US Has Worst Health Outcomes - AnabolicMinds.com
    • US Has Worst Health Outcomes


      From NaturalNews

      From the Anabolic Minds Editor: I really hate articles like this. It uses details from a study to "prove" something that has next to nothing to do with the findings of the study, but makes for a good emotional message. The part that is the worst is "The researchers found that the United States ranked worst or nearly worst in nine separate measures of national health: chronic lung disease; disability; drug-related death; HIV and AIDS; heart disease; obesity and diabetes; infant mortality and low birth weight; injury and homicide; and teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. " Anyone with the slightest common sense understands that virtually all of these are related to personal choices. The quality of a health care system does not define teen pregnancy rates, that is a society/cultural issue. Similarly with obesity, sexually transmitted diseases, etc. Similarly later it mentions how US men have a lower lifespan with most of it due to deaths before 50. Of course its mostly deaths before 50 because its deaths in the military, deaths due to traffic accidents, etc. Not health care related deaths. So always take what you read from a study with a grain of salt, just because its researchers supported a finding doesn't guarantee its accuracy. For something like the stated goal of this study, it would have been better to compare outcomes of people diagnosed with specific life threatening conditions in the US and other countries, and compare the outcomes....

      Residents of the United States are less healthy than those in any other wealthy country, according to a report from the National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. This is true in spite of the fact that the United States spends more on health care than any other country.

      U.S. residents suffer from higher rates of disease and injury and have shorter lifespans, the report found. This is true for people of every age up to 75, regardless of insurance status, race or ethnicity, socioeconomic status, college education, or even prevalence of healthy behaviors.

      "We were struck by the gravity of these findings," said Steven H. Woolf of Virginia Commonwealth University, a member of the panel that issued the report.

      "Americans are dying and suffering at rates that we know are unnecessary because people in other high-income countries are living longer lives and enjoying better health. What concerns our panel is why, for decades, we have been slipping behind."

      A comprehensive review

      The report is the first to comprehensively analyze mortality, incidence of disease and injury, and health behavior across the entire life span for 17 separate wealthy countries, including the United States, Australia, Canada, Japan and a number of European nations.

      The researchers found that the United States ranked worst or nearly worst in nine separate measures of national health: chronic lung disease; disability; drug-related death; HIV and AIDS; heart disease; obesity and diabetes; infant mortality and low birth weight; injury and homicide; and teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.

      Strikingly, many of these problems fall most heavily upon children and adolescents. This likely contributes to the fact that the United States has the highest infant mortality of any wealthy country, and has for decades. The United States also ranks consistently poorly on rates of premature birth and childhood survival to age 5.

      Other major U.S. health problems also affect the young more strongly. The U.S. has the highest rates of teen pregnancy among any country studied, and among the highest rates of adolescent deaths from traffic accidents or homicide. In fact, the life expectancy among U.S. males is dramatically lower than that in the other countries, and nearly two-thirds of this difference is attributable to death before the age of 50.

      "It's a tragedy. Our report found that an equally large, if not larger, disadvantage exists among younger Americans," Woolf said. "I don't think most parents know that, on average, infants, children, and adolescents in the U.S. die younger and have greater rates of illness and injury than youth in other countries."

      The report enumerated many of the reasons that the U.S. lags so far behind comparable nations in most health outcomes, and noted that public health officials could start remedying many of these factors immediately.

      "Research is important, but we should not wait for more data before taking action, because we already know what to do," Woolf said. "If we fail to act, the disadvantage will continue to worsen and our children will face shorter lives and greater rates of illness than their peers in other rich nations."

      (Natural News Science)

      Sources for this article include:http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0109124235.htm

      Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038676_US...#ixzz2HxhoSgfD
      Comments 5 Comments
      1. huggy77's Avatar
        huggy77 -
        i really love our new editor, i was just about to basically state everything he just did in a comment! Bravo!
      1. mr.cooper69's Avatar
        mr.cooper69 -
        We just had a healthcare unit in med school and I can't tell you how cherrypicked/BS this article is. Stay far away from Natural News.
      1. Torobestia's Avatar
        Torobestia -
        The ScienceDaily article provides further discussion on the issue and addresses the concerns of the a.m. editor.
      1. MANotaur's Avatar
        MANotaur -
        i hate this liberal agenda geared towards socialized healthcare! and our editor could not have been more spot on with his forword! i tip my hat to you sir!
      1. bachelard's Avatar
        bachelard -
        I don't know where the editor is getting his "facts" or how they effectively argue against a single-payer system of healthcare. (Source, please.) People do indeed make unhealthy choices. Are you suggesting that such people not be provided health care if they can't afford it? Who will make that determination? Talk about "death panels."

        The whining about socialism is tedious. Over 50 percent of our health care is already paid by the government, yet we spend far more money on health care than other countries. Who cares if a single-payer system is called socialism? (It isn't under the actual definition of socialism.) That's just scare tactics.

        What about being taxed to maintain roads, fire departments, police forces, veteran health care, research in medicine, etc etc etc? Is this socialism too?