass? What's confusing about that?

    Being defensive would have been me saying "You're wrong, I'm right, here's why". Instead, I said that just because you think one way of training is good, doesn't mean it's the best.

    Trust me, I need no validation for performing half reps. The purpose of me starting this thread, honestly, was to prove to friends that I spoke to in the gym the following statement:

    "Watch how many people attack me for advocating the use of half reps without explanation". Thanks for proving my point.

    If everyone had the mentality to not fix something that isn't broke, we'd still be riding a horse and carriage instead of using airplanes. Something to think about.
  23. Registered User
    Beelzebub's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    6,684
    Rep Power
    10791
    Level
    55
    Lv. Percent
    69.82%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by BrooklynBB
    Ok, so define "Correct". It's interesting that in the world of HIT, WestSide, Doggcrapp, Weider, MAX OT and all of the other training protocols out there you'd be bold enough to state that there is "correct" and then incorrect. If that's the case, please tell me which of the above is incorrect, and which is correct.

    It doesn't make sense to you that I want muscle and not mass? What's confusing about that?

    Being defensive would have been me saying "You're wrong, I'm right, here's why". Instead, I said that just because you think one way of training is good, doesn't mean it's the best.

    Trust me, I need no validation for performing half reps. The purpose of me starting this thread, honestly, was to prove to friends that I spoke to in the gym the following statement:

    "Watch how many people attack me for advocating the use of half reps without explanation". Thanks for proving my point.

    If everyone had the mentality to not fix something that isn't broke, we'd still be riding a horse and carriage instead of using airplanes. Something to think about.
    i don't know of any program that calls for half reps. in powerlifting, there are uses for boards and such but that's for a different purpose - to improve ******* power and the top end of bench.

    i think i now see what you mean by mass. is it fluff (fat) that you're concerned about? mass (muscle mass) is what bodybuilders strive for. so, when you simply say 'muscle' and not 'mass', it doesn't add up to me. but if you are implying fat, then i digress.

    once again, never said it was best.

    comparing how technology advances to half reps in the gym is not a good comparison IMO. but we're getting off topic.

    mainly, my quarrel with half reppers is their total disregard for the other half of the rep. i've met and talked to many of them. and i'm willing to bet if i met you in the gym and asked you how much you bench, you would undoubtedly say "335" and not say "i half rep 335". same with half-squatters, etc. but when you question them when seeing them perform half-reps, they defend it in the same fashion you do - "it doesn't matter to me, i don't want to impress other people". ok, that's all fine and dandy, but if they truly don't care what others think, they would respond to the previous question with "i half rep 335", because after all, they don't care.

    furthermore, it's a slap in the face to a legitimate bench when someone says "i bench 405lbs" and you see them doing one of those half or quarter rep deals as posted recently in another thread. when someone can perform a legitimate full bench, squat, dead, etc. - it means something. it's a feat. half reps are a joke, they're a hint of how they treat everything in real life. why bother doing the whole job when i can just do half and get by with it? i mean at least i did something right? because after all, i don't care what the others think.

    eh, but what the **** do i know? i just lift. keep doing your half reps and if you're happy with it, don't worry about what guys like me say - we're obviously wrong and didn't advance with society.
  24. I am faster than 80% of all snakes
    Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,911
    Rep Power
    7019

    I've seen partials used in some collegiate football programs. It supposedly helps with exercises that have an ascending strenght curve such as bench press and squats.

    It was used for more performance though.
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  25. Registered User
    Beelzebub's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    6,684
    Rep Power
    10791
    Level
    55
    Lv. Percent
    69.82%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    bobo, from your experience - do partial reps (specifically bench press) offer any additional benefit? and vice versa - does full range offer any additional benefit when in comparison to half reps?
  26. Senior Member
    LCSULLA's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  197 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Age
    43
    Posts
    1,759
    Rep Power
    1025
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    89.96%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Half-reps have there place in training. Chuck Sipes used them at the tail end of his bench workout.
    The only time I take exception with people that do partials is when the misrepresent themselves. "I can bench X amount of weight" And then you find out they are doing 1/8 reps or something.
    But if this is working why change it?
  27. Board Supporter
    guyfromkop2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    37
    Posts
    936
    Rep Power
    582
    Level
    23
    Lv. Percent
    84.55%

    if you want to say you bench 335 then go to the chest, no if's and's or but's about it. if you want to do partials then add some boards and say you can bench 335 off a 1 2 3 4 or 5 board. you're not using all the muscles if you're not touching the bar to your chest. it's kind of like when you see a guy squatting and he's 4 inches above parallel, it's not a squat.
  28. The horror
    colkurtz_spf's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  231 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,109
    Rep Power
    675
    Level
    25
    Lv. Percent
    29.02%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    I used to do partial squats because of an old back injury. I think it helped me in the beginning, but switching to full range made a world of difference. More muscles were recruited and my body responded. In time I was able to match the weight of my partials.

    As for X-reps, I've tried them and they worked for me. Although I can't seem to do them for more than 6 weeks before I feel overtrained...maybe if I would have tried them 20 or 30 years ago...
    Last edited by colkurtz_spf; 05-13-2006 at 05:32 PM.
  29. I am faster than 80% of all snakes
    Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,911
    Rep Power
    7019

    Quote Originally Posted by Beelzebub
    bobo, from your experience - do partial reps (specifically bench press) offer any additional benefit? and vice versa - does full range offer any additional benefit when in comparison to half reps?
    Maybe.

    I could make an arguement for it based on what I've seen and what has been studied but partials isnt the same as using boards because with boards your rep TUT isn't increased compared to many partials where the overall time/rep is increased. Generally when I've seen people do partials its a much slower pace and stopping mid rep is a pretty tough thing to do when weight is increased and there isn't anything supporting it. But these people are doing it for a specific purpose, not stating that is their "bench press". They incorporate partials into their full range of motion exercises. They arne't bodybuilders either. OTOH I've also seen where the weight is lightened and the reps are much faster such ascending strnegh curve type exericses such as bench press and squats where they work on explosiveness at the first half of the concetric action. THis is primarily for performance though and wouldn't do anything for mass.

    So overall I could see it working somewhat simply because the rep TUT is increased while the weight is increased but its usually a very slow controlled rep. At the same token you can probably accomplish the same tihng (in terms of muscle gain
    ) by slowing it down and performing the the rep with a full range of motion.
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  30. New Member
    BrooklynBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    112
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    24.25%

    Quote Originally Posted by Beelzebub
    i think i now see what you mean by mass. is it fluff (fat) that you're concerned about? mass (muscle mass) is what bodybuilders strive for. so, when you simply say 'muscle' and not 'mass', it doesn't add up to me. but if you are implying fat, then i digress.

    once again, never said it was best.

    comparing how technology advances to half reps in the gym is not a good comparison IMO. but we're getting off topic.

    mainly, my quarrel with half reppers is their total disregard for the other half of the rep. i've met and talked to many of them. and i'm willing to bet if i met you in the gym and asked you how much you bench, you would undoubtedly say "335" and not say "i half rep 335".

    eh, but what the **** do i know? i just lift. keep doing your half reps and if you're happy with it, don't worry about what guys like me say - we're obviously wrong and didn't advance with society.
    I completely agree with you on abusing half reps and people who say "I bench 400" and really are just half-repping. I guess I should have stated that half-reps should be incorporated into your routine to blast through sticking points, and they've worked for me. Not that Half-Reps are some sort of magic routine.

    No, I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just trying to keep an open mind. I think you're right everything you said in your last post, but the other ones it sounded like you implied half-reps had no place in training. We both misunderstood each other, but I see where you're coming from. I definitely don't want to see kids abusing the half - rep. And I definitely don't count my max lift in terms of half reps.
  31. New Member
    BrooklynBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    112
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    24.25%

    Quote Originally Posted by guyfromkop2
    you're not using all the muscles if you're not touching the bar to your chest. it's kind of like when you see a guy squatting and he's 4 inches above parallel, it's not a squat.
    This is absolutely false, and i'll prove it to you right now.

    Stand in front of a wall with your hands slightly wider than shoulder width, or whatever width you use for your bench press. Now press your chest up against the wall. Try to flex your pecs. You'll find that only your outer pecs and delts are recruited. Now slowly step back. With each step you'll find your chest being more maximally recruited.

    Your pecs are not fully contracted until your arms are fully extended and hands out in front of you.

    A guy 4 inches above parallel with 500 on the bar is going to be able to squat 315 - 350 no problem for reps. I'm not talking about half - repping with 2 plates or 3 plates. I'm talking heavy weights - 500 and up.

    Again, bodybuilding. Not powerlifting or trying to win a competition in max lifts.
  32. New Member
    BrooklynBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13
    Rep Power
    112
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    24.25%

    Quote Originally Posted by peterson24
    Building muscle is the same as building mass. You can build muscle powerlifting or bodybuilding. I am going to assume you mean you rather look nice and ripped rather than strong.
    Building mass is not the same as building muscle. Mass is a combination of by-products from metabolism, water retention and muscle.

    Of course you build muscle with both bodybuilding and powerlifting. I don't remember implying that you can't, that'd be stupid.

    Anyone can be nice and ripped. That's not what bodybuilding was the last I checked. Bodybuilding is being able to show huge muscular development even in a depleted state with focus on proportion and balance.



    Quote Originally Posted by peterson24
    Bodybuilding stuff has its place, but IMO, especially if you participate in sports, body building stuff leaves you open to more injuries because you have a better chance of muscle imbalance as opposed to Old School such as powerlifting.

    I'm guessing what you mean by bodybuilding "stuff" is too many isolation movements. I agree. My routine has as it's backbone movements the bench press, squat and deadlift. The rest are added depending on what I feel needs to come up or down.

    But if you think a guy doing 50 pound dumbbell curls is less susceptible to injury then a guy trying to pull 800 pounds from the floor, then we have a disagreement.

    Then again, I'm not talking about general athletics. Just bodybuilding.

    Quote Originally Posted by peterson24
    If training for athletics, I can't see any other way of training, IMO. I can't recall one sport I have ever participated in which required me to make an isolated movement with one muscle.
    What method of training are you talking about? Powerlifting? So you're saying powerlifting is beneficial for general athletics but specificity training isn't?

    Quote Originally Posted by peterson24
    Powerlifters do things like this also, like floor presses, rack presses, etc but I stated this before.
    Didn't see where you posted that, but yes. Those are all examples of partial movements. That's why I'm fascinated when people get angry or defensive when I suggest partial rep benches and squats would be just as beneficial as partial rep deadlifts (I.e., RACK PULLS) and floor presses (i.e., HALF REP benches!)
  33. Board Supporter
    guyfromkop2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    37
    Posts
    936
    Rep Power
    582
    Level
    23
    Lv. Percent
    84.55%

    Quote Originally Posted by BrooklynBB
    This is absolutely false, and i'll prove it to you right now.

    Stand in front of a wall with your hands slightly wider than shoulder width, or whatever width you use for your bench press. Now press your chest up against the wall. Try to flex your pecs. You'll find that only your outer pecs and delts are recruited. Now slowly step back. With each step you'll find your chest being more maximally recruited.

    Your pecs are not fully contracted until your arms are fully extended and hands out in front of you.

    A guy 4 inches above parallel with 500 on the bar is going to be able to squat 315 - 350 no problem for reps. I'm not talking about half - repping with 2 plates or 3 plates. I'm talking heavy weights - 500 and up.

    Again, bodybuilding. Not powerlifting or trying to win a competition in max lifts.

    you've spent too much time on bodybuilding.com

    and what's the point of this thread? is it going to help make someone stronger? build muscle better? anything related to strength? or are you just trying to get a point across that bench specialists across the world would laugh at if they saw this thread?
  34. Elite Member
    BigVrunga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    39
    Posts
    5,063
    Rep Power
    2685
    Level
    49
    Lv. Percent
    27.01%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    I like to do heavy partials on the squat a couple times a month for my last set. I set the rails lower and lower each time and after a few weeks Im doing full reps with the heavier weights. I was able to get my squat over 400 this way. Which isnt much, but I was pretty happy

    I dont think a workout should consist of all partials unless its part of a powerlifting routine where your working chest a few days a week, and one of those days is partials/board presses. Working the muscle through its full range of motion is important - you might build a stack of mass with only partial reps but it would suck for strength and flexibility.

    BV
  35. Recovering AXoholic
    thesinner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Age
    29
    Posts
    10,063
    Rep Power
    11893
    Level
    62
    Lv. Percent
    27.18%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Quote Originally Posted by BigVrunga
    I like to do heavy partials on the squat a couple times a month for my last set. I set the rails lower and lower each time and after a few weeks Im doing full reps with the heavier weights. I was able to get my squat over 400 this way. Which isnt much, but I was pretty happy
    That's a pretty clever idea.
  36. Registered User
    CDB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    38
    Posts
    4,543
    Rep Power
    2677
    Level
    47
    Lv. Percent
    20.56%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by thesinner
    That's a pretty clever idea.
    That's how I had my first knee injury. I admit it works, just make sure your joints are in order. As with steroids, push yourself too hard and you can get hurt.
  37. Registered User
    Beelzebub's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  240 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    36
    Posts
    6,684
    Rep Power
    10791
    Level
    55
    Lv. Percent
    69.82%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by CDB
    push yourself too hard and you can get hurt.
    same with dropping a deuce
  38. Registered User
    CDB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    38
    Posts
    4,543
    Rep Power
    2677
    Level
    47
    Lv. Percent
    20.56%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by Beelzebub
    same with dropping a deuce
    Yeah, but it's just unsanitary to do partials in that context.
  39. Binging on Pure ****ing Rage
    Mulletsoldier's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  215 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,226
    Rep Power
    27066
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    41.21%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Quote Originally Posted by CDB
    Yeah, but it's just unsanitary to do partials in that context.
    Hey man, in disgusting public ****ters, the sky crane is a necessity. I'm simply not a nester.
  40. Elite Member
    BigVrunga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    39
    Posts
    5,063
    Rep Power
    2685
    Level
    49
    Lv. Percent
    27.01%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting ProPosting Authority

    That's how I had my first knee injury. I admit it works, just make sure your joints are in order. As with steroids, push yourself too hard and you can get hurt.
    Oh I totally agree there - stoping halfway through a rep with heavy weight is stressful on the joint that's bearing the load...Ill only do those 1-2 times a month and only on my last set. Usually after 2 warm up sets and 3-4 sets of 8-12 full ROM reps. (well , a little below parallel for me)

    BV
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Am I gripping the BB too close for bench pressing?
    By Rock Lee in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 09-27-2013, 09:49 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-25-2009, 02:31 PM
  3. Bench Press full ROM vs. Partial reps
    By FitModel in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-10-2008, 12:31 AM
  4. keep on coughing what is the problem
    By 1ad man in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 202
    Last Post: 06-21-2007, 12:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in