3AD = MMv2???
- 03-26-2009, 03:48 PM
- 03-27-2009, 08:54 AM
- 03-27-2009, 11:55 AM
What happened to 2-androstenol?
MMV2, from what you've got written there, is epi-androsterone. 3-AD contains (regular) androsterone.
They both don't convert to stanolone at the same rate.
The epi-version, being 5-beta-reduced, will convert more readily to epi-DHT. The reason why the hydroxyls are facing different directions is due to the orientation of the A-ring on the steroidal chain. Mis-orientation can create a steric, leading to a dampered binding-affinity for the androgen receptor.
03-27-2009, 05:58 PM
yeah i know each has different things along with it but wanted to know the difference... what your conversion rate to stanolone??
03-28-2009, 04:56 PM
Well, the conversion rate of an oral 17-keto steroid to a 17-hydroxy is about 60%. After this step, however, there is the conversion of the 3-hydroxyl to a 3-ketone, which isn't quite as high, but I would suppose similar.
So for a simple approximation, we've got two steps, each at about 60% of a favorable conversion rate. 60%*60% = about 40%
Similar Forum Threads
- By alvin1 in forum SupplementsReplies: 7Last Post: 04-07-2011, 09:40 AM
- By deadikated in forum AnabolicsReplies: 1Last Post: 03-20-2009, 10:42 PM
- By DieselPump in forum NutraplanetReplies: 28Last Post: 12-10-2008, 04:34 PM
- By mulliganoct in forum LG SciencesReplies: 6Last Post: 08-01-2008, 01:42 PM
- By Dadof2 in forum LG SciencesReplies: 0Last Post: 04-17-2008, 02:14 PM