Muscle Math

  1. New Member
    ohno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    111
    Level
    2
    Lv. Percent
    51.67%

    Muscle Math


    Ok, I need a math check.
    Sept. 2005 151 lbs, 5 percent fat - so that's 7.55 lbs fat.
    Now, 169 lbs, 11 percent fat - that's 18.59 lbs fat.
    The difference is 11.04 lbs fat, and the total difference is 18 lbs.
    Does that mean that for all of that hard work and clean eating I've only put on about 7 lbs of muscle? Damn it!

  2. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.82%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Or it means the beginning measurements or ending measurements or both were off giving you false numbers. What does the mirror tell you?
  3. New Member
    ohno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    111
    Level
    2
    Lv. Percent
    51.67%

    Yep, that's possible Jayhawk. I am definitely bigger (not just fatter -- thicker lats, traps, chest, quads etc.) than I was, and I can still see my abs -- but I have been using the same scale throughout.

    I'm not even saying I'm disappointed in the results in terms of strength increases, appearance, and how I feel. It's just that if my math is right, that was a tough won 7 lbs.
    •   
       

  4. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.82%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    The numbers are off. It sounds like you gained mostly lean mass if you're still seeing abs and you see thickness. That's all that matters.
  5. New Member
    AllInOneBottle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    16
    Rep Power
    114
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    82.5%

    Well it's not all that matters if he has got his diet and training tight,but maybe you weren't 5% bodyfat and you didn't put as much fat on as your saying?
  6. New Member
    ohno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    111
    Level
    2
    Lv. Percent
    51.67%

    Jayhawkk/AllInOneBottle--

    Yeah, I do fall into the lazy habit of taking the scale (and it's body fat function) as gospel even though I'm well aware of the limitations/variability in its results. I was pretty lean last summer -- running and biking a combined total of 8 or more hours a week, but if I was actually say 6% then and 10% now instead of the 5% and 11% that the machine reports, well that's a few more lean pounds right there.

    So, quality of data aside -- the math IS correct in my original post, right? There's not some basic error that you see is there is there?
  7. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.82%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    Okay allononebottle, tell me how the %'s would make any difference otherwise?..

    Yeah, your math is right.
  8. New Member
    AllInOneBottle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    16
    Rep Power
    114
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    82.5%

    Well if he was originally a higher bodyfat in September '05,let's say 8%,and now is 11% like he said.Wouldn't that mean less fat has been put on and more muscle?
  9. Diamond Member
    Jayhawkk's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    39
    Posts
    12,790
    Rep Power
    11682
    Level
    67
    Lv. Percent
    47.82%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProPosting ProPosting AuthorityPosting Veteran

    That's why I said if he's looking in the mirror and the changes he sees are good ones, it is all that really matters. He can see abs while noticing gains in his muscle.

    If your waist stayed the same and you could see your abs and your arms and chest got bigger(muscular). What would mean more to you? some % or how you and others see you?
  10. New Member
    AllInOneBottle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    16
    Rep Power
    114
    Level
    3
    Lv. Percent
    82.5%

    True yer,I understand what you mean by the look in the mirror and that's all it goes by in Bodybuilding,unless your competing and need to get in a specific weight class lol
  11. Registered User
    not_big_enuf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,102
    Rep Power
    671
    Level
    25
    Lv. Percent
    88.94%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Take a step back for a minute here. 5% is extremely low. I'm not doubting you were there at all, but that's REALLY low and typically your body is going to fight like hell to put on weight. Having no clue who you are, I'd guess 5% was a little low for you and you were higher... 7-8% and probably put on only a few lbs of fat. Putting thing into perspective even more, Lance Armstrong, 8% BF during his rides. When most BBers are on stage you're looking at 4-6% so... that's extremely low.

    Anyway, don't stress it. You still have abs and if you want to stay lean you know how to do it. Losing a couple lbs of fat will be cake for ya!
  12. Professional Member
    mixedup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    3,506
    Rep Power
    170748
    Level
    43
    Lv. Percent
    85.18%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    Were you taking any type of supplements? if the figures are correct that's about 1lb of muscle a month I think. not sure how much lbm one is supposed to be able to gain hormone free.
  13. Registered User
    not_big_enuf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,102
    Rep Power
    671
    Level
    25
    Lv. Percent
    88.94%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    I didn't know you could gain muscle without supplementation? Hmm... news to me!

    Honestly, on a big bulk you can probably put on a .5 lb of muscle a week. With that I'd suggest there's going to be some fat gain too. Yes, you can put on more, but it's pretty hard. Also depends how long you've been lifting/gaining, etc too. The bigger you get, the harder it is to put on muscle.

    Quote Originally Posted by mixedup
    Were you taking any type of supplements? if the figures are correct that's about 1lb of muscle a month I think. not sure how much lbm one is supposed to be able to gain hormone free.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Muscle Milk
    By Sanosuke in forum Supplements
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 04-13-2008, 09:00 PM
  2. whats your favorite muscle to train?
    By hamper19 in forum General Chat
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-12-2005, 12:11 AM
  3. Muscle pain and working out
    By windwords7 in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-07-2003, 03:03 AM
  4. Exercise Phys.- Muscle Fiber Types
    By YellowJacket in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-12-2002, 12:42 PM
  5. Basic Skeletal Muscle Anatomy....
    By Lifeguard in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-12-2002, 08:26 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in