Creating symmetry

  1. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    65
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    78.17%

    Creating symmetry


    Hey guys,
    I'm currently sitting at 5'11 and around 188 on a bulk. I notice that my legs are slightly bigger in proportion to my upper body. My legs are 24" while my arms are 14.5". My arms aren't that small, but my chest and back make my legs look so much bigger than my upper body. I have heard a lot of stuff about you need to work legs to grow other muscles. I was wondering if I could stop training legs for a bit to allow my upper to catch up. Should I train legs less often like very other week? Or not at all. Thanks for the help

  2. ThunderHumper's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,058
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    18.92%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    are you sure youre not just fat? whats youre bf at? 14.5' arms arnt that big on 5'11 188lbs

    sry if it sounds mean, just tryin to get some details
  3. Diamond Member
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,007
    Rep Power
    8282283
    Level
    101
    Lv. Percent
    84.15%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderHumper
    are you sure youre not just fat? whats youre bf at? 14.5' arms arnt that big on 5'11 188lbs

    sry if it sounds mean, just tryin to get some details
    Strong this. I have 14.9 and 14.6 cold and my arms are in no way large and weigh ~25 lbs leas than you....

    And my legs are slightly larger....
    •   
       

  4. Senior Member
    Oscar's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,003
    Rep Power
    242106
    Level
    33
    Lv. Percent
    92.9%
    Achievements Posting ProActivity Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderHumper View Post
    are you sure youre not just fat? whats youre bf at? 14.5' arms arnt that big on 5'11 188lbs

    sry if it sounds mean, just tryin to get some details
    beat me to it. also not trying to sound mean but worry about getting in shape first then put on some size and then you can worry about symmetry issues. and I wouldnt call 5'11 and 188 fat, maybe skinnyfat but not really fat. now as for symmetry issues my left lat inserts a good inch higher than my right looks kind of goofy but not a whole lot that can be done

    also don't stop training legs especially if you're only rollin on 24"s hell my calves are a good 25" and last I checked upper legs were 27.5" also you're legs are supposed to be a good deal bigger than your arms mine sit at 16.5 and 16 cold 18 and 18.5 with a pump and don't look overly disproportionate to my lower body
  5. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    65
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    78.17%

    Not fat at all. And sorry I don't weight 188 that was just a reading from a stupid scale. I'm around 183.5 as of this morning. Here's a photo

    Name:  image-2295231768.jpg
Views: 137
Size:  388.9 KB

    Ill get a better set of photos soon
  6. Elite Member
    Jiigzz's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,762
    Rep Power
    9865028
    Level
    100
    Lv. Percent
    79.16%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    There are only two major muscles in the arms (each with multiple heads) + a few synergistic muscles. Then your legs have ALOT of muscles (Quads which is four major muscles, Hamstring group, adductors, abductors etc.) so would you not expect your legs to have more growth potential than your arms?
  7. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    65
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    78.17%

    Quote Originally Posted by Jiigzz
    There are only two major muscles in the arms (each with multiple heads) + a few synergistic muscles. Then your legs have ALOT of muscles (Quads which is four major muscles, Hamstring group, adductors, abductors etc.) so would you not expect your legs to have more growth potential than your arms?
    Yes but I'm talking in proportions here. You completely avoided the question. To bring up upper body relative to lower should I stop legs or just decrease frequency
  8. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    65
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    78.17%

    Quote Originally Posted by Jiigzz
    There are only two major muscles in the arms (each with multiple heads) + a few synergistic muscles. Then your legs have ALOT of muscles (Quads which is four major muscles, Hamstring group, adductors, abductors etc.) so would you not expect your legs to have more growth potential than your arms?
    You didn't answer the question I'm talking about proportions here
  9. Diamond Member
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,007
    Rep Power
    8282283
    Level
    101
    Lv. Percent
    84.15%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mdigregori

    Yes but I'm talking in proportions here. You completely avoided the question. To bring up upper body relative to lower should I stop legs or just decrease frequency
    You aren't disproportionate.
  10. Senior Member
    thyrod's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  230 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,464
    Rep Power
    74327
    Level
    35
    Lv. Percent
    40.8%
    Achievements Activity ProPosting Pro

    **** you really dont look 188 pounds(no insult intended)
  11. ThunderHumper's Avatar
    Stats
    5'11"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,058
    Rep Power
    0
    Level
    26
    Lv. Percent
    18.92%
    Achievements Posting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by thyrod
    **** you really dont look 188 pounds(no insult intended)
    i agree here. you look 165 to tell you the truth. your legs must be huge or something. thatnpicture doesnt really help with your question too much. but you arnt fat lol so point proven on that part
  12. Diamond Member
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,007
    Rep Power
    8282283
    Level
    101
    Lv. Percent
    84.15%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderHumper

    i agree here. you look 165 to tell you the truth. your legs must be huge or something. thatnpicture doesnt really help with your question too much. but you arnt fat lol so point proven on that part
    His legs are apparently smaller than mine according to his original post....
  13. Senior Member
    Oscar's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  210 lbs.
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,003
    Rep Power
    242106
    Level
    33
    Lv. Percent
    92.9%
    Achievements Posting ProActivity Pro

    Don't stop training legs they are not out of proportion with your upper body, if anything train them and everything else even harder
  14. Elite Member
    Jiigzz's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  205 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    6,762
    Rep Power
    9865028
    Level
    100
    Lv. Percent
    79.16%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mdigregori View Post
    Yes but I'm talking in proportions here. You completely avoided the question. To bring up upper body relative to lower should I stop legs or just decrease frequency
    No. If you are that concerned then increase frequency (while simultaneously dropping volume) or increase volume of upper body work. But you arnt out of proportion
  15. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    65
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    78.17%

    Not 188. I usually fluctuate around 180. Legs are 24". I am also 5' 11" so if I was 165 I would be skinny as hell. I also have a wide frame
  16. Diamond Member
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,007
    Rep Power
    8282283
    Level
    101
    Lv. Percent
    84.15%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mdigregori
    Not 188. I usually fluctuate around 180. Legs are 24". I am also 5' 11" so if I was 165 I would be skinny as hell. I also have a wide frame
    I am 5'10" 165 and have bigger arms and legs.
  17. New Member
    mdigregori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    33
    Rep Power
    65
    Level
    5
    Lv. Percent
    78.17%

    Quote Originally Posted by jimbuick

    I am 5'10" 165 and have bigger arms and legs.
    Somehow I find this hard to believe. How big is your waist. I have a 33/34" waist
  18. Diamond Member
    jimbuick's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  200 lbs.
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    11,007
    Rep Power
    8282283
    Level
    101
    Lv. Percent
    84.15%
    Achievements Activity AuthorityActivity ProActivity VeteranActivity RoyaltyPosting Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mdigregori

    Somehow I find this hard to believe. How big is your waist. I have a 33/34" waist
    33.7" at the navel.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. How come bber's don't creat thier own videos?
    By bux4source in forum General Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-20-2005, 06:13 PM
  2. how do you create polls?
    By UNDERTAKER in forum General Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-15-2005, 10:23 AM
  3. Creating a batch
    By bulkmuscle in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-13-2004, 12:00 AM
  4. I need help: Arm Symmetry Problem...
    By Sheesh in forum Exercise Science
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-25-2003, 10:21 PM
Log in
Log in