B
bossman523
Banned
- Awards
- 0
Hi Patrick,
Can you tell me about this stuff? at your leisure, of course
your friend,
Brian
Can you tell me about this stuff? at your leisure, of course
your friend,
Brian
Interesting compound. I wonder how well it converts to eq. Stano is pretty good non-methylated to stack with hdrol.the stuff i got is actually called pro-eq, but same ingredients. i wanted something to stack with my halodrol that was non-methylated.
So any "bold" precursor has zero bodybuilding benefits?
Do you know to what extent it will surppress? Time to look up some studies instead of paying attention in chemistry class =DI just researched this a bit more and i may have been a bit premature. 17a-hydroxyprogesterone caproate apparently does not hydrolyze so it wouldnt be expected to be able to metabolize to testosterone.
The question is, will the amount of conversion be worth the amount of suppression
Do you know to what extent it will surppress? Time to look up some studies instead of paying attention in chemistry class =D
Interesting, ive been using pbold for a few weeks now.....
I didnt buy it, and i received 4 bottles.. Most reviews seem positive so i figured why not try it.. It is taurus's brand but pro-eq from lg science had decent beta reviews as wellwith all the options why would you take this stuff?
is this oral or topical?the dose just seems too tiny to be of any benefit. the stuff converts to boldione and boldione itself is known to be useless at 20mg a servingcorrect me if i am off base hereI didnt buy it, and i received 4 bottles.. Most reviews seem positive so i figured why not try it.. It is taurus's brand but pro-eq from lg science had decent beta reviews as well
Im using 8ml a day, so 120mgs, its sublingual...is this oral or topical?the dose just seems too tiny to be of any benefit. the stuff converts to boldione and boldione itself is known to be useless at 20mg a servingcorrect me if i am off base here
I wasnt sure what to expect honestly....either way you feel its not worth it?u probably are better off going oral.
plus since 120mg of boldione does pretty much notihing, i wonder how you expect 120mg of boldione precursor to work
or maybe you just like the way it tastes
I wasnt sure what to expect honestly....either way you feel its not worth it?
What would say is the ideal "hundreds of mg"?
Fair enough, we'll find out soon enoughI would like to see you come to your own conclusion based on the facts i give you.
i was actually gonna get some furazadrol but they didn't have any at the place i went to buy it. i think i am going to get a debit card so i can start buying online. it's cheaper and more options.Interesting compound. I wonder how well it converts to eq. Stano is pretty good non-methylated to stack with hdrol.
I believe its bannedi was actually gonna get some furazadrol but they didn't have any at the place i went to buy it. i think i am going to get a debit card so i can start buying online. it's cheaper and more options.
I'm pretty disappointed that this isn't a viable bold alternative. I loved the original bold ph. I'm still pissed they banned it.
it tastes like ass fwiw. i'm taking 160mg a day.
no but 17a-hydroxyprogesterone is readily available so anyone can sell it if they wantis there anything on the market now that is a one step conversion to androstenedione?
Would reaction of this compounds with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid give you androstenedione and androstadienedione
Boldione needs a hell of a lot more than 200mg, let alone 20.is this oral or topical?the dose just seems too tiny to be of any benefit. the stuff converts to boldione and boldione itself is known to be useless at 20mg a servingcorrect me if i am off base here
Boldione needs a hell of a lot more than 200mg, let alone 20.
That's why doing research on the compound is essential.Is there any reason why any human being should trust or be giving any money to these supplement companies who seem to care about nothing but money and will lie all day and night to manipulate you? Lol
Why? That **** kinda sucked IMO.Wish there still was a legit bold pro hormone available like eq plex.
If someone is lying to you and manipulating you, do you REALLY need to ask if there's a reason to trust them? Or are you that dumb?Is there any reason why any human being should trust or be giving any money to these supplement companies who seem to care about nothing but money and will lie all day and night to manipulate you?
Why? That **** kinda sucked IMO.
It was pretty mild. But it treated me very well. Zero sides, nice strength boost, appetite increase, good consistent lean mass gains, great mood, and my joints felt fantastic.
i ask myself this every dayIs there any reason why any human being should trust or be giving any money to these supplement companies who seem to care about nothing but money and will lie all day and night to manipulate you? Lol
should i trust you, Pat?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
B | Unanswered 17a-methyl-etioallocholan-17b-ol-3 hydroxyimine ? | Supplements | 10 | |
Y | 17ahydroxy 19 norprogesterone | LG Sciences | 1 | |
What is (2a, 17a-dimethyl-17b-hydroxy-5(a)) | Anabolics | 18 | ||
B | The One aka 17a-methyl-etioallocholan-17b-ol-3-hydroxyimine | Supplements | 11 | |
J | Cyanostane? (2-cyano-17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-androst-3-one) | Anabolics | 20 |