Creating symmetry

  1. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    59
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    56.46%

    Creating symmetry


    Hey guys,
    I'm currently sitting at 5'11 and around 188 on a bulk. I notice that my legs are slightly bigger in proportion to my upper body. My legs are 24" while my arms are 14.5". My arms aren't that small, but my chest and back make my legs look so much bigger than my upper body. I have heard a lot of stuff about you need to work legs to grow other muscles. I was wondering if I could stop training legs for a bit to allow my upper to catch up. Should I train legs less often like very other week? Or not at all. Thanks for the help

  2. ThunderHumper's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,058
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    18.92%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    are you sure youre not just fat? whats youre bf at? 14.5' arms arnt that big on 5'11 188lbs

    sry if it sounds mean, just tryin to get some details
  3. Board Supporter
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    10,512
    Rep Power
    7504915
    Level
    99
    Lv. Percent
    14.52%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderHumper
    are you sure youre not just fat? whats youre bf at? 14.5' arms arnt that big on 5'11 188lbs

    sry if it sounds mean, just tryin to get some details
    Strong this. I have 14.9 and 14.6 cold and my arms are in no way large and weigh ~25 lbs leas than you....

    And my legs are slightly larger....
    Body Performance Solutions Representative

    Check out our products at www.bpsnutrition.net
    Check out our FaceBook page at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Body-Performance-Solutions/191322614238042
    •   
       

  4. Advanced Member
    Oscar's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    961
    Rep Power
    195283
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    49.55%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderHumper View Post
    are you sure youre not just fat? whats youre bf at? 14.5' arms arnt that big on 5'11 188lbs

    sry if it sounds mean, just tryin to get some details
    beat me to it. also not trying to sound mean but worry about getting in shape first then put on some size and then you can worry about symmetry issues. and I wouldnt call 5'11 and 188 fat, maybe skinnyfat but not really fat. now as for symmetry issues my left lat inserts a good inch higher than my right looks kind of goofy but not a whole lot that can be done

    also don't stop training legs especially if you're only rollin on 24"s hell my calves are a good 25" and last I checked upper legs were 27.5" also you're legs are supposed to be a good deal bigger than your arms mine sit at 16.5 and 16 cold 18 and 18.5 with a pump and don't look overly disproportionate to my lower body
  5. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    59
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    56.46%

    Not fat at all. And sorry I don't weight 188 that was just a reading from a stupid scale. I'm around 183.5 as of this morning. Here's a photo

    Name:  image-2295231768.jpg
Views: 132
Size:  388.9 KB

    Ill get a better set of photos soon
  6. Elite Member
    Jiigzz's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,555
    Rep Power
    4550931
    Level
    81
    Lv. Percent
    86.28%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranPosting ProPosting Authority

    There are only two major muscles in the arms (each with multiple heads) + a few synergistic muscles. Then your legs have ALOT of muscles (Quads which is four major muscles, Hamstring group, adductors, abductors etc.) so would you not expect your legs to have more growth potential than your arms?
  7. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    59
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    56.46%

    Quote Originally Posted by Jiigzz
    There are only two major muscles in the arms (each with multiple heads) + a few synergistic muscles. Then your legs have ALOT of muscles (Quads which is four major muscles, Hamstring group, adductors, abductors etc.) so would you not expect your legs to have more growth potential than your arms?
    Yes but I'm talking in proportions here. You completely avoided the question. To bring up upper body relative to lower should I stop legs or just decrease frequency
  8. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    59
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    56.46%

    Quote Originally Posted by Jiigzz
    There are only two major muscles in the arms (each with multiple heads) + a few synergistic muscles. Then your legs have ALOT of muscles (Quads which is four major muscles, Hamstring group, adductors, abductors etc.) so would you not expect your legs to have more growth potential than your arms?
    You didn't answer the question I'm talking about proportions here
  9. Board Supporter
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    10,512
    Rep Power
    7504915
    Level
    99
    Lv. Percent
    14.52%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mdigregori

    Yes but I'm talking in proportions here. You completely avoided the question. To bring up upper body relative to lower should I stop legs or just decrease frequency
    You aren't disproportionate.
    Body Performance Solutions Representative

    Check out our products at www.bpsnutrition.net
    Check out our FaceBook page at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Body-Performance-Solutions/191322614238042
  10. Senior Member
    thyrod's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,378
    Rep Power
    74278
    Level
    34
    Lv. Percent
    87.56%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    **** you really dont look 188 pounds(no insult intended)
  11. ThunderHumper's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,058
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    18.92%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by thyrod
    **** you really dont look 188 pounds(no insult intended)
    i agree here. you look 165 to tell you the truth. your legs must be huge or something. thatnpicture doesnt really help with your question too much. but you arnt fat lol so point proven on that part
  12. Board Supporter
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    10,512
    Rep Power
    7504915
    Level
    99
    Lv. Percent
    14.52%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderHumper

    i agree here. you look 165 to tell you the truth. your legs must be huge or something. thatnpicture doesnt really help with your question too much. but you arnt fat lol so point proven on that part
    His legs are apparently smaller than mine according to his original post....
    Body Performance Solutions Representative

    Check out our products at www.bpsnutrition.net
    Check out our FaceBook page at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Body-Performance-Solutions/191322614238042
  13. Advanced Member
    Oscar's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    961
    Rep Power
    195283
    Level
    32
    Lv. Percent
    49.55%
    Achievements Activity Pro

    Don't stop training legs they are not out of proportion with your upper body, if anything train them and everything else even harder
  14. Elite Member
    Jiigzz's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    5,555
    Rep Power
    4550931
    Level
    81
    Lv. Percent
    86.28%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranPosting ProPosting Authority

    Quote Originally Posted by mdigregori View Post
    Yes but I'm talking in proportions here. You completely avoided the question. To bring up upper body relative to lower should I stop legs or just decrease frequency
    No. If you are that concerned then increase frequency (while simultaneously dropping volume) or increase volume of upper body work. But you arnt out of proportion
  15. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    59
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    56.46%

    Not 188. I usually fluctuate around 180. Legs are 24". I am also 5' 11" so if I was 165 I would be skinny as hell. I also have a wide frame
  16. Board Supporter
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    10,512
    Rep Power
    7504915
    Level
    99
    Lv. Percent
    14.52%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mdigregori
    Not 188. I usually fluctuate around 180. Legs are 24". I am also 5' 11" so if I was 165 I would be skinny as hell. I also have a wide frame
    I am 5'10" 165 and have bigger arms and legs.
    Body Performance Solutions Representative

    Check out our products at www.bpsnutrition.net
    Check out our FaceBook page at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Body-Performance-Solutions/191322614238042
  17. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    59
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    56.46%

    Quote Originally Posted by jimbuick

    I am 5'10" 165 and have bigger arms and legs.
    Somehow I find this hard to believe. How big is your waist. I have a 33/34" waist
  18. Board Supporter
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    10,512
    Rep Power
    7504915
    Level
    99
    Lv. Percent
    14.52%
    Achievements Activity ProActivity AuthorityActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mdigregori

    Somehow I find this hard to believe. How big is your waist. I have a 33/34" waist
    33.7" at the navel.
    Body Performance Solutions Representative

    Check out our products at www.bpsnutrition.net
    Check out our FaceBook page at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Body-Performance-Solutions/191322614238042
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. How come bber's don't creat thier own videos?
    By bux4source in forum General Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-20-2005, 07:13 PM
  2. how do you create polls?
    By UNDERTAKER in forum General Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-15-2005, 11:23 AM
  3. Creating a batch
    By bulkmuscle in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-13-2004, 01:00 AM
  4. I need help: Arm Symmetry Problem...
    By Sheesh in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-25-2003, 11:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in