• Corrupt Scientists And HFCS

      By Carl Lenore, SuperHuman Radio

      Three things wrong with the below Press Release. First of all, the author is an "Advisor" to the soft drink industry. Second, he receives, grants from the Corn Refiners Association, and last but by no means least, his argument is that HFCS is no "worst" than table sugar. Has he not gotten the memo yet that its the sugary drinks and overall consumption of sugar in foods that is killing this Country? Really!? So its like saying.. hey our poison isn't any worst than the other poisins THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO AVOID - Carl

      Scientists conclude high fructose corn syrup should not be blamed for obesity

      A new article published today in International Journal of Obesity found there is no evidence to suggest the current obesity epidemic in the United States can be specifically blamed on consumption of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS).

      The commentary concludes that after an extensive review of all available HFCS research, there is overwhelming evidence showing HFCS is nutritionally equivalent to sugar. This opinion is in-line with the American Medical Association and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, both of which concluded that HFCS is not a unique cause of obesity.

      The authors state that while there has been a large amount of debate in the media about the impact of HFCS on obesity levels, the fact is "Sucrose (sugar) and HFCS are very similar in compositionů.and are absorbed identically in the human GI tract."

      "The public discussion about HFCS will likely continue to rage on and more studies will be conducted," said James M. Rippe, M.D., Founder and Director of the Rippe Lifestyle Institute, and Professor of Biomedical Sciences at the University of Central Florida, one of the article's authors. "However, at this point there is simply no evidence to suggest that the use of HFCS alone is directly responsible for increased obesity rates or other health concerns."

      The article goes on to discuss a number of research trials that have been conducted on the issue of HFCS and obesity, and concludes that at this time the evidence shows no short-term health differences between the use of HFCS or sugar could be detected in humans. Weight gain, glucose levels, insulin and appetite were not adversely affected by the use HFCS over sugar.

      The commentary was co-authored with Dr. Rippe by David M. Klurfeld, Ph.D. of the USDA Agricultural Research Service, John Foreyt, Ph.D. of Baylor College of Medicine, and Theodore J. Angelopoulos, Ph.D., MPH Professor and Director, Laboratory of Applied Physiology Department of Health Professions at University of Central Florida.

      HFCS was developed in the mid-1960's as a more flexible alternative to sugar and was widely embraced by the food industry. The use of HFCS grew rapidly from 1970-1999 where usage peaked. Since 1999, the use of HFCS has declined while obesity rates have continued to rise. Sucrose is still the dominant sweetener worldwide with over nine times the consumption of HFCS.

      Dr. Rippe is a cardiologist and graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Medical School. His research laboratory has conducted numerous studies and published widely in the areas of nutrition and weight management. He is an advisor to the food and beverage industry and has received unrestricted educational grants from the Corn Refiners Association. He is the Founder and Director of the Rippe Lifestyle Institute, and Professor of Biomedical Sciences at the University of Central Florida.

      Source: http://www.superhumanradio.com/openl...ble-sugar.html
      Comments 2 Comments
      1. rambofireball's Avatar
        rambofireball -
        This guy needs to learn how to speak Englisht before he writes any more articlest.
      1. bpmartyr's Avatar
        bpmartyr -
        Sugar is sugar. You are eating more than you burn people, that's why you are fat.
    • This Week's Most Popular

        Log in
        Log in